Literature DB >> 34562146

Cohnella cholangitidis sp. nov., a novel species of the genus Cohnella isolated from a clinical specimen in Korea.

Joon Ki Kim1, Chi-Hwan Choi1,2, Dae-Won Kim1, Su Yeon Kim1, Kyu Jam Hwang3, Woo-Kon Lee4, Min Kyoung Shin4, Myunghwan Jung4, Young Sill Choi5.   

Abstract

A Gram-positive, aerobic, rod-shaped bacterium, designated as strain 1605-214T, was isolated from the blood sample of a patient with cholangitis. Based on its 16S rRNA gene sequence, the strain 1605-214T belonged to the genus Cohnella and exhibited 97.9% sequence identity with Cohnella luojiensis DSM 24270T (GQ214052). DNA-DNA hybridization, digital DNA-DNA hybridization, and average nucleotide identity values between the two species were 23% ± 1.9, 21.1%, and 77.2%, respectively. The cellular fatty acids of strain 1605-214T were mainly comprised of anteiso-C15:0 (36.1%), iso-C16:0 (16.5%), and C16:0 (15.1%). The predominant quinone was menaquinone-7; predominant polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, and aminophospholipid-1. The cell wall peptidoglycan of strain 1605-214T contained meso-diaminopimelic acid. DNA G + C content of strain 1605-214T was 50.6 mol%. 5187 genes out of a total of 5413 (94.6%) were assigned putative functions using eggNOG v5.0. Based on genotypic characteristics and genomic sequence analysis results, strain 1605-214T was confirmed to represent a novel species of genus Cohnella, for which the name Cohnella cholangitidis sp. nov., was proposed.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohnella cholangitidis; Complete genome; Human blood; Novel species; Taxonomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34562146      PMCID: PMC8475853          DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02565-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Microbiol        ISSN: 0302-8933            Impact factor:   2.552


Introduction

The first species of the genus Cohnella was described as Cohnella thermotolerans in a report by Kämpfer et al (2006). Currently, the genus Cohnella comprises 37 species (LPSN: http://www.bacterio.net), including six that have not been validated. Most members of Cohnella were isolated from various environments such as soil (Cai et al. 2010; Kim et al. 2010, 2011), plants (Garcia-Fraile et al. 2008), water (Shiratori et al. 2010), and industrial materials (Kämpfer et al. 2006). Cohnella cellulosilytica (Khianngam et al. 2012) and Cohnella faecalis (Zhu et al. 2019) were isolated from animal excrements. Cohnella hongkongensis (Kämpfer et al. 2006) and Cohnella massiliensis (Abou Abdallah et al. 2019) were isolated from clinical samples (Table S1). In the present study, we have described strain 1605-214T as a novel species of the genus Cohnella. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which a strain has been isolated from the blood culture of a cholangitis patient in South Korea.

Materials and methods

Strain isolation and identification

Strain 1605-214T was isolated from the blood culture of a cholangitis patient at Gyeongsang National University Hospital in Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea (35°10′ 35.5′′ N, 128°05′ 44.2′′ E). The strain was grown on a blood agar plate (BAP) (KisanBio, Korea) at 30 °C for 48 h and stored at − 70 °C in 10% glycerol. Initial attempts of identification were made using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with MALDI Biotyper software (Bruker Daltonik, Germany). The experiment was performed using C. luojiensis DSM 24270T, C. suwonensis DSM 25950T, and C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T as reference strains for comparative analysis of species characteristics. The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity was calculated by comparing its sequence with those on the EzTaxon server (http://www.eztaxon.org/) (Chun et al. 2007). 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed using universal primers 27F (3′ –AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG- 5′) and 1492R (5′ –TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) (Lane 1991).

Phenotypic, morphological, and biochemical characterization

Gram staining was performed using Gram Stain Kits (BD), and a catalase test was performed by adding 3% hydrogen peroxide solution to bacteria smeared on slides. The growth conditions for strain 1605-214T were determined at different pH values (4–10, at pH intervals of 0.5 unit) on BAP. For analysis of its biochemical and enzymatic characteristics, VITEK 2 GP (bioMérieux, France) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To analyze its isoprenoid quinones, the cell biomass of strain 1605-214T was obtained from cultures grown on BAP for 2 days at 30 °C. Quinones were extracted using the chloroform/methanol method [(C:M, 2:1, v/v)]. The extracted quinones were vacuum-evaporated and re-extracted using n-hexane-water (1:1, v/v). The purified quinones were analyzed using a reverse-phase HPLC system (Younglin, Korea), as described by Hiraishi et al. (1992). The polar lipid composition of strain 1605-214T was determined as described previously (Minnikin et al. 1980). The polar lipid composition was analyzed by two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (2D-TLC) on TLC Kiesel gel 60F254 (Merck, Germany) plates (10 × 10 cm). The cellular fatty acid composition of the isolated strain was analyzed according to Miller's method (Miller 1982). Agilent Technologies 6890 Gas Chromatography was performed to analyze the prepared samples, and an A30 m × 0.320 mm × 0.25 μm crosslinked methyl siloxane column (HP-1) was used as a separation column. The profile was analyzed using Sherlock MIS Software. Peak identification, retention time, peak area, and area ratio were determined by comparison with the standard calibration solution. The diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall was analyzed using a previously described method (Hasegawa et al. 1983). DNA–DNA hybridization was performed using the fluorometric microwell method (Ezaki et al. 1989).

Genomic DNA preparation and genome sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted by digestion of the bacteria with proteinase K in 10% SDS, followed by purification using the phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation methods. The primary sequencing library was prepared according to the protocol of the SMRTbell Template Prep Kit 1.0 (Pacific Biosciences, USA). The secondary sequencing library was prepared according to the protocol of the Ion Xpress Plus Fragment Library kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The genome was sequenced using PacBio RS II (Pacific Biosciences, USA) and Ion S5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) sequencing platforms.

Genome assembly

SPAdes Genome Assembler (v3.1) was adopted for de novo assembly sequence reads generated by NGS platforms PacBio RS II and Ion S5, and produced contigs and scaffold sequences. SSPACE program was used for scaffolding contigs and scaffold sequences, and the remaining sequencing errors including gaps and low-quality region were corrected using Proovread (v2.14.0).

Genome annotation

The genome of strain 1605-214T was initially annotated using the PROKKA (Seemann 2014) software package. The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (Tatusova et al. 2016) software package was used to generate the final annotation. The predicted protein sequences were classified into functional groups in Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) using eggNOG 5.0 (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019). The resistance genes and virulence factors were identified using AMRFinderPlus (Feldgarden et al. 2019) and VFdb (Liu et al. 2018), respectively.

16S rRNA phylogenetic tree

An initial genomic distance calculation was conducted by searching for the genetically closest strains in EzTaxon Server (Chun et al. 2007) and Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (Meier-Kolthoff and Göker 2019). The 16S rRNA sequences of 37 type strains belonging to the Cohnella genus were downloaded from the list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) (Parte 2018). The multiple sequence alignment was processed using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013). Phylogenetic trees were constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method by MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016) and the maximum-likelihood (ML) method by RAxML (Stamatakis 2014). Figtree software was used to visualize the trees (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree).

Genomic sequence similarity comparison

Genomic sequence similarity comparison was conducted using the available genomes of the five closest Cohnella species. OrthoANI (Lee et al. 2016) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) (Meier-Kolthoff et al. 2013) were used to compare genome similarities. To calculate the average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences (AGIOS) (Ramasamy et al. 2014) between genomes, the sets of orthologous proteins were first obtained using BLASTP, with the reciprocal-best-BLAST-hits (RBH) approach (minimal coverage of 50%, amino acid identity of 30%). The mean percentages of nucleotide sequence identity between the orthologous genes were then calculated.

Strain and sequence deposition

Strain 1605-214T has been deposited in two microbial culture collections: the National Culture Collection for Pathogens in South Korea (NCCP), under accession number NCCP 16833, and the German collection of microorganisms (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH in Germany, DSMZ), under the accession number DSM 112742. The complete genomic sequences of strain 1605-214T have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number CP041969.

Results and discussion

Phylogenetic affiliation

Three attempts to identify strain 1605-214T by MALDI-TOF MS failed. Phylogenetic analysis, based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (Table S2) revealed that strain 1605-214T belonged to the genus Cohnella and was closely related to Cohnella luojiensis DSM 24270T (97.9%) (Fig. 1, Figure S1).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of strain 1605-214T and closely related species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Tree was constructed using neighbor-joining methods. Numbers at branch nodes are percentages of 1000 bootstrap replications. Only values ≥ 60% are shown. Bar under the trees indicates the nucleotide substitution rate (0.005 = 1/10E-3)

Phylogenetic tree of strain 1605-214T and closely related species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Tree was constructed using neighbor-joining methods. Numbers at branch nodes are percentages of 1000 bootstrap replications. Only values ≥ 60% are shown. Bar under the trees indicates the nucleotide substitution rate (0.005 = 1/10E-3)

Phenotype

The optimal conditions of strain 1605-214T for growth were a temperature of 30 °C and a pH of 7 (Table 1). Based on VITEK 2 GP results, all four Cohnella spp. strains were positive for beta-galactosidase, beta galactopyranosidase, and alpha-galactosidase. In addition, strain 1605-214T was positive for alpha-glucosidase and negative for D-trehalose, whereas Cohnella luojiensis, which is considered a genetically close species, was negative and positive, respectively, for the above-mentioned enzymes. The major lipid classes of strain 1605-214T were identified as diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and aminophospholipid-1 (APL1). The major quinone present in the strain was identified as MK-7. The cell wall peptidoglycan of strain 1605-214T contained meso-diaminopimelic acid. The G + C content of strain 1605-214T was 50.6 mol%, and the major fatty acids were anteiso-C15:0 (36.1%), iso-C16:0 (16.5%), and C16:0 (15.1%) (Table 2). The relatedness of DNA between strain 1605-214T and C. luojiensis DSM 24270T was 23.0% ± 1.9. Based on phenotypic and genotypic distinctness and DNA–DNA hybridization results, strain 1605-214T was confirmed to be a novel pathogenic species similar to C. luojiensis.
Table 1

Comparison of characteristics of strain 1605-214T and related type strains of Cohnella species

Characteristic1234
Gram stain++++
Catalase++++
Motility
Temperature range (°C)15–4215–3715–3710–37
Optimal pH for growth6–86–86–8.55.5–8.5
Polar lipidsDPG, PE, APL1DPG, PG, PE, PL1DPG, PG, PE, APL4, APL5DPG, PG, PE, APL2, APL3
Diaminopimelic (DAP) acidmeso-DAPmeso-DAPmeso-DAPmeso-DAP
QuinonesMK-7MK-7MK-7MK-7
G + C content (mol%)50.648.354.451.4
Beta-galactosidase++++
Alpha-glucosidase+
Beta galactopyranosidase++++
Alpha-galactosidase++++
D-trehalose+

All data are from the present study. +, positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive

Negative for all 4 strains: D-amygdalin, Phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C, D-xylose, Arginine dihydrolase 1, Ala-Phe-Pro arylamidase, Cyclodextrin, L-Aspartate arylamidase, Alpha-mannosidase, Phosphatase, Leucine arylamidase, L-Proline arylamidase, Beta glucuronidase, L-pyrrolidonyl-arylamidase, Beta glucuronidase, Alanine arylamidase, Tyrosine arylamidase, D-sorbitol, Polymyxin B resistance, D-galactose, D-ribose, L-Lactate alkalinization, Lactose, N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine, D-maltose, Bacitracin resistance, Novobiocin resistance, Growth In 6.5% NaCl, D-mannitol, D-mannose, Methyl-B-D-glucopyranoside, Pullulan, D-raffinose, O/129 resistance (Comp.Vibrio.), Salicin, Saccharose/Sucrose, Arginine dihydrolase 2, Optochin resistance

1—C. cholangitidis 1605-214T; 2—C. luojiensis DSM 24270T; 3—C. suwonensis DSM 25950T; 4—C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T

Table 2

Cellular fatty acid content (%) of strain 1605-214T and C. luojiensis DSM 24270T, C. suwonensis DSM 25950T, and C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T

Fatty acid1234
10:000.1
12:0 iso0.3
12:000.31.60.60.6
13:0 iso0.2
13:0 anteiso0.91.51.5
14:0 iso2.52.14.22.1
14:001.31.01.21.5
15:0 iso4.89.062.2
15:0 anteiso36.151.251.945.1
16:1 w7c alcohol0.52.1
16:0015.14.97.714.0
16:0 iso16.511.020.523.6
16:1 w11c0.31.9
16:1 w7c/16:1 w6c0.2
17:1 iso w10c1.4
17:0 iso4.24.31.90.9
17:0 anteiso5.38.24.56.7
17:000.9
18:0 iso0.2-
18:000.8
18:2 w6,9c/18:0 ante0.6-
18:1 w9c4.90.9
18:1 w7c0.3
18:1 w6c0.5
18:004.3
16:1 w7c/16:1 w6c0.2
17:1 iso I/anteiso B1.3
18:2 w6,9c/18:0 ante0.5
18:1 w7c or 18:1 w6c0.8

All data are from the present study. – Not detected

1—C. cholangitidis 1605-214T; 2—C. luojiensis DSM 24270T; 3—C. suwonensis DSM 25950T; 4—C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T

*Summed features represent groups of two fatty acids that could not be separated by GLC using the MIDI system

Comparison of characteristics of strain 1605-214T and related type strains of Cohnella species All data are from the present study. +, positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive Negative for all 4 strains: D-amygdalin, Phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C, D-xylose, Arginine dihydrolase 1, Ala-Phe-Pro arylamidase, Cyclodextrin, L-Aspartate arylamidase, Alpha-mannosidase, Phosphatase, Leucine arylamidase, L-Proline arylamidase, Beta glucuronidase, L-pyrrolidonyl-arylamidase, Beta glucuronidase, Alanine arylamidase, Tyrosine arylamidase, D-sorbitol, Polymyxin B resistance, D-galactose, D-ribose, L-Lactate alkalinization, Lactose, N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine, D-maltose, Bacitracin resistance, Novobiocin resistance, Growth In 6.5% NaCl, D-mannitol, D-mannose, Methyl-B-D-glucopyranoside, Pullulan, D-raffinose, O/129 resistance (Comp.Vibrio.), Salicin, Saccharose/Sucrose, Arginine dihydrolase 2, Optochin resistance 1—C. cholangitidis 1605-214T; 2—C. luojiensis DSM 24270T; 3—C. suwonensis DSM 25950T; 4—C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T Cellular fatty acid content (%) of strain 1605-214T and C. luojiensis DSM 24270T, C. suwonensis DSM 25950T, and C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T All data are from the present study. – Not detected 1—C. cholangitidis 1605-214T; 2—C. luojiensis DSM 24270T; 3—C. suwonensis DSM 25950T; 4—C. yongneupensis DSM 18998T *Summed features represent groups of two fatty acids that could not be separated by GLC using the MIDI system

Genome properties

The complete genome of strain 1605-214T is 6,408,853 bp in length with a GC content of 51.2%. Out of the 5867 predicted genes, 5481 genes code for proteins and 95 code for RNA (8 genes are 5S rRNA genes; 8 genes are 16S rRNA; 8 genes are 23S rRNA genes; 67 genes are tRNA genes; 4 genes are ncRNAs genes) (Table S3). From the analysis of Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs), a total of 5,187 genes (94.6%) were assigned putative functions (Table S4). The strain 1605-214T contained 896 genes (16.3%) for information storage and processing, 1224 genes (22.3%) for cellular processes and signaling, and 2108 genes (38.5%) for metabolism. An in silico search for the resistome of this strain revealed that the clbC gene (90.4% identity) (Hansen et al. 2012) confers resistance to PhLOPSa (phenicol, lincosamide, oxazolidinone, pleuromutilin, and streptogramin A) antibiotics and was identified by NCBI AMRFinder program (Feldgarden et al. 2019). An in silico search for virulence factors revealed eight proteins with high identity percentages conferring potential pathogenicity. These proteins were LPS biosynthesis protein PseA-like (79.2% identity), chaperonin GroEL (75.3%), translation elongation factor Tu (73.6%), UTP–glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase gtaB (71.8%), imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit HisF (71.3%), ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit clpP (71.3%), enolase eno (70.3%), and glucose-1-phosphate thymidyl transferase rmlA (70.2%).

Comparison with genomes of other Cohnella species

At the time of manuscript preparation, the 16S rRNA sequences of the type strains were analyzed as mentioned above; however, a comparison at the whole-genome level was not possible. Therefore, the Cohnella cholangitidis 1605-214T was further compared to four type strains, including C. luojiensis (Table 3). The four strains were selected based on the results of the dDDH analysis from TYGS. Additionally, average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis was also performed for the strains. The dDDH and ANI results for the assessed strains were, respectively, as follows: C. luojiensis (21.1%, 77.2%), C. lupini (20.6%, 76.1%), C. endophytica (20.3%, 75.4%), and C. abietis (19.5%, 73.7%) (Table 3). These dDDH (< 70%) and ANI (< 95%) values indicated that strain 1605-214T represents a species distinct from other Cohnella strains. The distribution of genes into COG categories was similar in the gnomes of five strains as shown in Fig. 2. Strain 1605-214T shared 3853, 4127, 4163, and 4084 orthologous genes with C. lupijiensis, C. lupini, C. abietis, C. endophytica, respectively (Table 4, upper diagonal numbers). The average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequence (AGIOS) ranged from 48.5% with C. abietis to 49.0% with C. luojiensis (Table 4, lower diagonal numbers).
Table 3

G + C content, digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH), average nucleotide identity (ANI), and 16S rRNA sequence identity of the genome sequences of C. cholangitidis 1605–214T and the four closest strains

SpeciesStrainGenBank accessionGenome assembly level (contig no.)Sequence length (Mbp)G + C content (%)dDDH (%)ANI (%)16S rRNA (%)
C. cholangitidis1605-214TCP041969Complete (1)6.451.2
C. luojiensisHY-22TNZ_SOMN00000000Draft (115)5.0449.921.177.297.9
C. abietisHS-21TAP019400Complete (1)7.0544.819.573.697.6
C. endophyticaM2MS4P-1TNZ_RBZM00000000Draft (32)6.2651.520.375.497.4
C. lupiniRLAHU4BTNZ_QRDY00000000Draft (65)6.3450.720.676.197.2
Fig. 2

Functional COG distribution of the predicted genes in genomes. Gene components between the four closest species of genomes showed a similar composition of functional COG distribution

Table 4

The number of shared orthologous genes between the genomes of four closely related strains (upper diagonal numbers), the average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences corresponding to orthologous proteins shared between the genomes (lower diagonal numbers), and number of proteins per genome (principal diagonal elements; bold numbers)

1605-214THY-22THS-21TM2MS4P-1TRLAHU4BT
C. cholangitidis 1605-214T54813853416340844127
C. luojiensis HY-22T48.94737397939503851
C. abietis HS-21T48.564.7620343804341
C. endophytica M2MS4P-1T48.966.864.253354199
C. lupini RLAHU4BT49.071.264.467.75608
G + C content, digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH), average nucleotide identity (ANI), and 16S rRNA sequence identity of the genome sequences of C. cholangitidis 1605–214T and the four closest strains Functional COG distribution of the predicted genes in genomes. Gene components between the four closest species of genomes showed a similar composition of functional COG distribution The number of shared orthologous genes between the genomes of four closely related strains (upper diagonal numbers), the average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences corresponding to orthologous proteins shared between the genomes (lower diagonal numbers), and number of proteins per genome (principal diagonal elements; bold numbers)

Conclusion

The phenotypic, morphological, and biochemical characterizations, genome perspectives, and comparative genome analyses suggested that strain 1605-214T represents a novel species of the genus Cohnella for which the name C. cholangitidis is proposed.

Description of Cohnella cholangitidis sp. nov.

Cohnella cholangitidis (chol.an.gi’ti.dis. N.L. gen. n. cholangitidis of cholangitis, derived from the disease of the patient from which this strain was isolated). Gram-positive, rod-shaped, catalase-positive, oxidase-positive, and facultative anaerobic. Colonies are grayish-white in color and 0.5 mm in size on BAP. The optimal growth conditions are 30 °C and pH 7, although growth is also observed at 15–42 °C and pH 6–8. Positive for alpha-galactosidase, beta-galactosidase, alpha-glucosidase, and beta-galactopyranosidase. The G + C content is 50.6 mol% and the major fatty acids are anteiso-C15:0 (36.1%), iso-C16:0 (16.5%), and C16:0 (15.1%). The major lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and aminophospholipid-1 (APL1). The major quinone is MK-7. The cell wall contains meso-diaminopimelic acid. Strain 1605-214T (= NCCP 16833T, = DSM 112742T) was isolated from a clinical specimen at the Gyeongsang National University Hospital in Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary Fig. S1 Phylogenetic tree of strain 1605-214T based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Tree was constructed using maximum-likelihood method. Numbers at branch nodes are percentages of 1000 bootstrap replications. Only values ≥ 60% are shown. Bar under the trees indicates the nucleotide substitution rate (0.05 = 1/10E-2) (TIFF 10668 KB) Supplementary file2 (XLSX 20 KB) Supplementary file3 (XLSX 18 KB) Supplementary file4 (DOCX 37 KB)
  15 in total

1.  Cohnella cellulosilytica sp. nov., isolated from buffalo faeces.

Authors:  Saowapar Khianngam; Somboon Tanasupawat; Ancharida Akaracharanya; Kwang Kyu Kim; Keun Chul Lee; Jung-Sook Lee
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences.

Authors:  Jongsik Chun; Jae-Hak Lee; Yoonyoung Jung; Myungjin Kim; Seil Kim; Byung Kwon Kim; Young-Woon Lim
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Validating the AMRFinder Tool and Resistance Gene Database by Using Antimicrobial Resistance Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in a Collection of Isolates.

Authors:  Michael Feldgarden; Vyacheslav Brover; Daniel H Haft; Arjun B Prasad; Douglas J Slotta; Igor Tolstoy; Gregory H Tyson; Shaohua Zhao; Chih-Hao Hsu; Patrick F McDermott; Daniel A Tadesse; Cesar Morales; Mustafa Simmons; Glenn Tillman; Jamie Wasilenko; Jason P Folster; William Klimke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cohnella soli sp. nov. and Cohnella suwonensis sp. nov. Isolated from soil samples in Korea.

Authors:  Soo-Jin Kim; Hang-Yeon Weon; Yi-Seul Kim; Soon-Wo Kwon
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.422

5.  The order Bacillales hosts functional homologs of the worrisome cfr antibiotic resistance gene.

Authors:  Lykke H Hansen; Mercè H Planellas; Katherine S Long; Birte Vester
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cohnella thermotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., and classification of 'Paenibacillus hongkongensis' as Cohnella hongkongensis sp. nov.

Authors:  Peter Kämpfer; Ramon Rosselló-Mora; Enevold Falsen; Hans-Jürgen Busse; Brian J Tindall
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Cohnella luojiensis sp. nov., isolated from soil of a Euphrates poplar forest.

Authors:  Feng Cai; Yang Wang; Huan Qi; Jun Dai; Bo Yu; Hongli An; Erkin Rahman; Chengxiang Fang
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Cohnella yongneupensis sp. nov. and Cohnella ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from two different soils.

Authors:  Soo-Jin Kim; Hang-Yeon Weon; Yi-Seul Kim; Rangasamy Anandham; Young-Ah Jeon; Seung-Beom Hong; Soon-Wo Kwon
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Tick-bite fever in pregnancy. A case report.

Authors:  M J England; E W Sonnendecker; K A Margolius; J Kiepiel; J Baker; P Koll
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1987-08-01

10.  TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy.

Authors:  Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Markus Göker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.