| Literature DB >> 34563562 |
Jeremy Gordon1, Antonella Maselli2, Gian Luca Lancia2, Thomas Thiery3, Paul Cisek4, Giovanni Pezzulo5.
Abstract
Most current decision-making research focuses on classical economic scenarios, where choice offers are prespecified and where action dynamics play no role in the decision. However, our brains evolved to deal with different choice situations: "embodied decisions". As examples of embodied decisions, consider a lion that has to decide which gazelle to chase in the savannah or a person who has to select the next stone to jump on when crossing a river. Embodied decision settings raise novel questions, such as how people select from time-varying choice options and how they track the most relevant choice attributes; but they have long remained challenging to study empirically. Here, we summarize recent progress in the study of embodied decisions in sports analytics and experimental psychology. Furthermore, we introduce a formal methodology to identify the relevant dimensions of embodied choices (present and future affordances) and to map them into the attributes of classical economic decisions (probabilities and utilities), hence aligning them. Studying embodied decisions will greatly expand our understanding of what decision-making is.Entities:
Keywords: Action-perception loop; Affordances; Embodied decisions; Planning
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34563562 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev ISSN: 0149-7634 Impact factor: 8.989