Uncontrolled hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield and results in ∼1.5 million deaths each year. The primary current treatment options are gauze and/or tourniquets, which are ineffective for up to 80% of wounds. Additionally, most hemostatic materials must be removed from the patient within <12 h, which limits their applicability in remote scenarios and can cause additional bleeding upon removal. Here, degradable shape memory polymer (SMP) foams were synthesized to overcome these limitations. SMP foams were modified with oxidatively labile ether groups and hydrolytically labile ester groups to degrade after implantation. Foam physical, thermal, and shape memory properties were assessed along with cytocompatibility and blood interactions. Degradation profiles were obtained in vitro in oxidative and hydrolytic media (3% H2O2 (oxidation) and 0.1 M NaOH (hydrolysis) at 37 °C). The resulting foams had tunable, clinically relevant degradation rates, with complete mass loss within 30-60 days. These SMP foams have potential to provide an easy-to-use, shape-filling hemostatic dressing that can be left in place during traumatic wound healing with future potential use in regenerative medicine applications.
Uncontrolled hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield and results in ∼1.5 million deaths each year. The primary current treatment options are gauze and/or tourniquets, which are ineffective for up to 80% of wounds. Additionally, most hemostatic materials must be removed from the patient within <12 h, which limits their applicability in remote scenarios and can cause additional bleeding upon removal. Here, degradable shape memory polymer (SMP) foams were synthesized to overcome these limitations. SMP foams were modified with oxidatively labile ether groups and hydrolytically labile ester groups to degrade after implantation. Foam physical, thermal, and shape memory properties were assessed along with cytocompatibility and blood interactions. Degradation profiles were obtained in vitro in oxidative and hydrolytic media (3% H2O2 (oxidation) and 0.1 M NaOH (hydrolysis) at 37 °C). The resulting foams had tunable, clinically relevant degradation rates, with complete mass loss within 30-60 days. These SMP foams have potential to provide an easy-to-use, shape-filling hemostatic dressing that can be left in place during traumatic wound healing with future potential use in regenerative medicine applications.
Hemorrhage
is the leading cause of potentially survivable death
on the battlefield. Up to 90% of preventable deaths are due to uncontrolled
bleeding, and approximately 20% of combat casualties result in death
before the injured can be transported to a treatment facility.[1−3] The most common hemorrhage treatment includes the use of tourniquets
and gauze coated with coagulants. However, gauze is often ineffective
at promoting clotting, and improper or prolonged tourniquet use can
lead to complications like nerve paralysis, limb ischemia, arrhythmias,
and crush syndrome, which can result in amputation above the position
of a tourniquet.[4,5] This urgent clinical need has
led to the recent development of new options for hemorrhage control.
For example, XStat is designed for bleeding control from junctional
wounds.[6] XStat contains ∼95 oxidized
cellulose foam pieces that are injected into the wound using a syringe-like
applicator, after which they expand and fill up the wound to apply
pressure and induce clotting.[7] Each foam
piece must be removed within 4 h to prevent ischemia, and XStat exhibits
a 22-fold increase in removal time compared with gauze.[6,8] This removal process can also lead to rebleeds of surrounding tissues.
Therefore, XStat may not be the best alternative to gauze in remote
locations where access to a fixed care facility is limited.To overcome limitations of current hemostatic dressing options,
an ideal hemostatic material is biocompatible, promotes rapid blood
clotting, and is degradable. A degradable hemostatic dressing could
theoretically be left in place after application to degrade during
healing, prolonging the time available to get a patient to a fixed
facility and reducing rebleed risks upon removal. To that end, He
et al. prepared oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) gauze.[9] In a rabbit liver and ear-artery injury, this
material induced hemostasis and degraded fully within 21 days; however,
the gauze was forcibly removed by the blood flow from the artery,
which reduces its applicability in traumatic hemorrhage control. Dai
et al. developed silver-exchanged calcium-doped mesoporous silica
spheres for hemorrhage control.[10] The particles
achieved hemostasis within 340 s and underwent a 40% weight loss over
42 days in vitro. However, these mesoporous particles have a recorded
pore size of 3.2 nm, which is likely too small to facilitate tissue
ingrowth.[11] Porous chitosan-based hemostatic
microparticles were developed by Li et al.[12] The microspheres exhibit an increase in blood clotting with decreased
surface pore size and a 40% weight loss over 4 weeks of lysozyme incubation
but have a pore size of <2 μm. Thus, these microparticles
may not be suitable for deep wounds to aid tissue ingrowth.To address this clinical need, shape memory polymer (SMP) foams
are being investigated as hemostatic biomaterials.[13] SMPs are “smart” stimuli-responsive materials
that are synthesized in a primary, permanent shape, triggered using
an external stimulus, such as heat or light, and strained/fixed into
a temporary, secondary shape that is retained upon removal of the
external stimulus. After re-exposure to the stimulus, SMPs regain
their primary shape.[14] Heat is used as
an external stimulus in this polyurethane SMP foam system, and shape
change is designed around the polymer’s glass-transition temperature
(Tg). These foams are biocompatible and
capable of promoting rapid blood clotting due to their thrombogenic
surface chemistry and high surface area.[15,16]The shape memory properties allow SMP foam radial compression
and
storage in a low-profile, temporary geometry at temperatures below
their Tg. Foam Tg’s are reduced by exposure to water (relative to Tg in dry conditions) due to plasticization of
the polymer network.[17] Therefore, SMP foams
can be stored compressed at relatively high temperatures (∼40
to 50 °C) in the dry state. This smaller volume material can
theoretically be packed into deep and/or irregularly shaped wounds,
which is particularly important in gunshot wounds, which often have
small entry points that expand outwards into large internal wound
cavities.[18] Once exposed to water present
in blood at body temperature (37 °C), the foam Tg is reduced, allowing expansion back to the original
shape to fill up the space of wound, clotting the blood and reducing
further hemorrhage. One of the main advantages of these foams over
commercially available hemostatic materials is that their chemistry
can be tuned according to application requirements. The goal of the
current work is to modify the SMP foams to degrade after implantation
to enable prolonged use and reduce rebleed risks during removal.Weems et al. found that SMP foams undergo oxidative degradation
via scission of tertiary amines in the monomers.[19] “Real-time” in vitro degradation studies
in 3% H2O2 revealed a 50% mass loss over ∼100
days. To increase the degradation rate, previous efforts focused on
incorporating hydrolytically degradable ester linkages into the polymer
network. Singhal et al. added poly(caprolactone) macromers into the
system.[20] These foams had a relatively
low Tg around 20 °C, which limits
their stable storage in the secondary shape, and mass losses were
slow, even in accelerated degradation media.[21] Weems et al. synthesized succinic acid-based ester-containing foams
with higher Tg.[22] However, degradable formulations still had relatively low dry Tg (∼37 °C) and mass loss rates that
are slower than wound healing rates (complete mass loss in 80 days
in 2% H2O2). To improve upon this system, degradable
SMP foams with appropriate thermal properties (Tg > 50 °C) were developed by Jang et al. using ester-containing
trifunctional monomers.[23] However, the
fastest complete mass loss was observed within 90 days in an accelerated
oxidative degradation medium (20% H2O2). Thus,
SMP foams with appropriate thermal properties and more rapid degradation
rates to better match tissue regeneration are still required.Due to the hydrophobicity of the foams, we hypothesized that clinically
relevant degradation rates (∼6 to 8 weeks based on previous
clinical data[24]) could be obtained by increasing
the local hydrophilicity around hydrolytically degradable ester groups.
To that end, we synthesized new monomers by esterifying nitrilotriacetic
acid (NTA) with diethylene glycol (DEG) and incorporated the resulting
ester-containing monomer into SMP foams. NTA includes an oxidatively
degradable tertiary amine, DEG increases hydrophilicity next to the
hydrolytically degradable ester linkages, and the ether linkages of
DEG are susceptible to oxidative degradation.[20] After characterizing scaffold properties, cytocompatibility, and
blood interactions, degradation was assessed in 3% H2O2 at 37 °C to mimic real-time oxidative degradation in
the body and in an accelerated hydrolytic degradation solution (0.1
M NaOH).[25,26] Mass loss, pore size/structure, surface
chemistry, and Tg were measured over time
to establish in vitro degradation profiles. These SMPs have the potential
to provide an easy-to-use, shape-filling hemostatic dressing that
can be left in place during traumatic wound healing.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, certified ACS, 30%),
sodium hydroxide (NaOH),
ethanol (reagent alcohol), chloroform, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA),
1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodimide HCl (EDC), 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
(DMAP, ≥99%), hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis-(2-hydroxypropyl)-ethylenediamine
(HPED), triethanolamine (TEA), diethylene glycol (DEG), Triton X-100,
and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Fisher Scientific
(Waltham, MA) and used as received. Porcine blood was purchased from
Lampire Biological Laboratories (Pipersville, PA). Glutaraldehyde
was purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA). EPH-190,
BL-22, and T-131 were provided by Evonik (Essen, Germany) and used
as received.
Synthesis of Ester-Containing
Triol
NTA and DEG were added to chloroform at a 1:3 molar
ratio with 0.1
mol. equiv of DMAP and 3 mol. equiv of EDC as catalysts (Figure ). The reaction was
carried out at 40 °C in a nitrogen environment over molecular
sieves, which were added to capture water produced during the esterification
reaction. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR, Nicolet iS10, Thermo Scientific) was carried
out on the reaction product every 24 h to track its completion according
to the introduction of a peak at ∼1714 cm–1 that corresponds with the C=O of the ester. Upon reaction
completion, excess solvent was vaporized using rotary evaporation,
and the final product was dried overnight under vacuum. The dried
product, NTA–DEG, was analyzed using ATR-FTIR and 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR, Bruker Avance III HD 400 MHz)
spectroscopy to confirm the formation of ester linkages. Successful
esterification of DEG was indicated by an ester peak at 1741 cm–1 in the FTIR spectra (Figure S1a). NMR spectra were collected in CDCl3 at 298 K using
the TMS/solvent signal as an internal reference. NTA–DEG: 1H NMR (CDCl3; ppm): 3.64 (t, −CH2CH2OCO−), 3.64 (t, −CH2OH), 3.72
(s, −CH2N−), 3.78 (t, −CH2CH2OH), and 4.25 (s, −CH2OCO−).
NMR confirmed 85–88% functionalization of NTA carboxylic acids
with DEG (Figure S1b).
Figure 1
Synthesis of ester-containing
monomer, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA)–diethylene
glycol (DEG).
Synthesis of ester-containing
monomer, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA)–diethylene
glycol (DEG).
Foam
Synthesis
Polyurethane foams
were fabricated using a two-step process. In the first step, an isocyanate
(NCO) premix was prepared that contained 100 mol % of required isocyanates
from HDI and a fraction of hydroxyl equivalents from HPED, TEA, and
NTA–DEG. The premix was reacted at 50 °C for 48 h. The
remaining mol % of hydroxyl components was mixed with catalysts (T-131
and BL-22) and a blowing agent (deionized (DI) water). Surfactant
(EPH-190) was added to the premix after the 48 h cure. The NCO premix
and hydroxyl components were mixed in a high-speed mixer (Flacktek,
Landrum, SC) and poured into a large beaker, which was incubated at
50 °C for 5–10 min to allow for foam formation. Synthesized
foam compositions are shown in Table .
Table 1
Synthesized Foam Compositions
sample ID
HDI (wt %)
HPED (wt %)
TEA (wt %)
DEG (wt %)
NTA–DEG (wt %)
EPH-190 (wt %)
T-131 (wt %)
BL-22 (wt %)
water (wt %)
Control
54.03
27.61
8.05
6.44
0.46
1.01
2.37
15% NTA–DEG
49.45
25.27
3.93
11.23
6.44
1.20
1.01
2.40
30% NTA–DEG
43.10
24.40
21.71
6.17
1.10
1.23
2.29
Foam
Pore Analysis
Pore sizes of
samples were measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Samples
(n = 3, 1 cm2) were cut along the vertical
and lateral foam axes and sputter-coated with gold using a Denton
Vacuum sputter coater before imaging (Jeol JSM 5600) at 35× magnification
and a 10 kV high vacuum. The micrographs were analyzed using ImageJ
software to quantify pore diameters.
Density
Samples (n = 3) were cut into cubes (1 cm3) using a hot wire cutter,
and the length of each face was measured using digital calipers. Measurements
were converted to volumes, and samples were then weighed to determine
densities.
Mechanical Testing
Samples (n = 3) were cut in dog bone shapes (ASTM
D638 scaled down
by a factor of 4) with a gauge length of 6.25 mm and a width of 1.5
mm. The samples were tested in both dry and wet conditions. To measure
wet tensile properties, samples (n = 3) were placed
in 50 °C DI water for 5 min and pressed dry prior to fixing on
the tensile tester. Samples were placed into a tensile tester with
a 24 N load cell and stretched at a rate of 2 mm/min until failure
to measure elastic modulus, elongation at break, and ultimate tensile
strength.
Thermal Analysis
A Q200 differential
scanning calorimeter (DSC, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE) was used
to measure Tg. Samples (n = 3, 3–5 mg) were placed in t-zero aluminum pans and then
equilibrated at −40 °C, heated to 120 °C at 10 °C/min,
kept isothermally for 2 min, cooled to −40 °C, kept isothermally
for 2 min, and heated to 120 °C at 10 °C/min. Dry Tg was measured as the half-height transition
temperature during the second heating cycle. To measure wet Tg, samples (n = 3) were placed
in 50 °C DI water for 5 min, pressed dry, and placed in t-zero
aluminum pans prior to running a single heating cycle.
Swelling Ratio
Cylindrical foam samples
(∼20 to 30 mg in dry weight) were cut, cleaned in DI water
and 70% ethanol, and dried under vacuum at 40 °C. Their dry masses
(Wd) were obtained (n = 3), and then they were placed in 37 °C water for 5 min or
24 h. Samples were patted dry on a laboratory wipe and then weighed
to obtain swollen masses (Ww). Swelling
ratio (SR) was calculated as
Shape Memory Behavior
Cylindrical
foam samples (1 cm length, 8 mm diameter) were cut, cleaned in DI
water and 70% ethanol, and dried under vacuum at 40 °C. Cleaned
samples were heated to 100 °C for 10 min. The diameter (n = 3) was measured using digital calipers prior to crimping
cylinders in a radial compression crimper (Blockwise Engineering,
Tempe, AZ) and cooling them down while crimped. Crimped samples were
placed in vials in a dry box containing a desiccant for 24 h and then
fixed on a 330 μm Nitinol wire. Their diameters were measured
again, and then they were placed in a DI water bath at 37 °C.
Expansion profiles were captured using a camera that recorded images
every 5 s for 5 min. The images were processed using Insight Toolkit
(ITK) to measure the change in diameter over time. Foam area (number
of pixels) from each image was normalized against that of the last
image with the known diameter (measured using calipers after foam
was removed from the water bath), and % volume recovery was calculated
asFoam diameter vs time was plotted over the
expansion time frame.
Spectroscopic Analysis
Surface chemistry
of foams was characterized by collecting ATR-FTIR spectra on thin
slices of foam at a 0.8 cm–1 resolution.
Cytocompatibility
NIH/3T3 Swiss
mouse fibroblasts (ATCC–CCL92) were cultured with Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, high glucose GlutaMAX) supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin
(P/S, Gibco) at 37 °C/5% CO2. For all studies, cells
(between passages 4 and 6) were used after 3 days of culture. Cells
were seeded in a 24-well tissue-culture polystyrene plate at 10,000
cells/well and cultured for 24 h. Morphology was assessed using a
Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope to confirm even cell distribution.
Media was removed, and cells were washed with sterile phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) prior to exposure to samples. Then, the cleaned foam
pieces were placed in Transwell inserts in the preseeded plates along
with fresh DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. Positive (cytocompatible)
controls included wells with empty inserts, and negative (cytotoxic)
controls included wells with empty inserts and 0.5% H2O2 in media.Following incubation over 3, 24, and 72 h,
a Resazurin cell viability assay was utilized to quantify cytocompatibility.
Transwell inserts and solutions were removed from wells and replaced
with the Resazurin cell viability stain for 4 h at 37 °C. Then,
a plate reader (FLx800, BioTek Instruments, Inc.) was used to measure
absorbance at 570 nm. Cell viability was calculated aswhere x is the selected treatment
group, and the empty insert control is used as a standard that equals
100% viability.
Blood Interactions
Porcine blood
(Lampire Biological Laboratories, Pipersville, PA) anticoagulated
with Na-citrate upon collection was stored at 4 °C for up to
3 weeks from the bleed date. Control, 15% NTA–DEG, and 30%
NTA–DEG foams were washed and dried prior to characterization
in all studies. QuikClot Combat Gauze was included as a clinical control.
Blood absorption was analyzed by weighing dried samples (n = 3; ∼50 mg) and incubating them in blood at 37 °C.
Samples were weighed at 24 h, and blood absorption was calculated
aswhere Wb is the
mass of the sample in blood and Wd is
the dry mass.Coagulation time was measured by placing samples
(n = 4) in 1.5 mL tubes, with empty tubes serving
as negative (nonclotting) controls. Blood was brought to room temperature,
and a 1 M CaCl2 solution was added to obtain a final concentration
of 0.01 M CaCl2 and reverse the anticoagulant. Then, 50
μL of blood was added to each sample tube. At each time point
(every 6 min over 30 min), 1 mL of DI water was added to the tubes
to stop the clotting process and lyse free red blood cells. Tubes
were centrifuged (2300 rpm, 15 min), inverted, and imaged using a
digital camera. Then, 200 μL of lysate was pipetted from each
tube into a 96-well plate, and absorbance was measured at 540 nm using
a BioTek Synergy 2 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Winooski, VT) to
determine the relative amount of hemoglobin released at each time
point.
Platelet Attachment
An LDH cytotoxicity
assay kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to quantify the
attachment of platelets to samples. To obtain a standard curve, whole
blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min to obtain platelet-rich
plasma (PRP). Multiple concentrations of PRP were prepared by diluting
with PBS at 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.5% to generate a standard. Hemocytometer
counts at each PRP concentrations (n = 4) were acquired
and used to quantify standard values.SMP foams (n = 4) were cut to have equal surface areas and placed in the wells
of a 24-well plate. Gauze was used as a clinical control. Then, 1
mL of whole blood was added to each well and the plate was incubated
at 37 °C for 30 min. Nonattached platelets were washed away with
PBS. Samples were transferred to another plate containing 1 mL of
fresh PBS and 100 μL of 10% Triton X-100 and incubated at 37
°C for 1 h to lyse the attached platelets. Then, 100 μL
of supernatant was taken from each sample well and transferred to
a 96-well plate. The LDH reaction solution (100 μL) was added
to each well, and the plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C
on an orbital shaker. Following incubation, absorbances were read
on the microplate reader at 490 nm.
Platelet
Activation
SMP foams (approximately
0.5 cm3) were incubated in whole blood and rinsed of nonattached
platelets. To observe activity states and activation of the attached
platelets, samples were prepared for SEM imaging. Samples were fixed
in a solution of 2% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences,
Hatfield, PA) overnight at 4 °C. Following fixation, samples
were dehydrated in solutions with increasing concentrations of ethanol:
(1) 30 min in 50% ethanol, (2) 30 min in 70% ethanol, (3) 30 min in
95% ethanol, and (4) 30 min in 100% ethanol. The final dehydration
was accomplished through drying overnight in a vacuum oven at room
temperature, and samples were sputter-coated with 5–10 nm of
gold. SEM analysis was performed using a Jeol NeoSCope JCM-5000 scanning
electron microscope at an operating voltage of 10 kV. Random regions
of interest were imaged at 1000× and 5000× magnifications.
Images were analyzed qualitatively for signs of platelet aggregation
and morphology change.
Degradation Analysis
Cylindrical
foams (n = 8, 8 mm diameter, 1 cm height) were washed
and dried, and initial masses were obtained using a gravimetric scale.
Samples were placed in 3% H2O2 (real-time oxidative
degradation media) or in 0.1 M NaOH (accelerated hydrolytic degradation
media) at 37 °C. Every 3 days, the degradation media was changed.
At selected time points, samples were washed with ethanol and dried
under vacuum for 24 h. After drying, samples were imaged using a camera,
and masses were measured (n = 5). A thin slice was
cut from a sacrificial set of foams (n = 3) and used
to measure pore morphology, Tg, and surface
chemistry as described above.
Statistical
Analysis
Measurements
are presented as mean ± standard deviations. Student’s t tests were performed to determine differences between
NTA–DEG foams and controls. Statistical significance was taken
as p < 0.05.
Results
Structural Properties
All formulations
had a pore size of approximately 1100 μm, and both NTA–DEG
formulations had comparable pore sizes to the control (Figure ). In general, foam densities
were low (<0.06 g/cm3) for all formulations, demonstrating
that the NTA–DEG monomer can be incorporated into low-density
foams. The addition of NTA–DEG resulted in pore opening, with
interconnects visible in pore walls (Figure c), which corresponds with a significantly
reduced density in the 30% NTA–DEG foams relative to that of
the control foam.
Figure 2
Structural properties of synthesized foams. (a) Average
pore size
of foams (n = 6) measured using SEM micrographs and
subsequent SEM analysis. (b) Foam densities (n =
3). (c) Representative SEM micrographs of foam samples used for pore
analysis. Scale bar of 1000 μm applies to all images. Average
± standard deviation displayed in panels (a) and (b). *p < 0.05 relative to control foam.
Structural properties of synthesized foams. (a) Average
pore size
of foams (n = 6) measured using SEM micrographs and
subsequent SEM analysis. (b) Foam densities (n =
3). (c) Representative SEM micrographs of foam samples used for pore
analysis. Scale bar of 1000 μm applies to all images. Average
± standard deviation displayed in panels (a) and (b). *p < 0.05 relative to control foam.
Thermal Properties
The use of polyol
cross-linkers with three (TEA and NTA–DEG) and four (HPED)
hydroxyl groups provides an amorphous, highly cross-linked network
that is indicated by the absence of melting peaks in the DSC plots.
The shape memory properties are designed around the dry and wet Tg’s of the system. Figure a shows that all foam formulations have dry Tg’s over 40°C, which ensures that
the biomaterials maintain their compressed secondary shape when stored
in dry conditions. The wet Tg’s
are reduced to below 37 °C due to plasticization of the network
by water, as shown in Figure b, which allows for the actuation of shape memory properties
after exposure to water in body-temperature blood upon implantation.
Figure 3
Thermal
and shape memory properties of SMP foams. Tg measured via differential scanning calorimetry under
(a) dry and (b) wet conditions (n = 3). *p < 0.05 relative to control. Horizontal lines indicate
body temperature (37 °C). (c) Volumetric swelling ratios in water
at 5 min and 24 h at 37 °C (n = 3). (d) Volume
recovery profiles of foam samples in deionized water at 37 °C
(n = 3). Average ± standard deviation displayed
for all data.
Thermal
and shape memory properties of SMP foams. Tg measured via differential scanning calorimetry under
(a) dry and (b) wet conditions (n = 3). *p < 0.05 relative to control. Horizontal lines indicate
body temperature (37 °C). (c) Volumetric swelling ratios in water
at 5 min and 24 h at 37 °C (n = 3). (d) Volume
recovery profiles of foam samples in deionized water at 37 °C
(n = 3). Average ± standard deviation displayed
for all data.
Hydrophilicity
and Shape Memory Behavior
Swelling ratios in water were calculated
to provide an indication
of material hydrophilicity (Figure c). Control foams swelled by 55% in 5 min, and the
effective swelling after 24 h was 56%. Similarly, 30% NTA–DEG
swelled by 64% in 5 min and 51% in 24 h, while 15% NTA–DEG
swelled a significantly lower amount of 15% in 5 min and 23% in 24
h. The statistically similar swelling ratios at the 5 min and 24 h
time points indicate that equilibrium swelling is reached within the
first 5 min of water incubation with these foams. Shape memory properties
of foams are required to ensure that they expand to their original
shape after implantation and exposure to body-temperature blood. The
volume recovery profiles of the foams in water at 37 °C are shown
in Figure d. Control
foams expanded back to their original shape within ∼200 s,
while NTA–DEG foams reached a 100% volume recovery within ∼25
s.
Tensile Testing
Mechanical testing
data are presented in Table . In general, elastic modulus and tensile strength decreased
and maximum elongation increased with the addition of NTA–DEG.
These trends were observed in both dry and wet/plasticized conditions.
Relative differences in elastic modulus were reduced in wet conditions
(15× and 41× decreases between control and 15 and 30% NTA–DEG,
respectively, in dry condition vs 6× and 10× decreases in
wet condition). Tensile strength was similar between samples in the
wet state, and ultimate elongation differences increased in wet conditions.
Table 2
Tensile Properties of Shape Memory
Polymer Foams in Dry and Wet Conditionsa
dry
wet
sample
elastic
modulus (kPa)
ultimate tensile strength
(kPa)
maximum elongation (mm/m)
elastic modulus
(kPa)
ultimate tensile strength (kPa)
maximum elongation (mm/m)
Control
3216 ± 1669
528 ± 230
0.17 ± 0.04
153 ± 22
53 ± 21
0.36 ± 0.19
15% NTA–DEG
217 ± 86*
69 ± 26*
0.39 ± 0.20
24 ± 5*
45 ± 20
1.73 ± 0.39
30% NTA–DEG
78 ± 33*
94 ± 7*
1.39 ± 0.60*
15 ± 3*
70 ± 24
4.53 ± 1.34*
n = 3, average
± standard deviation displayed. *p < 0.05
relative to control.
n = 3, average
± standard deviation displayed. *p < 0.05
relative to control.
Cell and Blood Interactions
Cell
viability was >75% for all samples over 72 h (Figure a). Control foams absorbed
significantly
more blood than gauze and NTA–DEG foams (Figure b). The lowest blood absorption was measured
in 15% NTA–DEG foams, followed by 30% NTA–DEG foams.
Clotting times were measured relative to a gauze clinical control
(Figure c). At 6 min,
all SMP foams had significantly higher free red blood cells (RBCs)
relative to the gauze clinical control, indicative of reduced clotting.
However, by 12 min, all samples had comparable clotting levels. Images
of lysates can be viewed in Figure S2 in
the Supporting Information.
Figure 4
Cell and blood interactions with SMP foams.
(a) 3T3 fibroblast
viability over 3, 24, and 72 h (n = 3). (b) Blood
absorption over 24 h at 37 °C (n = 3). *p < 0.05 between all four samples. (c) Blood clotting
times in terms of free red blood cells (RBCs) relative to gauze clinical
control over 30 min (n = 4). *p <
0.05 relative to gauze. (d) Platelet attachment concentrations measured
using the LDH assay (n = 4). *p <
0.05 relative to gauze. †p < 0.05 relative
to control foam. Average ± standard deviation displayed for all
data.
Cell and blood interactions with SMP foams.
(a) 3T3 fibroblast
viability over 3, 24, and 72 h (n = 3). (b) Blood
absorption over 24 h at 37 °C (n = 3). *p < 0.05 between all four samples. (c) Blood clotting
times in terms of free red blood cells (RBCs) relative to gauze clinical
control over 30 min (n = 4). *p <
0.05 relative to gauze. (d) Platelet attachment concentrations measured
using the LDH assay (n = 4). *p <
0.05 relative to gauze. †p < 0.05 relative
to control foam. Average ± standard deviation displayed for all
data.
Platelet
Attachment and Activation
Decreasing concentrations of PRP
resulted in a linear decrease in
platelet numbers that could be used to quantify the concentrations
of attached platelets on samples using the LDH assay. As shown in Figure d, the highest levels
of platelet attachment were observed on the gauze clinical control,
followed by the SMP control foam. Ester-containing foams had a significantly
lower concentration of attached platelets compared to that of the
controls. Platelets were found on all materials in SEM images. The
granules released from the cytoplasm of platelets upon activation
after attachment can be visualized by the small protrusions seen in Figure . The gauze clinical
control contained areas of thrombus formation, indicating that platelets
attached, aggregated, and activated during the 30 min of whole blood
incubation. All SMP formulations showed evidence of platelet attachment
and activation. Aggregates were found on control and 15% NTA–DEG
samples, while 30% NTA–DEG samples had lower platelet density.
Figure 5
SEM micrographs
of attached and activated platelets after incubation
in whole porcine blood. Scale bars apply to all images in a given
column.
SEM micrographs
of attached and activated platelets after incubation
in whole porcine blood. Scale bars apply to all images in a given
column.
Degradation
Analysis
Mass Loss and Physical Erosion
Despite the inclusion of hydrolytically degradable ester linkages,
NTA–DEG foams were relatively stable in 0.1 M NaOH (Figure b). They lost ∼20%
of their mass within 1–2 weeks, after which mass loss plateaued.
The remainder of the hydrolytic degradation characterization data
can be found in Figures S3–S5 in
the Supporting Information. In 3% H2O2, the
30% NTA–DEG foams underwent linear mass loss (R2 = 0.953) over 30 days (Figure a). The 15% NTA–DEG foams had a consistent,
linear mass loss (R2 = 0.976) in 3% H2O2 with full degradation at 100 days. Control foams
have initially slow degradation rates, and the rate increased around
42 days until 100% degradation within 72 days (R2 = 0.894). In general, NTA–DEG foams remained in a
single piece throughout the degradation process, which indicates that
surface erosion occurred in these samples, while control foams started
to break apart into smaller pieces after ∼42 days (Figure ).
Figure 6
Mass loss of samples
as a function of time (n =
5) in (a) real-time oxidative degradation media (3% H2O2) and (b) accelerated hydrolytic degradation media (0.1 M
NaOH). Average ± standard deviation displayed.
Figure 7
Erosion profile and glass-transition temperatures of samples during
degradation in 3% H2O2. No sample was available
for imaging upon almost complete degradation at ∼28 days for
30% NTA–DEG foams and at ∼84 days for controls.
Mass loss of samples
as a function of time (n =
5) in (a) real-time oxidative degradation media (3% H2O2) and (b) accelerated hydrolytic degradation media (0.1 M
NaOH). Average ± standard deviation displayed.Erosion profile and glass-transition temperatures of samples during
degradation in 3% H2O2. No sample was available
for imaging upon almost complete degradation at ∼28 days for
30% NTA–DEG foams and at ∼84 days for controls.
Thermal Analysis
Variations in Tg throughout degradation
provide an indication
of relative cross-link densities over time. This information can be
used to determine if the materials undergo bulk degradation, where
the entire network is attacked at once, or surface degradation, where
the network remains relatively stable.[27−29] Retained Tg’s throughout the degradation time frame, as shown
in Figure , indicate
that the polymer networks remained fairly intact and that degradation
occurred primarily on the surface of the materials. This is expected
for oxidative degradation due to the high reactivity of reactive oxygen
species.[30] The 15% NTA–DEG foam Tg dropped at 70 days, indicating that bulk hydrolysis
may take over as the primary degradation mechanism at this point.[29]
Pore Morphology
Pore morphology
of foams was observed every 2 weeks via SEM, as shown in Figure . In the case of
control foams in 3% H2O2, the pores began to
collapse by 14 days with significant strut breakage by 28 days. Total
pore collapse at 42 days corresponds to the macroscale breaking apart
of control foams shown in Figure . Pore morphology was the most stable in the 15% NTA–DEG
foams, with visible pores and interconnects as late as 42 days, despite
the increased mass loss in these samples in comparison with the controls
(69 ± 5% remaining in control vs 45 ± 9% remaining in 15%
NTA–DEG). The 30% NTA–DEG foams degraded too much for
imaging by the 28 day time point, and evidence of significant degradation
(loss of struts) can be seen by 14 days.
Figure 8
SEM micrographs of samples
throughout 10 weeks of degradation in
3% H2O2. 30% NTA–DEG degraded completely
by the 28 day time point. Scale bar of 1000 μm applies to all
images.
SEM micrographs of samples
throughout 10 weeks of degradation in
3% H2O2. 30% NTA–DEG degraded completely
by the 28 day time point. Scale bar of 1000 μm applies to all
images.
Spectroscopic
Analysis
As seen
in Figure , a shift
in the carbonyl of urethane peak from 1680 to 1688 cm–1 and a reduction in the tertiary amine of HPED and TEA (and NTA for
ester-containing foams) at 1050 cm–1 are an indication
of oxidative degradation across all of the formulations, as previously
shown.[19,23] Among the NTA–DEG foams, an increase
in the carbonyl of the carboxylic acid peak at 1650 cm–1 is attributed to the carboxylic acid byproduct formation during
hydrolytic cleaving of ester linkages.
Figure 9
FTIR spectra of (a) control,
(b) 15% NTA–DEG, and (c) 30%
NTA–DEG throughout 10 weeks of degradation in 3% H2O2. 30% NTA–DEG degraded completely after the 21
day time point.
FTIR spectra of (a) control,
(b) 15% NTA–DEG, and (c) 30%
NTA–DEG throughout 10 weeks of degradation in 3% H2O2. 30% NTA–DEG degraded completely after the 21
day time point.
Discussion
Foam Characterization
The addition
of NTA–DEG as a monomer aided in opening the pores, as demonstrated
by pinholes in pore walls (Figure c). This increased interconnectivity between pores
may be attributed to the hydrophilicity of DEG. Namely, the relatively
hydrophilic DEG component increases interactions between the prepolymer/monomers
and the water blowing agent and/or surfactant to aid in pore opening.
Previous attempts to increase interconnectivity in SMP foams rely
upon mechanical reticulation, plasma treatment, and/or use of physical
blowing agents.[31,32] Inclusion of more hydrophilic
monomers presents a new method for pore opening in these materials.
This interconnectivity could increase nutrient transfer throughout
the biomaterial scaffold, as well as allow for tissue and blood vessel
ingrowth, and it expands potential future applications for SMP foams
in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.[33,34]In general, SMPs contain two main components at the molecular
level, known as net points and switching segments.[35] Net points define the permanent shape of the SMP. In this
specific material system, the net points are covalent cross-links
that form during synthesis (urethane linkages that form upon reaction
with hydroxyls with isocyanates). Switching segments provide the mechanism
for shape memory. In this specific system, the switching segments
are hydrogen bonds that form between urethane linkages in between
the cross-links. At temperatures above the Tg, hydrogen bonds are broken between the network chains to
increase flexibility, making the material elastic. This elasticity
allows for deformation (radial crimping in this case) into the secondary
shape. Upon cooling below the Tg, new
hydrogen bonds form between chains that have been rearranged during
crimping, again limiting SMP flexibility and fixing the temporary
shape. Upon exposure to body temperature water after shape fixation,
the hydrogen bonds between the urethane linkages are interrupted by
water plasticization that reduces the Tg and triggers shape recovery at a relatively lower temperature in
the wet condition.A reduction in dry Tg of 30% NTA–DEG
foams can be attributed to the longer chain length and increased flexibility
of NTA–DEG monomers, which theoretically reduces the overall
cross-link density and network rigidity. Plasticization after exposure
to water reduces the Tg in the wet state
and enables actuation after exposure to body temperature (37 °C
water). All foams have wet Tg below 37
°C. It was originally hypothesized that NTA–DEG foams
may have lower wet Tg due to the hydrophilic
DEG chains; however, wet Tg’s were
statistically similar for the three foam formulations. The retained
wet Tg of NTA–DEG foams as compared
to controls is attributed to intermolecular bonding between the dipoles
of ester linkages.Previous research on polyurethane foams shows
that the materials
primarily hydrogen-bond with water through the N–H groups rather
than through the C=O linkages, based upon Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectra.[36] Namely, when
hydrogen bonds form at the N–H groups, the N–H infrared
band at ∼3307 cm–1 increases in intensity
and shifts to higher wavenumbers. When hydrogen bonding occurs via
bridges between two C=O groups, the FTIR spectra show an increase
in the intensity of the C=O peak at ∼1687 cm–1 with shifts to lower wavenumbers. In the current study, we collected
FTIR spectra on foams that had been submerged in water at 50 °C
for 5 min and compared those with dry foam spectra (shown in Figure S6 in the Supporting Information). The
N–H peak intensities increased with general shifts to higher
wavenumbers in the wet foam spectra, indicating the presence of hydrogen
bonds between water and the N–H groups in the urethane linkages.
Meanwhile, the C=O peaks at ∼1687 cm–1 were of similar intensity between the wet and dry samples, with
no apparent shift in wavenumber, indicating minimal hydrogen bonding
between these groups in these materials. These FTIR spectra support
the hypothesis that the dipole–dipole bonds in these foams
are less susceptible to water plasticization via hydrogen bonding,
which would correlate with reduced effects on wet Tg in this system.This hypothesis also correlates
with the foam swelling ratios in
water. Namely, there is a drop in swelling in the 15% NTA–DEG
foams that may be attributed to the dipole–dipole bonds with
reduced water access. With an increase in the NTA–DEG content
to 30%, the hydrophilicity of DEG overcomes these restrictions to
increase water interactions with the network. The faster volume recovery
observed with NTA–DEG foams is likely due to the open pore
structure, which enables faster water penetration and shape recovery
from the compressed form. This property could be beneficial for hemostatic
dressing use, as it would allow for faster wound filling after implantation.[37]Based on the theoretically reduced cross-link
density and open
pore structure in NTA–DEG foams, the dry mechanical property
trends (decreased elastic modulus and tensile strength and increased
ultimate elongation with NTA–DEG incorporation) were generally
expected. Some of these differences could also be attributed to the
reduced density of 30% NTA–DEG foams. The smaller differences
in modulus and strength between NTA–DEG foams and controls
in the wet state are again attributed to secondary intermolecular
forces in the samples. The carbonyl linkages of the ester groups interact
via secondary dipole interactions that are less affected by water
in comparison with the hydrogen bonds between urethane linkages. Thus,
plasticization does not affect the NTA–DEG foam flexibility
to the same extent as that of control foams. While the wet mechanical
properties are more similar between formulations, it may be beneficial
to tune the stiffness of NTA–DEG foams in future studies by
increasing HPED content or decreasing diisocyanate monomer chain length
with butane diisocyanate in place of HDI.
Biological
Characterization
All of
the foams retained high cytocompatibility (>75%) over 72 h, which
meets the ISO 10993 standard for cytocompatibility.[38] Future studies will focus on measuring cytocompatibility
of degradation products and in vivo host response during degradation
to provide a better understanding of the material biocompatibility.
The absorbed blood amounts generally correlate with swelling ratios
in water, with the control foam having the highest volume of absorbed
blood and 15% NTA–DEG having the lowest volume. The decrease
in blood absorption in the 30% NTA–DEG foam relative to the
control foam could be attributed to the open pore structure, which
likely reduced the amount of retained (anticoagulated) blood after
removal.Clotting times were measured relative to gauze. SMP
foams all had slower clotting times with increased free RBCs at 0
and 6 min. However, by 12 min, all samples had fully clotted with
no differences between free RBC levels. In general, the 30% NTA–DEG
foam appeared to clot the slowest of the tested formulations. This
trend was also seen in the platelet attachment numbers, where gauze
had the highest number of platelets, followed by the control foam.
The NTA–DEG foams had the lowest platelet numbers. The platelet
images correlate with these results based on evidence of more advanced
thrombus formation on the gauze sample. All SMP formulations promoted
platelet attachment and activation, demonstrated by the protrusions
on individual platelets. Control and 15% NTA–DEG foams had
areas with platelet aggregates, a precursor to thrombus formation.
The 30% NTA–DEG foams had the lowest levels of imaged platelet
numbers and aggregates.Interestingly, in our preliminary in
vivo experiments in a porcine
liver injury,[39] treatment with control
foams slightly reduced blood loss and significantly increased animal
survival in comparison with gauze treatment. Thus, based upon comparisons
between gauze and control SMP foams, the in vivo clotting process
is more complex than we are able to replicate with these initial in
vitro studies and likely requires further investigation in less static
conditions. However, it does appear that the modification with degradable
NTA–DEG reduces the clotting capabilities of SMP foams. One
of the main benefits of the SMP foam system is its synthetic tunability.
We have parallel work that involves incorporation of antimicrobial
phenolic acids into SMP foams to reduce infection risks.[40] In addition to their antimicrobial properties,
phenolic acids demonstrate procoagulant activity.[41,42] Future work will focus on incorporating procoagulant species, such
as phenolic acids, into the NTA–DEG foams to increase their
clotting capabilities while maintaining the desired degradation profiles,
open pore structures, and flexible mechanical properties.
Degradation Profiles
Control SMP
foams have excellent hydrolytic stability. Despite the incorporation
of hydrolytically labile ester linkages in NTA–DEG foams, they
were very stable in accelerated hydrolytic degradation media after
an initial drop in mass by ∼20% at the first time point. We
hypothesize that this stability could be due to (i) relative hydrophobicity
around the ester linkages to reduce water penetration into the network
and (ii) initial degradation of only ester linkages and loss of NTA
from the polymer, after which the remainder of the network was stable
in 0.1 M NaOH. Based on prior studies showing that control foams degrade
via oxidation of tertiary amines in HPED and TEA monomers, we hypothesized
that NTA–DEG foams may degrade more quickly in oxidative conditions.[19,23] As the network degrades oxidatively, it becomes more hydrophilic,
enabling increased water access to the hydrolytically degradable ester
linkages to promote hydrolysis. Thus, degradation characterization
was focused on samples in oxidative media (3% H2O2). Control foams had an initially slow degradation rate with an apparent
increase in the rate at ∼42 days. The change in degradation
rate of control foams is consistent with previous SMP foam degradation
studies and corresponds with the observed erosion profile.[19,23] This result could be attributed to the relative brittleness of control
foams (higher elastic modulus) that causes bulk erosion upon exposure
to external forces during the characterization process. Namely, the
foams are washed, dried, and weighed every 3–7 days. Increased
brittleness can cause samples to break apart over time of repeated
external force application. The nonlinear mass loss rates and differences
in erosion profiles would likely affect tissue regeneration and load
transfer in vivo as well and make estimation of in vivo degradation
rates more complex.[43−45]The NTA–DEG monomer was designed to
provide multiple potential degradation points. NTA contains a tertiary
amine similar to HPED and TEA, which has been previously shown to
break down into carboxylic acid and ammonia byproducts.[46] The carboxylic acid groups locally decrease
pH within the scaffold, which can accelerate hydrolysis of the ester
linkages between NTA and DEG. Finally, DEG contains ether linkages,
which (i) enhance hydrophilicity adjacent to the ester linkage to
increase water access and (ii) may also degrade oxidatively. Ether
oxidation produces carboxylic acids, alcohols, and aldehydes, and
the carboxylic acids can further catalyze ester hydrolysis.[15] During the ether degradation process, there
is a possibility that the carbon radicals can cross-link with each
other to form cross-links. While cross-linking was not visible on
the FTIR spectra (would be indicated by branched ether peak at ∼1172
cm–1), it is possible that ether cross-linking occurred
simultaneously to oxidative and hydrolytic degradation in 15% NTA–DEG
foams to provide a more linear degradation profile and reduce bulk
erosion.The degradation rate of NTA–DEG foams can be
easily tuned
with variations in the NTA–DEG content. We hypothesize that
degradation rates could be further controlled with other monomer variables,
such as diisocyanate length, monomer hydrophobicity, and polyol functionality.
These foams have linear in vitro mass loss rates that, if replicated
in vivo, could be highly beneficial for graded load transfer from
scaffolds to tissues during healing, particularly when considering
the highly interconnected pores. While the focus of the current work
is on hemorrhage control, these foams provide a potential platform
for tissue engineering scaffolds in future work.
Conclusions
This study reveals that incorporation of ester
linkages using the
new NTA–DEG monomer can increase the degradation rate of polyurethane
SMP foams to clinically relevant time frames of 4–8 weeks[24] while maintaining desired thermal properties.
Namely, a dry Tg above 40 °C ensures
that the foams can be stored in their secondary shape, and a wet Tg below body temperature enables expansion to
the primary shape after implantation. The new monomer also imparted
other potentially valuable foam properties, including interconnects
between the pores that may aid in tissue regeneration, very rapid
volume recovery within 30 s to aid in hemostatic dressing delivery,
and increased flexibility to potentially reduce tears or premature
breakdown of scaffolds during delivery or healing. Incorporation of
NTA–DEG reduced the clotting capabilities of SMP foams; thus,
future studies with these foams will include incorporation of procoagulant
species into the tunable material system. Beyond hemorrhage control,
these foams provide a platform for future development into other regenerative
medicine applications where scaffold degradation is desired.
Authors: Nicholas Bryan; Helen Ahswin; Neil Smart; Yves Bayon; Stephen Wohlert; John A Hunt Journal: Eur Cell Mater Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Jennifer N Rodriguez; Matthew W Miller; Anthony Boyle; John Horn; Cheng-Kang Yang; Thomas S Wilson; Jason M Ortega; Ward Small; Landon Nash; Hunter Skoog; Duncan J Maitland Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2014-08-11
Authors: Brian J Eastridge; Robert L Mabry; Peter Seguin; Joyce Cantrell; Terrill Tops; Paul Uribe; Olga Mallett; Tamara Zubko; Lynne Oetjen-Gerdes; Todd E Rasmussen; Frank K Butler; Russ S Kotwal; Russell S Kotwal; John B Holcomb; Charles Wade; Howard Champion; Mimi Lawnick; Leon Moores; Lorne H Blackbourne Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.313