Rhona Muir1, Shareen Forbes2, David J S Birch1, Vladislav Vyshemirsky3, Olaf J Rolinski1. 1. Photophysics Group, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Glasgow G4 0NG, U.K. 2. BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, U.K. 3. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
Abstract
Collagen's long half-life (in skin approximately 10 years) makes this protein highly susceptible to glycation and formation of the advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Accumulation of cross-linking AGEs in the skin collagen has several detrimental effects; thus, the opportunity for non-invasive monitoring of skin glycation is essential, especially for diabetic patients. In this paper, we report using the time-resolved intrinsic fluorescence of collagen as a biomarker of its glycation. Contrary to the traditional fluorescence intensity decay measurement at the arbitrarily selected excitation and detection wavelengths, we conducted systematic wavelength- and time-resolved measurements to achieve time-resolved emission spectra. Changes in the intrinsic fluorescence kinetics, caused by both collagen aggregation and glycation, have been detected.
Collagen's long half-life (in skin approximately 10 years) makes this protein highly susceptible to glycation and formation of the advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Accumulation of cross-linking AGEs in the skin collagen has several detrimental effects; thus, the opportunity for non-invasive monitoring of skin glycation is essential, especially for diabetic patients. In this paper, we report using the time-resolved intrinsic fluorescence of collagen as a biomarker of its glycation. Contrary to the traditional fluorescence intensity decay measurement at the arbitrarily selected excitation and detection wavelengths, we conducted systematic wavelength- and time-resolved measurements to achieve time-resolved emission spectra. Changes in the intrinsic fluorescence kinetics, caused by both collagen aggregation and glycation, have been detected.
Diabetes
is a chronic, progressive disease characterized by elevated
blood glucose levels. The increased amount of glucose in the blood
associated with diabetes leads to various diabetic complications[1] such as cardiovascular and vascular diseases,
stroke, kidney failure, amputation, retinopathy, and neuropathy.[2,3] It has been reported[4] that these complications
are frequently related to the formation of compounds known as advanced
glycation end products (AGEs).[5,6]Proteins with
a long biological half-life are more likely than
other proteins to experience glycation and AGE formation. Collagen
half-life varies between tissues, and in skin is approximately 10
years,[5] which makes it highly susceptible
to glycation and AGE formation.[6] On collagen,
glucose binds to a free lysine residue[7] to form a Schiff Base and follows the classical glycation pathway.
The AGEs can be in the form of adducts or cross-links within or between
the proteins.[8] Accumulation of cross-linking
AGEs in collagen has several detrimental effects: the collagen triple
helix becomes less soluble and flexible,[5] reduced arterial and myocardial compliance, increased vascular stiffness,
and increased diastolic function and systolic hypertension.[9] Collagen glycation also augments formation and
migration of myofibroblasts, which contributes to fibrosis in diabetes,[10] and it is related to the duration and severity
of hyperglycaemia.[11,12]The risk of diabetes complications
can be predicted by identifying
the presence of AGEs in the dermal tissue. The studies have found[13] that long-term treatment of hyperglycaemia reduced
the levels of AGEs in the skin collagen. This suggests that skin AGEs,
including collagen AGEs, can be used as a biomarker for diabetes complications.[14]In this paper, we study the potential
for using the time-resolved
intrinsic fluorescence of collagen as a biomarker of its glycation.
Fluorescence spectroscopy has been used extensively to study the formation
and accumulation of AGEs both in vitro[15,16] and in vivo.[14,17] Specifically, the use of three naturally fluorescent amino acids:
phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine,[18] allows the non-invasive study of biological structures and processes
without the addition of any extrinsic fluorophore.Collagen’s
fluorescence in the human skin[17] originates
from two sources: tyrosine (Tyr)[19,20] and collagen
cross-links. As there are no tryptophan[21] or phenylalanine[22] residues in collagen,
they do not interfere with Tyr. It can be
excited at approximately 275–280 nm and has peak fluorescence
emission at 305 nm.[20]There are two
types of collagen cross-links:[23] pepsin-digestible
and collagenase-digestible. The former
are excited at approximately 340 nm and emit at 400 nm, and the latter
are excited at 360 nm with a fluorescence emission peak at 440 nm.[17] Although it is not clear what structural differences
there are between these two sets of cross-links, it has been confirmed
experimentally[23] that fluorescence from
collagen cross-links does have two distinct bands. Kollias et al.[17] showed that the fluorescence intensity at 400
nm greatly reduced following pepsin digestion, but this had no effect
on the fluorescence emission peak at 440 nm. The opposite was true
for collagenase digestion, where there was no effect on the 400 nm
peak, but the emission at 440 nm almost disappeared.AGE accumulation
drives more cross-linking within collagen fibers,
and so impacts its intrinsic fluorescence,[24] making fluorescence emission spectra a valuable tool for monitoring
AGE accumulation.[25,26]Indeed, previous studies
have used skin auto-fluorescence as a
means of studying glycation-induced changes both in diabetic patients
and healthy controls.[25,26] The steady-state technique, however,
is not able to fully explain the mechanisms of glycation and so help
in the search for anti-glycation factors that could prevent AGE formation.Here, we propose a more comprehensive detection of the intrinsic
fluorescence by performing systematic time- and wavelength-resolved
measurements, instead of performing a single measurement of the fluorescence
intensity decay at the arbitrary selected excitation and detection
wavelengths. Our method explores the time-resolved emission spectra
(TRES) obtained at discrete times throughout the fluorescence decays.[27] Changes in TRES of the intrinsic fluorophores
observed in aggregating proteins are usually complex,[28,29] as they are caused by the compilation of multiple effects, mainly
the heterogeneity of the sample and the dielectric relaxation of fluorophores.
In these studies, we aim to verify whether the alterations in TRES
triggered by collagen glycation are sufficient to help in understanding
the actual mechanisms of glycation, and thus potential pathways of
its prevention.
Materials and Methods
We have studied
the time-resolved responses of tyrosine (excitation
at 280 nm) and of pepsin-digestible cross-links (excitation at 340
nm) in the collagen. Two samples were analyzed: free collagen and
collagen-glucose solutions.
Tyrosine
Sample preparation followed
the same protocol
in both cases. Collagen type 1 solution from rat-tail and phosphate-buffered
saline pH 7.4 (PBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used to
prepare a free collagen sample of concentration 10 μM. The collagen-glucose
sample was then prepared by adding the glucose powder (Sigma-Aldrich)
to make a sample containing 10 μM collagen and 20 mM glucose.
Both samples were stored in an oven at 37 °C for the duration
of the experiments. All measurements were carried out using 4 ×
1 × 1 cm quartz cuvettes.
Pepsin Digestible Cross-Links
The collagen sample had
a concentration of 20 μM, and the collagen–glucose sample
contained 20 μM collagen and 40 mM glucose. Higher concentrations
of both collagen and glucose were used to optimize the experiment,
as the experiments at the original lower concentration showed that
the fluorescence intensity at 340 nm excitation wavelength was too
low, compromising the proper signal-to-noise ratio.In the glucose-containing
samples, the glycated collagen was not purified from the non-glycated
one. The first fluorescence measurements were taken within ∼20
min of glucose being added to the sample.Corrected fluorescence
emission spectra were obtained on a Fluorolog
(HORIBA Scientific) using a resolution of 1 nm, with both the excitation
and emission monochromators set to a slit width of 5 nm. The fluorescence
intensity decay measurements, and therefore, the TRES were obtained
using a DeltaFlex fluorescence lifetime system (Horiba Jobin Yvon
IBH Ltd, Glasgow), which uses time-correlated single photon counting
(TCSPC) to record fluorescence decay. Two nanoLEDs with a repetition
rate of 1 MHz and the peak excitation wavelengths at 280 nm (pulse
duration <1 ns) and 340 nm (pulse duration <1 ns) were used
to study tyrosine and pepsin-digestible cross-links, respectively.
To determine TRES, the fluorescence decays were recorded at a range
of detection wavelengths (300–400 nm for Tyr, 380–500
nm for cross-links), in increments of 10 nm.For both sub-experiments,
the decays measured at each wavelength
λ were then fitted to the experimental fluorescence curve Iexp(t)which was assumed to be a combination of the
fluorescence intensity decay Iλ(t) represented by 2(where α(λ)
and τ(λ) are the i-th pre-exponential component and its
related fluorescence lifetime, respectively), B which
is the background fluorescence, and Cλ(t) which is the scattered excitation light. Including
the actual scattered excitation light Cλ(t) (the fraction of the prompt function shifted
in time due to the detecting photomultiplier’s temporal dependence
on wavelength) into the model of the experimental curve enables an
accurate fluorescence decay fitting also in the case when the experimental
decay has a large contribution of the scattered light.[30] The Supporting Information presents the examples of fitting eq and the traditional model decay (eq only, with an extra exponential component
with the fixed time constant equal to 1/2 of the MCA time calibration
value representing the scattered light) to the same decay data (see Figures S1–S6). The differences in the
results obtained in both approaches are mostly negligible. For TRES
calculations, we used the results recovered from fitting eq to the data, as the model of the
measured signal assumed in this approach is more realistic.For the data obtained for both collagen and collagen-glucose samples,
a 3-exponential model (N = 3) was found to be sufficient
to describe all fluorescence decays on the basis of the goodness-of-fit
criterion (χ2) and the distributions of residuals
(see examples in the Supporting Information). Contrary to the common approach, however, we do not claim that
this indicates 3-exponential kinetics but rather that the 3-exponential
function is a good mathematical representation of the observed decays.Once values for α(λ) and
τ(λ) were obtained, they
were used to construct the TRESwhere S(λ) is the steady-state
fluorescence intensity at the emission wavelength λ at which
fluorescence decay was recorded. The TRES was finally converted to
a function of wavenumber νThis procedure generates a series of fluorescence intensity
spectra
as a function of wavenumber ν, with each spectra representing
fluorescence at a different time t after excitation.The next stage involved fitting a “technical” model
of TRES to the experimental TRES, namely, we used the modified multiple
Toptygin-type distribution[31] to represent
the shape of spectral components.In this model, M is the number of spectral
components, C is the
contribution of each
component to fluorescence, v is the peak position, and σ is the half-width of the distribution. The term is the normalization
factor for this
equation. Note, that the Franck–Condon factor envelope[31] is approximated here by a Gaussian function
instead of a more realistic skewed function. This allows a reduction
in the number of model 5 parameters, which was
necessary because of the limited number of experimental TRES points
calculated in TCSPC analysis. The model function 5 was fitted to the experimental TRES points, and the potential mechanisms
of the observed changes in TRES were discussed on the basis of the
goodness of fit obtained for different M, and the
changes in v(t), C(t), and σ(t) values. The experimental TRES points and the corresponding model
TRES curves were found for day 0, and for various subsequent days
after preparation. The examples of the obtained plots are shown in
the Supporting Information (Figures S7
and S8).
Results and Discussion
Tyrosine Responses (Excitation
280 nm)
Figure shows the fluorescence emission
spectra for free collagen and collagen-glucose over 56 days, where
the samples were excited at 280 nm to observe the response of tyrosine.
The absolute fluorescence intensities of both collagen and collagen–glucose
decrease over the 56 days, as shown in Figure A.
Figure 1
Fluorescence emission spectra for free collagen
and collagen–glucose
when excited at 280 nm. (A) Fluorescence changes over time for collagen
and collagen–glucose at days 0, 4, 14, 21, 28, and 56. (B)
Collagen (black) and collagen-glucose (red) on days 0, 4, 14, 21,
28, and 56, with both samples’ spectra normalized to their
peak fluorescence.
Fluorescence emission spectra for free collagen
and collagen–glucose
when excited at 280 nm. (A) Fluorescence changes over time for collagen
and collagen–glucose at days 0, 4, 14, 21, 28, and 56. (B)
Collagen (black) and collagen-glucose (red) on days 0, 4, 14, 21,
28, and 56, with both samples’ spectra normalized to their
peak fluorescence.Changes observed in both
samples could be due to aggregation and/or
glycation, as both processes may affect the conformation of the protein,
including the local microenvironment of tyrosine. Figure B presents the pairs of spectra
at individual days normalized to 1. The narrower spectra observed
in the collagen–glucose sample may be a result of glycation,
where the presence of the collagen–glucose aggregates reduces
the formation of bigger collagen aggregates and consequently reduces
the broadening of the spectrum reflecting the narrower range of the
π electron spatial distribution. This hypothesis is further
supported by TRES results discussed in the later section. It should
be noted that we do not consider the potential degrading effects of
UV illumination on the sample, as the intensities of light used in
our measurements are minimal.Additional information has been
extracted from the analysis of
TRES of both samples. This was implemented through a series of fluorescence
intensity decays recorded when exciting the collagen’s Tyr
at 280 nm. The decays were detected at the range 300—400 nm
in increments of 10 nm (as in the example for day 0 shown in Figure ). Figure demonstrates a strong lifetime-wavelength
dependence, where fluorescence at the shorter detection wavelengths
decays more rapidly than at the longer wavelengths. This is consistent
with the lifetime-wavelength correlation observed in proteins[32] and is usually caused by dielectric relaxation
of intrinsic fluorophores.
Figure 2
Fluorescence intensity decays for the collagen
on day 0, excited
at 279 nm. Part A shows the emission wavelengths from 300–350
nm in increments of 10 nm and
part B shows the emission wavelengths from 360–400 nm. Both
plots are shown with the prompt signal (black).
Fluorescence intensity decays for the collagen
on day 0, excited
at 279 nm. Part A shows the emission wavelengths from 300–350
nm in increments of 10 nm and
part B shows the emission wavelengths from 360–400 nm. Both
plots are shown with the prompt signal (black).The decays recorded at various times after sample preparation were
used to calculate the TRES for both collagen and collagen–glucose
samples. These plots, along with their related normalization plots,
are shown in Figure . Part A (absolute spectra) and E (normalized spectra) show the result
obtained for both samples on day 0, where no effect of glycation is
expected yet. In this case, the spectra for both the free collagen
and collagen–glucose samples are very similar, with the intensity
gradually decreasing within nanoseconds. This similarity demonstrates
the robustness of the experimental and data processing procedures
that were used for TRES calculation.
Figure 3
TRES spectra of free collagen (black)
and collagen-glucose (red)
on day 0 (A), day 14 (B), day 28 (C), and day 56 (D). Plots (E–H)
show the same spectra after normalization.
TRES spectra of free collagen (black)
and collagen-glucose (red)
on day 0 (A), day 14 (B), day 28 (C), and day 56 (D). Plots (E–H)
show the same spectra after normalization.At the later times after sample preparation, differences in the
TRES of both samples are observed, indicating changes in the evolution
of collagen spectra caused by the presence of glucose. To obtain more
quantitative information on the detected effects, the technical model
of TRES (eq ) was fitted
to experimental TRES data. We used the Akaike information criterion[33] (for definition see the Supporting Information) to optimize the number M of the components of the eq . It has been found (see Table T1 in the Supporting Information) that to avoid over parametrization
of the model, only one component (M = 1) should be
used. Note that such a result does not imply homogeneous dielectric
relaxation because the same shapes of the normalized TRES are not
observed here. The evolution of the recovered v(t), log(C(t)), and σ(t) values are plotted in Figure .
Figure 4
Plots (A,D) show the time evolution of the peak
position v(t) of the emitting fluorophores
for collagen
and collagen–glucose, respectively, excited at 280 nm. The
time evolution of fluorescence intensity C(t) is
shown for collagen and collagen–glucose in plots (B,E), with
each spectra normalized. The inset shows the same data over a longer
time range. The six lines show day 0, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28,
and day 56. Plots (C,F) show the changes in σ parameters (see eq ). Part (G) shows (t) for collagen and collagen-glucose on day 0 for comparison,
with the error bars showing the 90% confidence intervals for the fitted
values.
Plots (A,D) show the time evolution of the peak
position v(t) of the emitting fluorophores
for collagen
and collagen–glucose, respectively, excited at 280 nm. The
time evolution of fluorescence intensity C(t) is
shown for collagen and collagen–glucose in plots (B,E), with
each spectra normalized. The inset shows the same data over a longer
time range. The six lines show day 0, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28,
and day 56. Plots (C,F) show the changes in σ parameters (see eq ). Part (G) shows (t) for collagen and collagen-glucose on day 0 for comparison,
with the error bars showing the 90% confidence intervals for the fitted
values.Initially, at day 0, the peak
position of the emitting fluorophore v(t) is ∼31,500 cm–1 for both samples. Over
the 10 ns following excitation, the peaks
show a shift to longer wavelengths, ending at ∼29,200 cm–1. We note that at day 0 there was no difference between
the spectral shifts in the free collagen and glucose-collagen samples
(see Figure G). Over
the 56 days, however, the initial peak position νpeak(t) of the un-glycated sample (Figure A) steadily decreased, still
following the same pattern of a spectral shift toward longer wavelengths,
thus suggesting collagen aggregation. On the other hand, the ν(t)
in the glycated sample (Figure D) remained similar over the 56 days. This indicates that
the aggregation of collagen is hindered by the glycation process.
This observation is consistent with the narrower steady-state fluorescence
spectra shown in Figure B. Moreover, Figure B,E shows that the normalized fluorescence decays C(t) of tyrosine in collagen and collagen–glucose
samples, do not change substantially. Figure C,F presents falls in σ(t) factors occurring on the ns time scale, indicating that the spectrum
becomes narrower at the later times after excitation. We explain this
observation by the existence of the collagen aggregates characterized
by a continuous and narrow distribution of spectral peaks and dielectric
relaxation times, rather than two or more distinct aggregates, which
would lead to the optimal M = 2 or more in data analysis.To conclude this section, the broader Tyr steady-state fluorescence
spectra and the systematic red shift of the TRES in the sample of
free collagen suggest collagen aggregation, which leads to increasing
volumes of the individual aggregates. Moreover, the narrower steady-state
spectra and reduced changes in the spectral shifts observed in the
presence of glycation indicates that the collagen aggregation is limited
by glucose. However, glucose does not affect the fluorescence decays
of tyrosines.
The fluorescence responses of pepsin-digestible cross-links
in
collagen were studied by exciting the collagen and collagen–glucose
samples at 340 nm. Figure A shows how the steady-state fluorescence spectrum of each
sample evolves over time. Free collagen initially has the fluorescence
peak at ∼405 nm. The intensity of the spectrum then increases,
mostly during the first 7 days, and undergoes a red spectral shift
up to ∼425 nm on day 35.
Figure 5
Fluorescence emission spectra for free
collagen and collagen glucose
when excited at 340 nm. (A) Fluorescence changes over time for collagen
and collagen–glucose at days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 35. (B) Collagen
(black) and collagen–glucose (red) on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and
35, with both samples spectra normalized to a peak fluorescence.
Fluorescence emission spectra for free
collagen and collagen glucose
when excited at 340 nm. (A) Fluorescence changes over time for collagen
and collagen–glucose at days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 35. (B) Collagen
(black) and collagen–glucose (red) on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and
35, with both samples spectra normalized to a peak fluorescence.The fluorescence spectrum of the collagen–glucose
sample
increases steadily over the 35 days. It reaches a higher value and
is broader than the spectrum of the free collagen sample.Figure B allows
for the comparison of the fluorescence emission of free collagen and
collagen–glucose samples over 35 days, with both spectra normalized.
From day 0, the sample with glucose shows a broader spectrum, and
there is also a difference in the wavelength of peak fluorescence:
∼405 nm for free collagen, which moves gradually to 425, and
∼425 nm for collagen–glucose, which remains stable.
We attribute the emission in the 400–430 nm range to the formation
of dityrosine from the neighboring tyrosine residues[34] and this process occurs in both the free collagen and glucose–collagen
samples. However, the further increase in the fluorescence intensity
and the shift of the spectra observed in the collagen–glucose
sample only is likely to be an indication of multiple cross-links
formed between glycated collagen molecules.[14,16]To gain further information, TRES measurements were performed
at
various time points after sample preparation, at detection wavelengths
from 390–500 nm. The absolute and normalized TRES for collagen
and collagen–glucose are presented in Figure .
Figure 6
Examples of TRES spectra of free collagen (black)
and collagen–glucose
(red) on day 0 (A), day 14 (B), day 21 (C), and day 35 (D). Plots
(E–H) show the same spectra after normalization.
Examples of TRES spectra of free collagen (black)
and collagen–glucose
(red) on day 0 (A), day 14 (B), day 21 (C), and day 35 (D). Plots
(E–H) show the same spectra after normalization.The TRES of free collagen (black curves) on day 0 show no
change
in their shape during the decay (see the plot of normalized spectra,
black curves in Figure E), indicating no ns time scale processes. The broad peak of the
spectrum at the range ∼24,700 and ∼23,300 cm–1, that is, 405–429 nm, is consistent with the steady-state
spectra. The measurements performed at later days show a peak at ∼21,100
cm–1, that is, 475 nm, and the gradual transition
of the fluorescence peak toward the red on a nanosecond time scale.In the sample containing glucose (red spectra), TRES data show
a similar transition; however, the emission peak at 475 nm is already
apparent at day 0, which may suggest that glucose accelerates the
formation of this fluorescent residue. The direct inspection of TRES
suggests at least two fluorescent residues.Indeed, although
the analysis of the Akaike information criterion
(see Table T2) again requires the consideration
of a one-component Toptygin model (M = 1), the analysis
of the evolution of the v(t) parameter
is characteristic for multicomponent kinetics (Figure ), which we explain below.
Figure 7
Plots (A,C) show the
time evolution of the peak position v(t) of the emitting fluorophores for collagen
and collagen–glucose, respectively, excited at 340 nm. The
normalized time evolution of the fluorescence intensity C(t) is shown for collagen and collagen–glucose in
plots (B,D). The inset shows the same data over a longer timer range.
The five lines show day 0, day 7, day 14, day 21, and day 35. Part
(E) shows (t) for collagen and collagen–glucose
on day 0 for comparison, with the error bars showing the 90% confidence
intervals for the fitted values.
Plots (A,C) show the
time evolution of the peak position v(t) of the emitting fluorophores for collagen
and collagen–glucose, respectively, excited at 340 nm. The
normalized time evolution of the fluorescence intensity C(t) is shown for collagen and collagen–glucose in
plots (B,D). The inset shows the same data over a longer timer range.
The five lines show day 0, day 7, day 14, day 21, and day 35. Part
(E) shows (t) for collagen and collagen–glucose
on day 0 for comparison, with the error bars showing the 90% confidence
intervals for the fitted values.The initial (Day 0) peak position of the free collagen spectrum
starts at ∼22,500 cm–1 (Figure A) and at ∼22,000 cm–1 for collagen–glucose (Figure C) and they behave differently, see Figure E for comparison.
There is no shift in v(t) following
excitation for free collagen at day 0; however, the measurements taken
on the later days show a substantial drop of the initial v(t) to ∼20,900 cm–1. All v(t) dependencies show a further red shift
during the first 2 ns, and then the v(t) plots start to increase (which is most visible for the data obtained
on day 7). Again, this observation contradicts the homogeneous dielectric
relaxation process, where the monotonic red shift is expected. It
can only be explained by the fluorescence of a number of species of
individual fluorescence lifetimes, dielectric relaxation rates, and
so forth. Obtaining M = 1 in the Akaike analysis
can be again explained by the presence of aggregates characterized
by a distribution of fluorescence characteristics, rather than a small
number of aggregates of distinctively different parameters.The v(t) for the collagen–glucose
sample on day 0 drops from 22,000 to ∼20,500 cm–1 during the first 2 ns. In the case of older samples, the starting
value of v(t) is ∼20,600
cm–1 which is also followed by a similar red shift
within the first 2 ns. This behavior of v(t) demonstrates that in the presence of glucose, the formation
of cross-links occurs differently, leading to only one type of the
fluorescent cross-link.The log(C(t)) curves (Figure B,D) seem to confirm
this observation. The changes in the rates of the decays on different
days in the pure collagen sample (Figure B) are not monotonic. Indeed, the decay in
Day 7 is faster than in Day 0, and then it slows down again at the
later days. This suggests the presence of multiple fluorescent cross-links
whose contributions change over time. The decays observed in the glycated
sample (Figure D),
however, show a stable trend of decreasing decay rates, which is likely
to be observed when there is a single or a set of uniform fluorescent
residues.To conclude, in a pure collagen sample, more than
one type of fluorescent
cross-link is formed in the 35 day period, while in the collagen–glucose
sample, a single fluorescent form is created, demonstrating a substantial
impact of glycation on collagen aggregation.
Conclusions
The effects of glucose on collagen’s intrinsic fluorescence
has been studied using a TRES-based technique. Our aim was to identify
the characteristic features of the excited-state kinetics occurring
in the glucose-triggered aggregation of collagen. Intrinsic fluorescence
responses were collected for the excitation wavelengths 280 and 340
nm to observe changes in the fluorescence of intrinsic tyrosine and
fluorescent cross-links.It has been found that glucose does
not have a substantial impact
on the fluorescence of intrinsic Tyr (excitation at 280 nm). Indeed,
as glucose binds to collagen at lysine residues, and lysine makes
up only 3.9% of collagen,[15,35] formation of lysine–glucose
complexes is not likely to impact Tyr’s local microenvironment.
Nevertheless, the TRES of both free collagen and collagen–glucose
samples excited at 280 nm do change over time, which is due to protein
aggregation.Glucose, however, does have a substantial influence
on the formation
of pepsin-digestible collagen cross-links emitting at λ >
400
nm (excitation at 340 nm). The observed changes in TRES show the impact
of glucose on the formation pathways of new cross-links and protein
aggregates.However, as the TRES approach that we have used
does not assume
any specific model of the underlying excited state kinetics; further
studies will be required to identify the best fit model of the kinetics
and for determining the molecular mechanisms involved.
Authors: Saul Genuth; Wanjie Sun; Patricia Cleary; David R Sell; William Dahms; John Malone; William Sivitz; Vincent M Monnier Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: R Meerwaldt; R Graaff; P H N Oomen; T P Links; J J Jager; N L Alderson; S R Thorpe; J W Baynes; R O B Gans; A J Smit Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2004-07-09 Impact factor: 10.122