Literature DB >> 34566460

Relative sensitivity of duckweed Lemna minor and six algae to seven herbicides.

Koji Ueda1, Takashi Nagai1.   

Abstract

We investigated the relative sensitivity of duckweed Lemna minor and six species of algae to seven herbicides, using an efficient high-throughput microplate-based toxicity assay. First, we assessed the sensitivity of L. minor to the seven herbicides, and then we compared its sensitivity to that of previously published data for six algal species based on EC50 values. For five herbicides, the most sensitive species differed: L. minor was most sensitive to cyclosulfamuron: Raphidocelis subcapitata was most sensitive to pretilachlor and esprocarb: Desmodesmus subspicatus was most sensitive to pyraclonil; and Navicula pelliculosa was most sensitive to pyrazoxyfen. Simetryn was evenly toxic to all species, whereas 2,4-D was evenly less toxic, with only small differences in species sensitivity. These results suggested that a single algal species cannot represent the sensitivity of the primary producer assemblage to a given herbicide. Therefore, to assess the ecological effects of herbicides, aquatic plant and multispecies algal toxicity data sets are essential. © Pesticide Science Society of Japan 2021. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  aquatic plant; aquatic primary producer assemblages; ecological risk; growth inhibition test; microplate toxicity assay; species sensitivity index

Year:  2021        PMID: 34566460      PMCID: PMC8422251          DOI: 10.1584/jpestics.D21-018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pestic Sci        ISSN: 1348-589X            Impact factor:   2.529


  11 in total

1.  Dose-response relationships between herbicides with different modes of action and growth of Lemna paucicostata: an improved ecotoxicological method.

Authors:  Albrecht Michel; Robert D Johnson; Stephen O Duke; Brian E Scheffler
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface.

Authors:  Sergi Sabater; Helena Guasch; Marta Ricart; Anna Romaní; Gemma Vidal; Christina Klünder; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  The use of phytotoxicity tests (common duckweed, cabbage, and millet) for determining effluent toxicity.

Authors:  W Wang; J M Williams
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Comparative toxicity of 20 herbicides to 5 periphytic algae and the relationship with mode of action.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai; Kiyoshi Taya; Ikuko Yoda
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing.

Authors:  W Wang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 68 pesticides used in Japanese paddy fields.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 1.519

7.  Screening-level risk assessment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate for aquatic organisms using monitoring data in Japan.

Authors:  Wataru Naito; Yoshihiro Gamo; Kikuo Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  The toxicity of herbicides to non-target aquatic plants and algae: assessment of predictive factors and hazard.

Authors:  Nina Cedergreen; Jens C Streibig
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.845

9.  Sensitivity ofLemna bioassay interacts with stock-culture period.

Authors:  O Christen; C Theuer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.