Literature DB >> 34561266

Cognitive and Executive Function in Congenital Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis.

Maria Feldmann1,2, Célina Bataillard1,2, Melanie Ehrler1,2, Cinzia Ullrich1,2, Walter Knirsch2,3, Martina A Gosteli-Peter4, Ulrike Held5, Beatrice Latal6,2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cognitive function and executive function (EF) impairments contribute to the long-term burden of congenital heart disease (CHD). However, the degree and profile of impairments are insufficiently described.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence on cognitive function and EF outcomes in school-aged children operated for CHD and identify the risk factors for an unfavorable outcome. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO. STUDY SELECTION: Original peer-reviewed studies reporting cognitive or EF outcome in 5- to 17-year old children with CHD after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. DATA EXTRACTION: Results of IQ and EF assessments were extracted, and estimates were transformed to means and SE. Standardized mean differences were calculated for comparison with healthy controls.
RESULTS: Among 74 studies (3645 children with CHD) reporting total IQ, the summary estimate was 96.03 (95% confidence interval: 94.91 to 97.14). Hypoplastic left heart syndrome and univentricular CHD cohorts performed significantly worse than atrial and ventricular septum defect cohorts (P = .0003; P = .027). An older age at assessment was associated with lower IQ scores in cohorts with transposition of the great arteries (P = .014). Among 13 studies (774 children with CHD) reporting EF compared with controls, the standardized mean difference was -0.56 (95% confidence interval: -0.65 to -0.46) with no predilection for a specific EF domain or age effect. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity between studies was large.
CONCLUSIONS: Intellectual impairments in CHD are frequent, with severity and trajectory depending on the CHD subtype. EF performance is poorer in children with CHD without a specific EF profile. The heterogeneity in studied populations and applied assessments is large. A uniform testing guideline is urgently needed.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34561266     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  2 in total

1.  Effect of Nitric Oxide via Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Ventilator-Free Days in Young Children Undergoing Congenital Heart Disease Surgery: The NITRIC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Luregn J Schlapbach; Kristen S Gibbons; Stephen B Horton; Kerry Johnson; Debbie A Long; David H F Buckley; Simon Erickson; Marino Festa; Yves d'Udekem; Nelson Alphonso; David S Winlaw; Carmel Delzoppo; Kim van Loon; Mark Jones; Paul J Young; Warwick Butt; Andreas Schibler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 157.335

2.  Intelligence outcome of pediatric intensive care unit survivors: a systematic meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Eleonore S V de Sonnaville; Marsh Kӧnigs; Ouke van Leijden; Hennie Knoester; Job B M van Woensel; Jaap Oosterlaan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 11.150

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.