| Literature DB >> 34557651 |
Ibtihel Dhaya1,2,3, Marion Griton1,2,4, Jan Pieter Konsman1,2.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rodents combined with histology allows to determine what mechanisms underlie functional and structural brain changes during sepsis-associated encephalopathy. However, the effects of MRI performed in isoflurane-anesthetized rodents on modifications of the blood-brain barrier and the production of vasoactive prostaglandins and glia cells, which have been proposed to mediate sepsis-associated brain dysfunction, are unknown.Entities:
Keywords: anesthesia; astrocyte; blood‐brain barrier; magnetic resonance imaging; microglia; sepsis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34557651 PMCID: PMC8446714 DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animal Model Exp Med ISSN: 2576-2095
FIGURE 2Photomicrographs illustrating the distribution of COX‐2‐immunoreactivity in the ventromedial preoptic area (A, B), caudate putamen (C, D), external capsule (E, F) and hippocampus (G, H) 24 h after laparotomy (A, C, E, G) or cecal ligature and puncture (B, D, F, H) in rats that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia. (For illustrations of COX‐2‐immunoreactivity in animals that underwent MRI under isoflurane anesthesia, see figures 3 and 7 of Ref.[15) och: optic chiasm; ec: external capsule. Arrow heads > and < indicate labeling. Scale bar = 100 μm
FIGURE 1Photomicrographs illustrating the distribution of rat IgG‐immunoreactivity in the subfornical organ and ventral hippocampal commissure (A, B), the corpus callosum (C, D), external capsule (E, F), dorsolateral striatum (G, H) and hippocampus (I, J), 24 h after laparotomy (A, C, E, G, I) or cecal ligature and puncture (B, D, F, H, J) in rats that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia. (For illustrations of IgG immunoreactivity in animals that underwent MRI under isoflurane anesthesia, see figure 6.) cc: corpus callosum; ec: external capsule; vhc: ventral hippocampal commissure; SFO: subfornical organ. Arrow heads > and < indicate perivascular diffuse cloud‐like labeling Scale bar = 100 μm
Effects of CLP and MRI under anesthesia on brain perivascular IgG diffusion
| Region | Occurrence × extent/section | ANOVA & Post hoc (Benjamini–Hochberg corrected) |
|---|---|---|
| SSp |
Sh.+: 0.033 ± 0.022; Sh.−: 0.333 ± 0.183 CLP+: 0.061 ± 0.019; CLP−: 0.137 ± 0.066 | MRI |
| SSs |
Sh.+: 0.023 ± 0.023; Sh.−: 0.176 ± 0.054 CLP+: 0.027 ± 0.018; CLP−: 0 |
Surgery Sh.+ < Sh.− Sh.− > CLP− |
| VISC |
Sh.+: 0; Sh.−: 0.085 ± 0.043 CLP+: 0.004 ± 0.004; CLP−: 0.019 ± 0.019 |
MRI Sh.+ < Sh.− Sh.− > CLP− |
| GU |
Sh.+: 0.017 ± 0.017; Sh.−: 0.039 ± 0.023 CLP+: 0.003 ± 0.003; CLP−: 0 | Surgery |
| AI |
Sh.+: 0; Sh.−: 0.057 ± 0.037 CLP+: 0.011 ± 0.011; CLP−: 0.008 ± 0.008 | NS |
| PIR |
Sh.+: 0.026 ± 0.011; Sh.−: 0.106 ± 0.077 CLP+: 0.020 ± 0.009; CLP−: 0.016 ± 0.012 | NS |
| TT |
Sh.+: 0.010 ± 0.010; Sh.−: 0.038 ± 0.038 CLP+: 0; CLP−: 0 | NS |
| CP |
Sh.+: 0.048 ± 0.017; Sh.−: 0.277 ± 0.157 CLP+: 0.119 ± 0.042; CLP−: 0.028 ± 0.028 | NS |
| GPe |
Sh.+: 0; Sh.−: 0.019 ± 0.019 CLP+: 0; CLP−: 0 | NS |
| DG |
Sh.+: 0.018 ± 0.018; Sh.−: 0.028 ± 0.028 CLP+: 0; CLP−: 0 | NS |
| cc‐ec |
Sh.+: 0.101 ± 0.079; Sh.−: 0.471 ± 0.234 CLP+: 0.142 ± 0.069; CLP−: 0.384 ± 0.135 | NS |
| ec |
Sh.+: 0.026 ± 0.015; Sh.−: 0.147 ± 0.086 CLP+: 0.063 ± 0.038; CLP−: 0.141 ± 0.057 | NS |
| fi |
Sh.+: 0.116 ± 0.078; Sh.−: 0.059 ± 0.028 CLP+: 0; CLP−: 0.015 ± 0.015 | NS |
Occurrence multiplied by extension score of perivascular of IgG staining per section for different brain structures. The left column displays brain structures based on Swanson's rat brain atlas, the middle column shows means ± SEM for the four experimental groups and the right column contains a summary of ANOVA and post hoc tests (when appropriate).
Abbreviations: AI, agranular insular cortex; cc‐ec, corpus callosum‐external capsule transition zone; CLP−, Cecal ligature and puncture‐operated animals that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia 24 h later; CLP+, Cecal ligature and puncture‐operated rats that were subject to MRI under isoflurane anesthesia one day later; CP, caudate putamen; DG, dentate gyrus; ec, external capsule; fi, fimbria; GPe, external globus pallidus; GU, gustatory area; NS, nonsignificant; PIR, piriform cortex; Sh−, Sham‐operated animals that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia 24 h later; Sh+, Sham‐operated rats that were subject to MRI under isoflurane anesthesia one day later; SSp, primary somatosensory cortex; SSs, secondary somatosensory cortex; TT, tenia tecta; VISC, visceral area.
FIGURE 3Photomicrographs illustrating the distribution of COX‐2‐immunoreactivity in the cortex of rats that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia (A, B) and of animals that were subject to MRI under anesthesia (C, D) 24 h after laparotomy (Sham: A, C) or cecal ligature and puncture (CLP: B, D). Scale bar = 100 μm. Quantification of cortical COX‐2‐immunoreactive cells (E) and surface (F) showing means ± SEM 24 h after cecal ligature (CLP) and puncture or laparotomy (Sham) in animal that underwent or not MRI under anesthesia (MRI±, respectively). ir: immunoreactivity *P < .05. ***P < .001. Group sizes Sham MRI−: n = 4; CLP MRI−: n = 5; Sham MRI+: n = 6; CLP MRI+: n = 7
FIGURE 4Photomicrographs illustrating Iba1‐ir microglia in the corpus callosum after laparotomy (A) or cecal ligature and puncture (B) in rats that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia. (For illustrations of Iba‐1‐immunoreactivity in animals that underwent MRI under isoflurane anesthesia, see figure 8.) Quantitative Fraclac‐based analysis of microglial circularity (C) and width (D) in the corpus callosum showing means ± SEM for the four experimental groups. ir: immunoreactivity *P < .05. Group sizes Sham MRI−: n = 4; CLP MRI−: n = 4; Sham MRI+: n = 9; CLP MRI+: n = 11. Scale bar = 100 μm
FIGURE 5Photomicrographs illustrating GFAP‐ir astrocytes in the corpus callosum after laparotomy (A) or cecal ligature and puncture (B) in rats that did not undergo MRI under isoflurane anesthesia. (For illustrations of GFAP‐immunoreactivity in animals that underwent MRI under isoflurane anesthesia, see figure 9.) Quantitative analysis of Fraclac‐based astrocyte circularity (C) and width (D) in the corpus callosum showing means ± SEM for the four experimental groups. ir: immunoreactivity *P < .05. Group sizes Sham MRI−: n = 4; CLP MRI−: n = 4; Sham MRI+: n = 9; CLP MRI+: n = 11. Scale bar = 100 μm