Allison Barz Leahy1, Haley Newman2, Yimei Li3, Hongyan Liu4, Regina Myers5, Amanda DiNofia5, Joseph G Dolan5, Colleen Callahan2, Diane Baniewicz2, Kaitlin Devine5, Lisa Wray5, Richard Aplenc5, Carl H June6, Stephan A Grupp5, Susan R Rheingold5, Shannon L Maude7. 1. Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 7. Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: maude@chop.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CNS relapse of acute lymphocytic leukaemia is difficult to treat. Durable remissions of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia have been observed following treatment with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells; however, most trials have excluded patients with active CNS disease. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with a history of CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis, we included 195 patients (aged 1-29 years; 110 [56%] male and 85 [44%] female) with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma from five clinical trials (Pedi CART19, 13BT022, ENSIGN, ELIANA, and 16CT022) done at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA, USA), in which participants received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy between April 17, 2012, and April 16, 2019. The trials required control of CNS disease at enrolment and infusion and excluded treatment in the setting of acute neurological toxic effects (>grade 1 in severity) or parenchymal lesions deemed to increase the risk of neurotoxicity. 154 patients from Pedi CART19, ELIANA, ENSIGN, and 16CT022 received tisagenlecleucel and 41 patients from the 13BT022 trial received the humanised CD19-directed CAR, huCART19. We categorised patients into two strata on the basis of CNS status at relapse or within the 12 months preceding CAR T-cell infusion-either CNS-positive or CNS-negative disease. Patients with CNS-positive disease were further divided on the basis of morphological bone marrow involvement-either combined bone marrow and CNS involvement, or isolated CNS involvement. Endpoints were the proportion of patients with complete response at 28 days after infusion, Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival and overall survival, and the incidence of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. FINDINGS: Of all 195 patients, 66 (34%) were categorised as having CNS-positive disease and 129 (66%) as having CNS-negative disease, and 43 (22%) were categorised as having isolated CNS involvement. The median length of follow-up was 39 months (IQR 25-49) in the CNS-positive stratum and 36 months (18-49) in the CNS-negative stratum. The proportion of patients in the CNS-positive stratum with a complete response at 28 days after infusion was similar to that in the CNS-negative stratum (64 [97%] of 66 vs 121 [94%] of 129; p=0·74), with no significant difference in relapse-free survival (60% [95% CI 49-74] vs 60% [51-71]; p=0·50) or overall survival (83% [75-93] vs 71% [64-79]; p=0·39) at 2 years between the two groups. Overall survival at 2 years was significantly higher in patients with isolated CNS involvement compared with those with bone marrow involvement (91% [82-100] vs 71% [64-78]; p=0·046). The incidence and severity of neurotoxicity (any grade, 53 [41%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 1, 24 [19%] vs 20 [30%]; grade 2, 14 [11%] vs 10 [15%]; grade 3, 12 [9%] vs 6 [9%], and grade 4, 3 [2%] vs 2 [3%]; p=0·20) and cytokine release syndrome (any grade, 110 [85%] vs 53 [80%]; grade 1, 12 [9%] vs 2 [3%]; grade 2, 61 [47%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 3, 18 [14%] vs 7 [11%] and grade 4, 19 [15%] vs 6 [9%]; p=0·26) did not differ between the CNS-negative and the CNS-positive disease strata. INTERPRETATION: Tisagenlecleucel and huCART19 are active at clearing CNS disease and maintaining durable remissions in children and young adults with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma, without increasing the risk of severe neurotoxicity; although care should be taken in the timing of therapy and disease control to mitigate this risk. These preliminary findings support the use of these CAR T-cell therapies for patients with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. FUNDING: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Frontier Program.
BACKGROUND: CNS relapse of acute lymphocytic leukaemia is difficult to treat. Durable remissions of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia have been observed following treatment with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells; however, most trials have excluded patients with active CNS disease. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with a history of CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis, we included 195 patients (aged 1-29 years; 110 [56%] male and 85 [44%] female) with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma from five clinical trials (Pedi CART19, 13BT022, ENSIGN, ELIANA, and 16CT022) done at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA, USA), in which participants received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy between April 17, 2012, and April 16, 2019. The trials required control of CNS disease at enrolment and infusion and excluded treatment in the setting of acute neurological toxic effects (>grade 1 in severity) or parenchymal lesions deemed to increase the risk of neurotoxicity. 154 patients from Pedi CART19, ELIANA, ENSIGN, and 16CT022 received tisagenlecleucel and 41 patients from the 13BT022 trial received the humanised CD19-directed CAR, huCART19. We categorised patients into two strata on the basis of CNS status at relapse or within the 12 months preceding CAR T-cell infusion-either CNS-positive or CNS-negative disease. Patients with CNS-positive disease were further divided on the basis of morphological bone marrow involvement-either combined bone marrow and CNS involvement, or isolated CNS involvement. Endpoints were the proportion of patients with complete response at 28 days after infusion, Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival and overall survival, and the incidence of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. FINDINGS: Of all 195 patients, 66 (34%) were categorised as having CNS-positive disease and 129 (66%) as having CNS-negative disease, and 43 (22%) were categorised as having isolated CNS involvement. The median length of follow-up was 39 months (IQR 25-49) in the CNS-positive stratum and 36 months (18-49) in the CNS-negative stratum. The proportion of patients in the CNS-positive stratum with a complete response at 28 days after infusion was similar to that in the CNS-negative stratum (64 [97%] of 66 vs 121 [94%] of 129; p=0·74), with no significant difference in relapse-free survival (60% [95% CI 49-74] vs 60% [51-71]; p=0·50) or overall survival (83% [75-93] vs 71% [64-79]; p=0·39) at 2 years between the two groups. Overall survival at 2 years was significantly higher in patients with isolated CNS involvement compared with those with bone marrow involvement (91% [82-100] vs 71% [64-78]; p=0·046). The incidence and severity of neurotoxicity (any grade, 53 [41%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 1, 24 [19%] vs 20 [30%]; grade 2, 14 [11%] vs 10 [15%]; grade 3, 12 [9%] vs 6 [9%], and grade 4, 3 [2%] vs 2 [3%]; p=0·20) and cytokine release syndrome (any grade, 110 [85%] vs 53 [80%]; grade 1, 12 [9%] vs 2 [3%]; grade 2, 61 [47%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 3, 18 [14%] vs 7 [11%] and grade 4, 19 [15%] vs 6 [9%]; p=0·26) did not differ between the CNS-negative and the CNS-positive disease strata. INTERPRETATION: Tisagenlecleucel and huCART19 are active at clearing CNS disease and maintaining durable remissions in children and young adults with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma, without increasing the risk of severe neurotoxicity; although care should be taken in the timing of therapy and disease control to mitigate this risk. These preliminary findings support the use of these CAR T-cell therapies for patients with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. FUNDING: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Frontier Program.
Authors: Cameron J Turtle; Laïla-Aïcha Hanafi; Carolina Berger; Theodore A Gooley; Sindhu Cherian; Michael Hudecek; Daniel Sommermeyer; Katherine Melville; Barbara Pender; Tanya M Budiarto; Emily Robinson; Natalia N Steevens; Colette Chaney; Lorinda Soma; Xueyan Chen; Cecilia Yeung; Brent Wood; Daniel Li; Jianhong Cao; Shelly Heimfeld; Michael C Jensen; Stanley R Riddell; David G Maloney Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Juliane Gust; Kevin A Hay; Laïla-Aïcha Hanafi; Daniel Li; David Myerson; Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar; Cecilia Yeung; W Conrad Liles; Mark Wurfel; Jose A Lopez; Junmei Chen; Dominic Chung; Susanna Harju-Baker; Tahsin Özpolat; Kathleen R Fink; Stanley R Riddell; David G Maloney; Cameron J Turtle Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Jacqueline S Gofshteyn; Pamela A Shaw; David T Teachey; Stephan A Grupp; Shannon Maude; Brenda Banwell; Fang Chen; Simon F Lacey; Jan J Melenhorst; MacKenzie J Edmonson; Jessica Panzer; David M Barrett; Jennifer L McGuire Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Amir Hamdi; Raya Mawad; Roland Bassett; Antonio di Stasi; Roberto Ferro; Aimaz Afrough; Ron Ram; Bouthaina Dabaja; Gabriela Rondon; Richard Champlin; Brenda M Sandmaier; Kristine Doney; Merav Bar; Partow Kebriaei Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Eric C Larsen; Meenakshi Devidas; Si Chen; Wanda L Salzer; Elizabeth A Raetz; Mignon L Loh; Leonard A Mattano; Catherine Cole; Alisa Eicher; Maureen Haugan; Mark Sorenson; Nyla A Heerema; Andrew A Carroll; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Michael J Borowitz; Brent L Wood; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi J Winick; Stephen P Hunger; William L Carroll Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert E Goldsby; Qi Liu; Paul C Nathan; Daniel C Bowers; Amanda Yeaton-Massey; Shannon H Raber; Daniel Hill; Gregory T Armstrong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie Zeltzer; Leslie L Robison; Roger J Packer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew J Frigault; Jorg Dietrich; Maria Martinez-Lage; Mark Leick; Bryan D Choi; Zachariah DeFilipp; Yi-Bin Chen; Jeremy Abramson; Jennifer Crombie; Philippe Armand; Lakshmi Nayak; Chris Panzini; Lauren S Riley; Kathleen Gallagher; Marcela V Maus Journal: Blood Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 25.476
Authors: Regina M Myers; Yimei Li; Allison Barz Leahy; David M Barrett; David T Teachey; Colleen Callahan; Christina C Fasano; Susan R Rheingold; Amanda DiNofia; Lisa Wray; Richard Aplenc; Diane Baniewicz; Hongyan Liu; Pamela A Shaw; Edward Pequignot; Kelly D Getz; Jennifer L Brogdon; Andrew D Fesnak; Donald L Siegel; Megan M Davis; Chelsie Bartoszek; Simon F Lacey; Elizabeth O Hexner; Anne Chew; Gerald B Wertheim; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June; Stephan A Grupp; Shannon L Maude Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yimei Li; Wei-Ting Hwang; Shannon L Maude; David T Teachey; Noelle V Frey; Regina M Myers; Allison Barz Leahy; Hongyan Liu; David L Porter; Stephan A Grupp; Pamela A Shaw Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Haneen Shalabi; Staci Martin; Bonnie Yates; Pamela L Wolters; Claire Kaplan; Hannah Smith; Christopher R Sesi; Jennifer Jess; Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula; Kari Struemph; Cindy P Delbrook; Omar I Khan; Crystal L Mackall; Daniel W Lee; Nirali N Shah Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: Vanessa A Fabrizio; Christine L Phillips; Adam Lane; Christina Baggott; Snehit Prabhu; Emily Egeler; Sharon Mavroukakis; Holly Pacenta; Jenna Rossoff; Heather E Stefanski; Julie-An Talano; Amy Moskop; Steven P Margossian; Michael R Verneris; Gary Douglas Myers; Nicole A Karras; Patrick A Brown; Muna Qayed; Michelle Hermiston; Prakash Satwani; Christa Krupski; Amy K Keating; Rachel Wilcox; Cara A Rabik; Vasant Chinnabhandar; Michael Kunicki; A Yasemin Goksenin; Kevin J Curran; Crystal L Mackall; Theodore W Laetsch; Liora M Schultz Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2022-01-25