| Literature DB >> 34559127 |
Hai-Bing Liu1, Wei-Ming Xu2, Shou-Sen Wang1, Liang-Feng Wei1, Jing-Fang Hong1, Cheng Wang1, Liang Xian1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a common neurosurgical condition, has well-known treatment guidelines. However, the mechanisms underlying the varying severity of brain edema secondary to TBI are largely unknown, leading to controversial treatments.This study seeks to measure edema volumes around brain contusions in different regions, analyze factors related to differences in edema volume and provide a theoretical basis for brain edema treatment.Data from 113 brain contusion patients treated at the Department of Neurosurgery of Fuzhou General Hospital from January 2017 to November 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on computed tomography (CT) data, the patients were divided into the venous group (brain contusion in regions with large cortical veins, n = 47) and the nonvenous group (brain contusions in other regions, n = 66). Here, 3D Slicer software was used to calculate the brain contusion volume on the first CT obtained after injury and the brain contusion volume and its surrounding edema on the 5th day after injury. The brain contusion volume to surrounding edema volume ratio was calculated, and the number of patients who showed brain contusion progression requiring surgery was determined. Hematocrit (Hct), fibrinogen (Fg), and d-dimer levels within 6 hours and on the 5th day after admission were also compared.Patients in the venous group had a significantly increased percentage of area with edema around the brain contusion compared with patients in the nonvenous group (P < .05), and the 2 groups showed no significant difference in the number of patients with brain contusion progression or surgical treatment (P > .05) or Hct, Fg, or d-dimer (D-D) levels. For all patients, Hct, Fg, and D-D levels within 6 hours after admission were significantly different from those on the 5th day (P < .05 for all).Cortical venous obstruction may be the most important factor influencing edema around brain contusions. The Fg level decreased slightly, and the D-D level increased to its peak rapidly after mild-moderate TBI. This change was followed by a gradual increase in the former and a gradual decrease in the latter.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34559127 PMCID: PMC8462588 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 13D Slicer software reconstruction of the volume of a brain contusion and the surrounding edema in a patient in the venous group. A. Brain contusion in the left Labbé vein. B. Coloring of the brain contusion and surrounding edema. C. 3D reconstruction produced by 3D Slicer software. D. CTV showing the Labbé vein (black arrow) located in the brain contusion. CTV = computed tomography venography.
Figure 23D Slicer reconstruction of the volume of the left frontal lobe contusion and the surrounding edema in a patient in the nonvenous group. A. Left frontal lobe contusion with intracerebral hematoma. B. Reconstruction and coloring of the hematoma in dark red. C. Reconstruction and coloring of the surrounding edema in blue. D. 3D reconstruction of the hematoma and edema.
Clinical patient data from both groups.
| Clinical data | Venous group | Nonvenous group |
| |
| Sex (male/female, n) | 29/18 | 40/26 | 0.14 | .91 |
| Age (years) | 43.17 ± 12.97 | 43.02 ± 12.92 | 0.63 | .95 |
| GCS score within 6 hours after injury | 12.28 ± 1.67 | 12.62 ± 1.60 | −1.11 | .27 |
| Brain contusion volume on first CT after injury (mL) | 7.54 ± 3.29 | 8.8 ± 4.28 | −1.69 | .09 |
| Hct (40%–50%) | 37.6 ± 4.15 | 37.51 ± 3.52 | 0.12 | .91 |
| Fg (2–4 g/L) | 2.7 ± 0.79 | 2.69 ± 0.68 | 0.11 | .91 |
| D-D (<0.5 mg/L) | 4.83 ± 2.52 | 5.07 ± 2.4 | −0.51 | .72 |
Clinical patient data from both groups on the 5th day after injury.
| Clinical data | Venous group | Nonvenous group |
| |
| Patients with progression (n) | 12 (47) | 15 (66) | 0.12 | .73 |
| Patients who underwent surgery due to progression (n) | 7 (47) | 11 (66) | 0.06 | .80 |
| GCS score on the 5th day after injury | 12.38 ± 1.73 | 12.73 ± 1.55 | −1.11 | .27 |
| Brain contusion volume (mL) | 8.38 ± 3.65 | 9.21 ± 4.08 | −1.12 | .27 |
| Surrounding edema volume (mL) | 16.62 ± 6.55 | 14.09 ± 5.36 | 2.25 | .03 |
| Edema/contusion (%) | 73.64 ± 5.25 | 59.5 ± 10.91 | 3.69 | .002 |
| Hct | 37.67 ± 3.38 | 37.83 ± 3.04 | −0.27 | .79 |
| Fg | 4.28 ± 1.21 | 4.2 ± 1.09 | 0.35 | .73 |
| D-D | 3.79 ± 1.7 | 4.26 ± 1.47 | −1.58 | .87 |
Comparison of indexes in patients from both groups obtained within 6 hours and on the 5th day after injury.
| Clinical indexes (n = 95) | Within 6 hours | On the 5th day |
| |
| Hct | 37.67 ± 3.85 | 37.55 ± 3.28 | 0.23 | .27 |
| Fg | 2.66 ± 0.75 | 4.25 ± 1.21 | −10.93 | .00 |
| D-D | 4.29 ± 2.06 | 3.83 ± 1.48 | 1.8 | .01 |