| Literature DB >> 34565440 |
Yumei Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Yulong Wu2, Hua Liu1,3,4,5, Wenci Gong1,3,4,5, Yuan Hu1,3,4,5, Yujuan Shen1,3,4,5, Jianping Cao6,7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD4+ T helper (Th) cells play critical roles in both host humoral and cellular immunity against parasitic infection and in the immunopathology of schistosomiasis. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are a specialized subset of Th cells involved in immunity against infectious diseases. However, the role of Tfh cells in schistosome infection is not fully understood. In this study, the dynamics and roles of Tfh cell regulation were examined. We demonstrated that granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSC) can suppress the proliferation of Tfh cells.Entities:
Keywords: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Programmed cell death ligand 1; Programmed cell death protein 1; Schistosoma japonicum; T follicular helper cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34565440 PMCID: PMC8474882 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-05006-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1a–dKinetics of T helper type 1 (Th1), Th2 and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in Schistosoma japonicum infection. Each mouse was infected with 20 cercariae of S. japonicum and five mice were sacrificed at 0 (before infection), 3, 5, 8 and 13 weeks post-infection. Splenocytes were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of brefeldin A in complete Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium for 6 h. Cells were stained with anti-CD3 PE-cy5.5 and anti-CD4 fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and were then intracellularly stained with anti-IFN-γ PE, anti-IL-4 PE or isotype IgG2a control antibody for the analysis of Th1 or Th2 cells. Single-cell suspensions of splenocytes were stained with anti-CD3 PE-cy5.5, anti-CD4 FITC, anti-CXCR5 allophycocyanin (APC) or isotype IgG2a control antibody for Tfh cells. All of the values were gated on CD3+CD4+ cells. a Kinetics of the percentages of Tfh cells amongst total CD4+ T cells from mouse spleens determined using flow cytometry. b Kinetics of the percentage of Th1 amongst total CD4+ T cells from mouse spleens determined using flow cytometry. c Kinetics of percentage of Th2 amongst total CD4+ T cells from mouse spleens determined using flow cytometry. d Comparison of the dynamics of Th1/Th2/Tfh in mice infected with S. japonicum. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of 25 mice from three independent experiments
Fig. 2a–dAnalysis of Tfh stimulated by soluble egg antigen (SEA) and soluble worm antigen (SWA). For each of three independent immunization experiments, C57BL/6 mice (five per group) were injected subcutaneously in the back with 200 μl of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant containing 50 μg of SEA, 50 μg of SWA or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), boosted twice at 14-day intervals. Single-cell splenocyte suspensions of mice were prepared 2 weeks after the final injection. For each of three independent in vitro experiments, splenocytes of C57BL/6 normal mice were stimulated with PBS, final concentration of 10 μg/ml SEA or SWA for 72 h at 37 ℃. The splenocytes were stained with anti-CD4 FITC and anti-CXCR5 APC or isotype IgG2a control antibody for Tfh cells. a Analysis of Tfh stimulated by SEA and SWA in vivo by flow cytometry. b Comparison of Tfh stimulated by SEA and SWA in vivo. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (****P < 0.0001). d Analysis of Tfh stimulated by SEA and SWA in vitro by flow cytometry. d Comparison of Tfh stimulated by SEA and SWA in vitro (**P < 0.01). Cells were gated on the CD3+CD4+ population for analysis of Tfh cells. MDSC Myeloid-derived suppressor cells, CFSE 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate N-succinimidyl ester; for other abbreviations, see Fig. 1
Fig. 3a–cTfh cell proliferation monitored by CFSE labelling. CD4+CXCR5+ Tfh cells of C57BL/6 normal mice were sorted by flow cytometry, and CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSC of Schistosoma japonicum-infected C57BL/6 mice were sorted by the Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Isolation Kit. CFSE-labelled Tfh cells (1 × 105/well) were cultured either unstimulated (a), stimulated with anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (2 μg/ml) (b), or stimulated with anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (2 μg/ml) plus MDSC (2 × 105/well) (c). Cells were harvested after 5 days to analyse the CFSE fluorescence intensity of Tfh by flow cytometry. For abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2
Fig. 4a–cThe expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on Tfh cells and the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on MDSC infected with Schistosoma japonicum. Each mouse was infected with 20 cercariae of S. japonicum and five mice were sacrificed at 0 (before infection) and 3, 5, and 8 weeks (wk) post-infection. Single-cell suspensions of splenocytes were stained with anti-CD4 FITC, anti-CXCR5 APC, anti-PD-1 PE (for Tfh cells) and anti-CD11b APC, anti-Gr-1 PerCP-cy5.5, anti-PD-L1 PE (for MDSC cells). a The expression of PD-1 on Tfh cells of mice infected with S. japonicum. b The expression of PD-L1 on MDSC of mice infected with S. japonicum. c The expression and trend of PD-1 and PD-L1 at different infection times (0, 3, 5, 8 weeks). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. For other abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2
Fig. 5Granulocytic-MDSC (G-MDSC) inhibit Tfh cell differentiation through the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway under Tfh-cell-polarizing conditions. CD4+CD44lowCD62Lhigh-naïve T cells were sorted from normal C57BL/6 mice splenocytes by the EasySep Mouse Naïve CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit. G-MDSC and M-MDSC were sorted from Schistosoma japonicum infected mice by the Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Isolation Kit. Naïve CD4+ T cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were co-cultured with G-MDSC or M-MDSC at a ratio of 1:2 (T cell/MDSC) in the presence of anti-CD3, anti-CD28, anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4, IL-21 in 24-well plates for 5 days. PD-L1 blocking antibodies and isotypes were used at 5 μg/ml. The percentage of CD4+CXCR5+ Tfh in different groups (a with G-MDSC, c with M-MDSC). Comparison of Tfh in different groups (b with G-MDSC, d with M-MDSC). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA followed by least significant difference test, ****P < 0.0001. For other abbreviations, see Figs. 1, 2 and 4