PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review comparing the incidence of infectious complications following transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) in cases utilizing antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) vs cases not utilizing antibiotic prophylaxis (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model and expressed as risk ratio (RR). RR higher than 1 indicates an increased risk of complication in patients undergoing TPB without antibiotics. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05 and 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 1,748 papers were retrieved. After the screening process, 8 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (4 retrospective, and 4 prospective and nonrandomized), reporting on 3,662 patients. A total of 2,368 patients underwent TPB utilizing AP and 1,294 underwent TPB utilizing NAP. The pooled rates of post-biopsy fever from 6 available studies reporting this parameter were 0.69% in the AP group and 0.47% in the NAP group (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.02-44.55, p=0.99). The pooled rates of post-biopsy genitourinary infections from 8 available studies reporting this parameter were 0.11% in the AP group and 0.31% in the NAP group (RR: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.54-8.10, p=0.29). The pooled rates of post-biopsy sepsis over 8 studies reporting this parameter were 0.13% in the AP group and 0.09% in the NAP group (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.21-5.61, p=0.92). The pooled rates of post-biopsy readmission for infections over 8 studies reporting this parameter were 0.13% in the AP group and 0.23% in the NAP group (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.31-5.29, p=0.73). Death due to post-biopsy sepsis did not occur in any study. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found no significant difference in infection rate, fever, sepsis or readmission rate after TPB between those cases utilizing AP and those cases without AP.
PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review comparing the incidence of infectious complications following transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) in cases utilizing antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) vs cases not utilizing antibiotic prophylaxis (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model and expressed as risk ratio (RR). RR higher than 1 indicates an increased risk of complication in patients undergoing TPB without antibiotics. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05 and 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 1,748 papers were retrieved. After the screening process, 8 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (4 retrospective, and 4 prospective and nonrandomized), reporting on 3,662 patients. A total of 2,368 patients underwent TPB utilizing AP and 1,294 underwent TPB utilizing NAP. The pooled rates of post-biopsy fever from 6 available studies reporting this parameter were 0.69% in the AP group and 0.47% in the NAP group (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.02-44.55, p=0.99). The pooled rates of post-biopsy genitourinary infections from 8 available studies reporting this parameter were 0.11% in the AP group and 0.31% in the NAP group (RR: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.54-8.10, p=0.29). The pooled rates of post-biopsy sepsis over 8 studies reporting this parameter were 0.13% in the AP group and 0.09% in the NAP group (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.21-5.61, p=0.92). The pooled rates of post-biopsy readmission for infections over 8 studies reporting this parameter were 0.13% in the AP group and 0.23% in the NAP group (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.31-5.29, p=0.73). Death due to post-biopsy sepsis did not occur in any study. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found no significant difference in infection rate, fever, sepsis or readmission rate after TPB between those cases utilizing AP and those cases without AP.
Authors: Joseph Kai Man Li; Lynn Lin Wang; Becky Su Yan Lau; Ryan Tsz Hei Tse; Carol Ka Lo Cheng; Steven Chi Ho Leung; Christine Yim Ping Wong; Stephen Kwok Wing Tsui; Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh; Peter Ka Fung Chiu; Chi Fai Ng Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 6.073