Literature DB >> 34555558

The significance of the morphology-voltage-P-wave duration (MVP) ECG score for prediction of in-hospital and long-term atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke.

Mert İlker Hayıroğlu1, Tufan Çınar2, Murat Selçuk2, Göksel Çinier3, Bryce Alexander4, Selami Doğan2, Vedat Çiçek2, Şahhan Kılıç2, Mert Murat Atmaca5, Ahmet Lütfullah Orhan2, Adrian Baranchuk4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common preventable cause of stroke. Diagnosis of new AF is frequent after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the recently developed morphology-voltage-P-wave duration (MVP) ECG risk score for in-hospital and long-term AF diagnosis following AIS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this observational investigation, we evaluated the ability of the MVP ECG risk score to predict AF in 266 consecutive patients with AIS. The study population was divided into three groups according to their calculated MVP ECG risk score on admission electrocardiography. The groups were compared in terms of their predictive value for in-hospital and long-term AF diagnosis.
RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding baseline variables, MVP ECG risk score 5-6 group had 13.2 times higher rates of in-hospital AF compared to MVP ECG risk score 0-2 group, which was used as the reference group. For long-term follow-up, MVP ECG risk score 5-6 group had 5.2 times higher rates of long-term AF compared to MVP ECG risk score 0-2 group. A ROC analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value of the MVP ECG risk score to predict in-hospital AF was 4 with 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity (AUC: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96; p < 0.001), the optimal cut-off value of the MVP ECG risk score to predict long-term AF was 3 with 85% sensitivity and 59% specificity (AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.86; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The MVP ECG risk score, which can be easily calculated from a surface ECG, can be used to guide who needs stricter monitoring for the diagnosis of long-term AF in patients with AIS.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Interatrial block; Ischemic stroke; P wave

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34555558     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  4 in total

1.  A novel electrocardiographic parameter for the prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery "P wave peak time".

Authors:  Ahmet Zengin; Mehmet Baran Karataş; Yiğit Çanga; Levent Pay; Semih Eren; Ali Nazmi Çalık; Özge Güzelburç
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Electrocardiographic biosignals to predict atrial fibrillation: Are we there yet?

Authors:  Anthony H Kashou; Peter A Noseworthy
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 3.  P Wave Parameters and Indices: A Critical Appraisal of Clinical Utility, Challenges, and Future Research-A Consensus Document Endorsed by the International Society of Electrocardiology and the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology.

Authors:  Lin Yee Chen; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; Pyotr G Platonov; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Elsayed Z Soliman; Bulent Gorenek; Takanori Ikeda; Vassilios P Vassilikos; Jonathan S Steinberg; Niraj Varma; Antoni Bayés-de-Luna; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-03-25

4.  Predicting New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Following Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram.

Authors:  Kangjun Fan; Liang Chen; Fei Liu; Xiaohang Ding; Pengyun Yan; Mingxin Gao; Wenyuan Yu; Hongli Liu; Yang Yu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.