| Literature DB >> 34562114 |
Ed Maunder1, Daniel J Plews2, Gareth A Wallis3, Matthew J Brick4, Warren B Leigh4, Wee-Leong Chang5, Tom Stewart2,6, Casey M Watkins2, Andrew E Kilding2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Whole-body fat oxidation during exercise can be measured non-invasively during athlete profiling. Gaps in understanding exist in the relationships between fat oxidation during incremental fasted exercise and skeletal muscle parameters, endurance performance, and fat oxidation during prolonged fed-state exercise.Entities:
Keywords: CD36; Cycling; Fat metabolism; Muscle; Performance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34562114 PMCID: PMC8475903 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04820-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078
Selected responses measured at the observed peak fat oxidation rate
| Variable | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| 1.98 ± 0.64 | |
| 46 ± 10 | |
| 1.63 ± 0.54 | |
| PetCO2 (mmHg) | 36.4 ± 2.2 |
| 24.9 ± 2.1 | |
| Blood [La−] (mmol.L−1) | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| Cadence (revs.min−1) | 82 ± 4 |
Fig. 1Comparison of peak fat oxidation during fasted incremental cycling estimated using observed and modelled values, and average fat oxidation during 2-h of fed-state cycling at 80% of the first ventilatory threshold. Bars indicate group mean and lines indicate individual responses. ‘§’ indicates P < 0.001 vs. average fat oxidation during 2-h of fed-state cycling at 80% of the first ventilatory threshold
Bivariate associations between outcome measures in this study
| Prolonged FO | CD36 abundance | CS activity | TT (W) | TT (W.kg−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Incremental PFO (observed) (g.min−1) | (0.57, 0.94) | (0.31, 1.10) | (0.58, 0.95) | (0.40, 0.91) | (0.16, 0.86) |
Incremental PFO (modelled) (g.min−1) | (0.59, 0.94) | (0.22, 1.11) | (0.56, 0.94) | (0.38, 0.91) | (0.14, 0.86) |
Incremental PFO (observed) (g.min−1.kg−1 BM) | (0.59, 0.94) | (0.20, 1.11) | (0.69, 0.96) | (0.27, 0.89) | (0.32, 0.90) |
| Prolonged FO | (− 0.47, 1.04) | (0.73, 0.96) | (0.12, 0.84) | (0.08, 0.82) | |
| CD36 abundance | (− 0.46, 0.86) | (− 0.02, 1.14) | (− 0.37, 1.00) | ||
| CS activity | (0.03, 0.82) | (0.15, 0.86) | |||
| TT (W) | (0.63, 0.95) |
BM body mass, CS vastus lateralis citrate synthase activity expressed per unit of muscle protein, CD36 vastus lateralis cluster of differentiation 36 abundance expressed per unit of muscle protein, FO whole-body fat oxidation rate during 2 h of fed-state constant-load cycling at the first ventilatory threshold with carbohydrate feeding expressed in g.min−1, PFO peak whole-body fat oxidation rate during incremental cycling expressed in g.min−1, TT average power during a 30-min maximal-effort time-trial preceded by 2 h of constant-load cycling at the first ventilatory threshold
Fig. 2Relationships between peak fat oxidation during fasted, incremental cycling using observed values and a average fat oxidation during 2-h of fed-state cycling at 80% of the first ventilatory threshold (VT1), b vastus lateralis CD36 abundance, c vastus lateralis CS activity, d 30-min time-trial performance expressed in Watts, and e 30-min time-trial performance expressed in Watts per kilogram of body mass
Summary of regression models of pre-loaded 30-min time-trial performance (W)
| Descriptor | AIC | Adjusted | Input variable | Unstandardised coefficient | Standardised coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 86.52 | 0.903 | < 0.001 | V̇O2peak | 3.109 | 0.460 |
| Power at 4 mmol.L−1 | 0.395 | 0.419 | ||||
| GE | 3.729 | 0.102 | ||||
| PFO | 59.057 | 0.236 | ||||
| Traditional | 90.18 | 0.877 | < 0.001 | 3.481 | 0.497 | |
| Power at 4 mmol.L−1 | 0.519 | 0.558 | ||||
| GE | 3.578 | 0.096 | ||||
Independent variables used in the model were O2 peak (mL.kg−1.min−1), power at 4 mmol.L−1 blood lactate concentration (W), gross efficiency at 165 W (GE, %), and observed peak fat oxidation rate (PFO, g.min−1). The traditional model did not use observed PFO. The bold model has the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC), and was, therefore, selected as the best and most parsimonious model fit