Literature DB >> 34565429

Pneumocystis pneumonia risk among viral acute respiratory distress syndrome related or not to COVID 19.

Keyvan Razazi1,2, Romain Arrestier3,4,5, Francoise Botterel6,7, Armand Mekontso Dessap1,2,8, Anne Fleur Haudebourg1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34565429      PMCID: PMC8474854          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03767-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
Lymphopenia, corticosteroids and immunomodulatory therapeutics frequently used in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) may be contributing factors to opportunistic infection such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). We conducted a retrospective study to compare the prevalence of PCP between patients with C-ARDS and those with non-SARS-CoV-2 viral ARDS (NC-ARDS). Methods and some data from this cohort have been previously published [1]. There was no systematic protocol to search for PCP but in case of suspicion of PCP (respiratory symptoms with any consistent radiographic features), several analyses were performed on respiratory samples, such as broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL), blind protected sample, or sputum. It included direct examination (using May-Grünwald Giemsa (MGG), or immunofluorescence staining), detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) [2], and serum (1–3)-β-D-glucan. During the COVID-19 outbreak, immunofluorescence staining was not performed. PCP was defined as per the revised EORTC/MSGERC definition [3] as follows: proven in case of suspicion with positive direct examination; possible in case of suspicion with positive qPCR and positive BDG in ≥ 2 consecutive serum samples provided other etiologies have been excluded. SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses were not considered a priori as host factors. Patients with positive qPCR but lacking the other criteria for possible PCP were classified as colonized. The primary endpoint was the difference in prevalence of PCP between C-ARDS and NC-ARDS patients. No statistical sample size calculation was performed a priori, and sample size was equal to the number of patients treated during the study period. All patients were included only once. Between October 1, 2009, and April 29, 2020, ninety patients had C-ARDS (positive RT PCR test for SARS-CoV-2), while 82 patients had viral NC-ARDS. Our study comprises 120 patients with fungal analyses on respiratory samples obtained from 81 C-ARDS and 39 NC-ARDS patients. NC-ARDS patients had more comorbidities were more often immunocompromised, and had lower lymphocyte counts than C-ARDS patients (Table 1). C-ARDS patient received less steroid than NC-ARDS patients because they were included before randomized trials demonstrating decreased mortality with dexamethasone.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii research according to C-ARDS and NC-ARDS patients

NC-ARDS (n = 39)C-ARDS (n = 81)p-value
Age, median [IQR]61.8 [56.1–69.3]58 [52–69.5]0.32
Male gender28 (72%)65 (80%)0.30
Medical history
 Mc Cabe < 0.0001
  No underlying condition13 (33%)70 (86%)
  Ultimately fatal16 (41%)10 (12%)
  Rapidly fatal disease10 (26%)1 (1%)
 Charlson comorbidity index3 [2–4]1 [0–2] < 0.0001
 Diabetes mellitus11 (28%)38 (47%)0.051
 Congestive heart failure (NYHA 3–4)3 (8%)6 (7%) > 0.99
 Supraventricular arrhythmia5 (13%)8 (10%)0.76
 Hypertension16 (41%)52 (64%)0.016
 COPD2 (5%)8 (10%)0.50
 Chronic renal failure8 (21%)13 (16%)0.55
 Dialysis3 (8%)2 (3%)0.33
 Stroke1 (3%)3 (4%) > 0.99
 Liver cirrhosis (Child C)1 (3%)0 (0%)0.33
 Current smoking8 (21%)21 (26%)0.52
Immunosuppression conditions
 Overall32 (82%)13 (16%) < 0.0001
 Solid cancer2 (5%)4 (5%) > 0.99
 Blood cancer15 (38%)0 (0%) < 0.0001
 Organ transplant9 (23%)5 (6%)0.013
 HIV infection3 (8%)3 (4%)0.39
 Sickle cell disease1 (3%)3 (4%) > 0.99
 Others4 (10%)1 (1%)0.038
Clinical characteristics upon ICU admission
 IGS251 [37–68]35 [27–43] < 0.0001
 Baseline SOFA, median [IQR]9 [6–12]7 [4–8] < 0.0001
 ARDS classification (Berlin definition)0.046
  Mild12 (31%)10 (12%)
  Moderate18 (46%)44 (54%)
  Severe9 (23%)27 (33%)
 Norepinephrine, n (%)20 (51.3%)35 (43.2%)0.41
 Serum creatinine (µmol/L)147 [83–226]82 [66–124]0.001
 White blood cell count (× 109/L)5.4 [3–14.8]8.1 [5.5–11.9]0.44
 Lymphocyte count (× 109/L)0.4 [0.2–0.9]0.8 [0.5–1.2]0.01
 Documented bacterial co-infections18 (46%)13 (16%)< 0.0001
Treatments during the first 24 h
 Antibiotics39 (100%)81 (100%) > 0.99
 Antiviral treatment26 (67%)65 (80%)0.10
 Corticosteroids (any dose)21/38 (55%)10/79 (13%)* < 0.0001
 Corticosteroids (low dose)20/38 (53%)8/79 (10%)* < 0.0001
 Corticosteroids (high dose) #1/38 (3%)2/79 (3%)* > 0.99
ARDS treatment during ICU stay
 Corticosteroids (any dose)24 (63%)32 (41%)*0.02
 Corticosteroids (low dose)22 (58%)22 (28%)*0.002
 Corticosteroids (high dose) #2 (5%)10 (13%)*0.22
 Prone position20 (51%)71 (88%) < 0.0001
 Neuromuscular blockade25 (64%)74 (91%) < 0.0001
 Inhaled nitric oxide6 (15%)28 (35%)0.03
 Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation5 (13%)20 (25%)0.13
Organ support and outcome during ICU stay
 Renal replacement therapy during ICU stay19 (49%)29 (36%)0.18
 Norepinephrine, n (%)32 (82%)61 (75%)0.41
 ICU length of stay among survivors, days17 [10–28]30 [22–46]0.09
 Death at day 2815 (39%)30 (37%)0.88
 Death in the ICU17 (44%)32 (40%)0.67
Pneumocystis jirovecii samples and analysis
 Total samples, mean (range)1.5 (1–4)3.8 (1–15) < 0.001
 Sputum examination, mean (range)0.08 (0–1)00.01
 Broncho-alveolar lavage, mean (range)1.5 (0–4)0.19 (0–2)< 0.001
 Blind protected sample, mean (range)03.6 (1–15) < 0.001
 Direct examination (IF or MGG)1.5 (0–4)0.19 (0–2) < 0.001
 qPCR1.5 (1–4)3.8 (1–15) < 0.001
 Serum (1–3)-BDG0.5 (0–4)4 (1–10) < 0.001

COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, SAPS II = Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment, ICU = intensive care unit; *two missing values because two patients received dexamethasone or placebo in a randomized controlled trial; #denotes more than 1 mg/kg of prednisone or equivalent

Characteristics of patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii research according to C-ARDS and NC-ARDS patients COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, SAPS II = Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment, ICU = intensive care unit; *two missing values because two patients received dexamethasone or placebo in a randomized controlled trial; #denotes more than 1 mg/kg of prednisone or equivalent Pneumocystis analyses were performed on a mean of 3.1 respiratory sample per patient (range 1–15). Direct examination was performed in a total of 72 samples, with two positive cases. qPCR was performed in a total of 368 samples (294 blind protected samples, 72 BAL, and three sputum). All qPCR were negative in C-ARDS patients, while five (13%) NC-ARDS patients had at least one positive PCR, with a median cycle threshold of 36.6 [30–38.3]. Two NC-ARDS patients fulfilled proven PCP diagnostic criteria, with a positive direct examination, a single ß-D-glucan > 80 pg/mL (Table 2), and received treatment for PCP.
Table 2

Characteristics of patients with a positive Pneumocystis jirovecii qPCR

Patient, age, sexUnderlying diseaseDate of PCP diagnosisViral associationRespiratory sampleDirect examination (IFI or MGG)Pneumocystis qPCRBDG (pg/ml)*Time between ICU admission and positive sample (day)Treatment
P1, 58y, M

Diabetus mellitus

Congestive heart failure

14/01/2014Coronavirus, RhinovirusBALNegative36.7NA1No
P2, 73y, M

Renal transplantation

Diabetus mellitus

Congestive heart failure

29/08/2015CoronavirusBALPositive321060Yes (sulfamethoxazole)
P3, 52y, MMyasthenia (steroid, azathioprine)04/07/2012Respiratory syncytial virusBALNegative39.8NA1No
P4, 32y, FAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (methotrexate and aracytabine)08/01/2019MetapneumovirusBALPositive27.91880Yes (sulfamethoxazole)
P5, 67y, MCirrhosis, rheumatoid polyarthritis (steroid)22/04/2019Coronavirus NL63BALNegative36.6NA1No

M = male, F = female, P = patient; BDG = (1–3)-β-D-glucan,*BDglucan not performed in the lab before 2013. BDglucan was performed using the Fungitell kit™ (Cape Cod Inc, USA) with a positivity threshold of 80 pg/mL; qPCR of P.jirovecii was performed using a region of the mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene (LSU) after DNA extraction with a Qiasymphony kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France)

Characteristics of patients with a positive Pneumocystis jirovecii qPCR Diabetus mellitus Congestive heart failure Renal transplantation Diabetus mellitus Congestive heart failure M = male, F = female, P = patient; BDG = (1–3)-β-D-glucan,*BDglucan not performed in the lab before 2013. BDglucan was performed using the Fungitell kit™ (Cape Cod Inc, USA) with a positivity threshold of 80 pg/mL; qPCR of P.jirovecii was performed using a region of the mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene (LSU) after DNA extraction with a Qiasymphony kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) Three other NC-ARDS patients were classified as colonized, while no patient fulfilled possible PCP diagnostic criteria. Time between ICU admission and positive sample for PCP (Table 2) was short (< 2 days) like in other invasive fungal infections (i.e. invasive pulmonary aspergillosis) in severe influenza infection or ARDS. In this study of patients with viral ARDS, we found a low risk for possible or proven PCP. Our findings are in accordance with two smaller studies in France [4, 5] retrieving a low risk of Pneumocystis colonisation in COVID-19 patients. In our cohort, qPCR was positive in 13% of NC-ARDS. This result is in accordance with a previous study showing 7% of positive qPCR in ICU-admitted influenza patients [6]. The strengths of our study are the analysis of a large ARDS cohort with fungal analyses. Our study also has limitations: monocentric design, NC-ARDS patients more frequently immunocompromised, and a long cohort period.
  2 in total

1.  Study find that COVID ARDS was associated with a low risk for possible or proven PCP: still true after dexamethasone use.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Sebastien Redant; Thierry Preseau; Keitiane Kaefer; Leonel Barreto Gutierrez; Sami Anane; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in COVID-19: an overlooked clinical entity-Response to "Pneumocystis pneumonia risk among viral acute respiratory distress syndrome related or not to COVID 19".

Authors:  Antonio Riccardo Buonomo; Giulio Viceconte; Ivan Gentile
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.