Min Xie1, Xiaogai Xu2, Zhenjie Cao3, Huijie Xiao4. 1. Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. 2. Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Shanxi (Women Health Center of Shanxi), Taiyuan, China. 3. Pediatric Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a risk factor for various renal problems like recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), pyelonephritis, renal scarring, hypertension, and other renal parenchymal defects. The interventions followed by pediatricians include low-dose antibiotic treatment, surgical correction, and endoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of various primary VUR treatment options. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of journals, and abstracts from conference proceedings were all used to find randomized controlled trials. The articles were retrieved from 1985 till 2020. Twenty articles were used for the data analysis. Criteria for Selection: Surgery, long-term antibiotic prophylaxis, noninvasive techniques, and any mix of therapies are also options for treating VUR. Collection and Interpretation of Data: Two authors searched the literature separately, determining research qualifications, assessing accuracy, and extracting and entering results. The odds ratio (OR) of these studies was used to construct the forest plot. The random-effects model was used to pool the data. Also, the random-effects model was used with statistical significance at a p value < 0.05 to assess the difference in side effects after treatment of VUR using different modalities. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences between surgery plus antibiotics and antibiotic alone-treated patients in terms of recurrent UTIs (OR = 0.581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259-1.30), renal parenchymal defects (OR = 1.149; 95% CI 0.75-1.754), and renal scarring (OR = 1.042; 95% CI 0.72-1.50). However, the risk of developing pyelonephritis after surgical treatment of VUR was lesser than that in the conservative approach, that is, antibiotics (OR = 0.345; 95% CI 0.126-0.946.), positive urine culture (OR = 0.617; 95% CI 0.428-0.890), and recurrent UTIs were more common in the placebo group than in the antibiotic group (p < 0.05; OR = 0.639; 95% CI 0.436-0.936) which is statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Based on current research, we recommend that a child with a UTI and significant VUR be treated conservatively at first, with surgical care reserved for children who have issues with antimicrobials or have clinically significant VUR that persists after several years of follow-up.
PURPOSE: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a risk factor for various renal problems like recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), pyelonephritis, renal scarring, hypertension, and other renal parenchymal defects. The interventions followed by pediatricians include low-dose antibiotic treatment, surgical correction, and endoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of various primary VUR treatment options. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of journals, and abstracts from conference proceedings were all used to find randomized controlled trials. The articles were retrieved from 1985 till 2020. Twenty articles were used for the data analysis. Criteria for Selection: Surgery, long-term antibiotic prophylaxis, noninvasive techniques, and any mix of therapies are also options for treating VUR. Collection and Interpretation of Data: Two authors searched the literature separately, determining research qualifications, assessing accuracy, and extracting and entering results. The odds ratio (OR) of these studies was used to construct the forest plot. The random-effects model was used to pool the data. Also, the random-effects model was used with statistical significance at a p value < 0.05 to assess the difference in side effects after treatment of VUR using different modalities. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences between surgery plus antibiotics and antibiotic alone-treated patients in terms of recurrent UTIs (OR = 0.581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259-1.30), renal parenchymal defects (OR = 1.149; 95% CI 0.75-1.754), and renal scarring (OR = 1.042; 95% CI 0.72-1.50). However, the risk of developing pyelonephritis after surgical treatment of VUR was lesser than that in the conservative approach, that is, antibiotics (OR = 0.345; 95% CI 0.126-0.946.), positive urine culture (OR = 0.617; 95% CI 0.428-0.890), and recurrent UTIs were more common in the placebo group than in the antibiotic group (p < 0.05; OR = 0.639; 95% CI 0.436-0.936) which is statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Based on current research, we recommend that a child with a UTI and significant VUR be treated conservatively at first, with surgical care reserved for children who have issues with antimicrobials or have clinically significant VUR that persists after several years of follow-up.
Authors: Julian Wan; Steven J Skoog; William C Hulbert; Anthony J Casale; Saul P Greenfield; Earl Y Cheng; Craig A Peters Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jonathan C Craig; Judy M Simpson; Gabrielle J Williams; Alison Lowe; Graham J Reynolds; Steven J McTaggart; Elisabeth M Hodson; Jonathan R Carapetis; Noel E Cranswick; Grahame Smith; Les M Irwig; Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Leslie P Roy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 91.245