| Literature DB >> 34559567 |
Danijela Popović1, Martyna Molak1,2, Mariusz Ziółkowski3, Alexei Vranich4, Maciej Sobczyk3,5, Delfor Ulloa Vidaurre6, Guido Agresti3, Magdalena Skrzypczak1, Krzysztof Ginalski1, Thiseas Christos Lamnidis7, Nathan Nakatsuka8,9, Swapan Mallick8,10,11, Mateusz Baca1.
Abstract
Tiwanaku civilization flourished in the Lake Titicaca basin between 500 and 1000 CE and at its apogee influenced wide areas across the southern Andes. Despite a considerable amount of archaeological data, little is known about the Tiwanaku population. We analyzed 17 low-coverage genomes from individuals dated between 300 and 1500 CE and demonstrated genetic continuity in the Lake Titicaca basin throughout this period, which indicates that the substantial cultural and political changes in the region were not accompanied by large-scale population movements. Conversely, the ritual center of Tiwanaku revealed high diversity, including individuals with primarily local genetic ancestry and those with foreign admixture or provenance from as far as the Amazon. Nonetheless, most human offerings associated with the Akapana platform exhibited pure Titicaca basin ancestry and dated to ca. 950 CE—the onset of Tiwanaku’s decline as a sociopolitical center. Our results strengthen the view of Tiwanaku as a complex and far-reaching polity.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34559567 PMCID: PMC8462900 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg7261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1.Provenience of the individuals and groups analyzed in this study.
(A) Geographic locations of the groups in South America and (B) map focusing on the Central Andes; present-day political borders provided for reference. (C) Extent of Tiwanaku influence, showing main sites and locations from where TIW, LUK, and ORU individuals were sampled for this study (red stars) [redrawn from (); map to scale around the lake, not to scale in outlying regions]. (D) Location of monuments at the site of Tiwanaku [contours redrawn from ()].
Radiocarbon dates and main genetic indices of the individuals analyzed in this study. n.a., not applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TW004 | TIW | Akapana | 870–990 | 0.32 | M | C1b | Q1b1a1a1 |
| TW008 | Akapana | 880–990 | 0.15 | M | B2 | Q1b1a1a1w | |
| TW056 | Monolito | 890–990 | 1.20 | F | C1d1 | n.a. | |
| TW059 | Pumapunku | 680–740 (21.3%), | 0.19 | M | B2 | Low cov | |
| TW060 | Akapana | 900–930 (10.9%), | 0.19 | F | D1 | n.a. | |
| TW061 | Akapana | 1020–1150 | 0.14 | F | B2b | n.a. | |
| TW063 | Putuni | 670–780 (93.5%), | 0.58 | F | C1c | n.a. | |
| TW097 | Akapana | 880–970 | 0.21 | M | C1c | Q1b1a | |
| TW013 | LUK | Lukurmata | 200–370 | 2.56 | F | C1b | n.a. |
| TW020 | Lukurmata | 1020–1150 | 0.17 | F | B2 | n.a. | |
| TW027 | Lukurmata | 980–1050 | 0.34 | M | B2 | Q1b1 | |
| TW028 | Lukurmata | 1430–1510 | 1.23 | M | B2 | Q1b1a1a1i | |
| TW033 | ORU | Totocachi | 1390–1440 | 0.14 | F | B2 | n.a. |
| CO001 | COR | Culcunche | 770–820 (5.1%), | 0.43 | F | B2 | n.a. |
| CO066 | Maucallacta | 1450–1510 | 0.4 | M | B2b | Q1b1a1a1i | |
| CO154 | Antaura | 1490–1630 | 0.9 | F | A2d1 | n.a. | |
| CO193 | Cotahuasi | 1280–1320 | 0.45 | F | B2 | n.a. |
*Dates (95.4% probability) calibrated in OxCal v4.3.2 () using SHcal13 calibration curve ().
Fig. 2.Genetic affinities of the ancient and present-day South American individuals.
(A) PCA plot of SNP-based genomic variation of 217 present-day South American individuals (empty markers) with ancient individuals projected (filled markers). Label for each marker is provided in (C). The covered part of this panel does not contain any data points. (B) Close-up of the most relevant section of the plot. (C) ADMIXTURE plot for K = 5. (D) MDS plot for the outgroup f3-statistic [1-f3(IND, Test, Mbuti)] matrix.
Fig. 3.Neighbor-joining tree based on inverted outgroup f3-statistics.
Distance: 1/f3(IND, Test, Mbuti). Individuals from the current study are shown in bold, TIW in red, LUK and ORU in blue, and COR in black. Previously published ancient individuals are marked with the colors used for their responding markers in Fig. 2C.
Fig. 4.Ancestry modeling for Tiwanaku site and Lukurmata individuals.
Ancestral source of the Tiwanaku (TIW) and Lukurmata (LUK) individuals, as estimated by qpWave and qpAdm using all possible South American populations as potential sources. Multiple columns for a single individual represent all of the potential single sources of ancestry that fit the data. For admixed individuals with more than one source of ancestry, we display significant results (P > 0.05) of the fitted two-source model from qpAdm (including SE). Provenience of each of the Tiwanaku ritual core remains is labeled with a silhouette of the corresponding monument. nd, not dated.