Qing Fu1, Xiang-Chuang Kong2, Ding-Xi Liu3, Kun Zhou4, Yi-Hao Guo5, Ming-Fu Wang6, Zi-Qiao Lei7, Chuan-Sheng Zheng8. 1. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: fuqing1986@yeah.net. 2. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: hongke80@hust.edu.cn. 3. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: liudingxi2008@163.com. 4. Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: kun.zhou@siemens-healthineers.com. 5. MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: yihao.guo@siemens-healthineers.com. 6. Department of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430033, China. Electronic address: 58293754@qq.com. 7. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: ziqiao_lei@hust.edu.cn. 8. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: cszheng@hust.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The complex anatomical structures of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) pose a unique challenge to diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). This study aimed to compare the clinical utility of the prototypic 2D turbo gradient- and spin echo-BLADE-DWI (TGSE-BLADE-DWI) with that of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI (RESOLVE-DWI) and single-shot echo-planar DWI (SS-EPI-DWI) to visualize CPA anatomic structures and identify CPA tumors. METHODS: A total of 8 volunteers and 36 patients with pathological CPA tumors were enrolled to perform the three DWI sequences at 3 T. Scan time of TGSE-BLADE-DWI, RESOLVE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI was 5 min 51 s, 5 min 15 s and 1 min 22 s, respectively. Subjective analysis, including visualization of anatomical structures, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality of the three DWI sequences were scored and assessed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of CPA tumors were measured and compared. RESULTS: A total of 39 lesions were identified, TGSE-BLADE-DWI detected all of them, RESOLVE-DWI 36 and SS-EPI-DWI 27. Significant differences were found in all the subjective parameters among the three DWI sequences (all p < 0.001). TGSE-BLADE-DWI was significantly better than RESOLVE-DWI in visualization of CPA anatomical structures, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality (all p < 0.01), and RESOLVE-DWI showed significantly superior performance than SS-EPI-DWI in all parameters (all p < 0.001). CNRs and ADCs were not significantly different among the three DWI sequences (p = 0.355, p = 0.590, respectively). No significant differences were detected between TGSE-BLADE-DWI SNR and RESOLVE-DWI SNR (p = 0.058), or TGSE-BLADE-DWI SNR and SS-EPI-DWI SNR (p = 0.155). CONCLUSION: Compared with RESOLVE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI, TGSE-BLADE-DWI minimized geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts and demonstrated an improved ability for depicting CPA tumors with better lesion conspicuity. SUMMARY: Geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts are found at bone-air interfaces using conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is a challenge for imaging cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. Our study validated that geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts were not present on 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo-BLADE-DWI scans, making this technique useful for visualizing CPA anatomic structures and diagnosing CPA tumors.
OBJECTIVE: The complex anatomical structures of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) pose a unique challenge to diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). This study aimed to compare the clinical utility of the prototypic 2D turbo gradient- and spin echo-BLADE-DWI (TGSE-BLADE-DWI) with that of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI (RESOLVE-DWI) and single-shot echo-planar DWI (SS-EPI-DWI) to visualize CPA anatomic structures and identify CPA tumors. METHODS: A total of 8 volunteers and 36 patients with pathological CPA tumors were enrolled to perform the three DWI sequences at 3 T. Scan time of TGSE-BLADE-DWI, RESOLVE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI was 5 min 51 s, 5 min 15 s and 1 min 22 s, respectively. Subjective analysis, including visualization of anatomical structures, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality of the three DWI sequences were scored and assessed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of CPA tumors were measured and compared. RESULTS: A total of 39 lesions were identified, TGSE-BLADE-DWI detected all of them, RESOLVE-DWI 36 and SS-EPI-DWI 27. Significant differences were found in all the subjective parameters among the three DWI sequences (all p < 0.001). TGSE-BLADE-DWI was significantly better than RESOLVE-DWI in visualization of CPA anatomical structures, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality (all p < 0.01), and RESOLVE-DWI showed significantly superior performance than SS-EPI-DWI in all parameters (all p < 0.001). CNRs and ADCs were not significantly different among the three DWI sequences (p = 0.355, p = 0.590, respectively). No significant differences were detected between TGSE-BLADE-DWI SNR and RESOLVE-DWI SNR (p = 0.058), or TGSE-BLADE-DWI SNR and SS-EPI-DWI SNR (p = 0.155). CONCLUSION: Compared with RESOLVE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI, TGSE-BLADE-DWI minimized geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts and demonstrated an improved ability for depicting CPA tumors with better lesion conspicuity. SUMMARY: Geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts are found at bone-air interfaces using conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is a challenge for imaging cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. Our study validated that geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts were not present on 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo-BLADE-DWI scans, making this technique useful for visualizing CPA anatomic structures and diagnosing CPA tumors.