| Literature DB >> 34557243 |
Parisa Shahbazi1, Ahmad Nematollahi1, Sanaz Arshadi1, Hosein Hashemzadeh Farhang2, Amir Ali Shahbazfar1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A specific treatment has not yet developed for cryptosporidiosis, and some of the used drugs had side effects in immunodeficient patients. The goal of an appropriate remedy is to remove symptoms and improve immune responses in hosts. The current study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Artemisia spicigera ethanolic extract in experimentally infected immunosuppressed mice.Entities:
Keywords: Artemisia spicigera; Cryptosporidium parvum; Extract; Mice; Treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34557243 PMCID: PMC8418654 DOI: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i2.6318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Parasitol ISSN: 1735-7020 Impact factor: 1.012
Fig. 1:Experimental infection and treatment in NMRI mice model.
A: Dexamethasone and tetracycline were dosed on alternate days. B: First dose of treatment that repeated per 12 h. C: Day 8 of Immune-Suppression Period. D: Oocyst counting and weight measuring daily. E: Histopathological evaluation
Fig. 2:Microscopic and Molecular analysis of Cryptosporidium oocysts. A: The oocyst in MZN staining showed by an arrow. B: PCR amplification of the 18S rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium; Lanes 1: C. parvum with 840 bp fragment, Lanes 2: negative control, Lanes M: 100-bp molecular marker (CinnaGen Co.Iran)
Fecal oocyst counts (Mean ± SE) in mice groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| C2 | 5.40±4.59 | 5.45±4.60 | 5.51±4.50 | 5.53±4.52 | 5.59±4.38 | 5.6±4.6 |
| T1 | 5.22±4.08 | 5.16±4.29 | 5.10±4.20 | 4.95±4.34 | 5.08±4.53 | 5.12±4.22 |
| T2 | 5.20±4.36 | 5.10±4.38 | 5±4.35 | 4.86±4.08 | 4.9±4.25 | 4.93±4.33 |
| T3 | 4.98±4.08 | 4.93±4.28 | 4.84±4.16 | 4.61±4.14 | 4.77±4.35 | 4.74±4.19 |
| P | 4.86±4.08 | 4.71±3.97 | 4.52±3.69 | 4.12±3.32 | 4.77±4.58 | 4.42±3.39 |
Data are shown as Mean ± SE (in log 10).
Days post-infection.
: Groups a,b,c,d,e: P<0.05 comparison of the same day of treatment in the different groups
a. The statistical difference with the group C1; b. Statistical difference with the group C2; c. The statistical difference with the group T1; d. Statistical difference with the group T2; e. The statistical difference with the group T3; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: P<0.05 comparison between days of treatment in the same group
Fig. 3:Ileum histopathological findings in different experimental mice groups: In the C2, A: Desquamation (big arrows) B: villous atrophy (V/C< 1/3) (head arrow) and hyperplasia of goblet cells (little arrow) (B) are observed. C: In the T3, the villus/crypt length ratios are standard (V/C: 1/3) (C). D: In the C1, the villus/crypt length ratios are standard (V/C: 1/3)