| Literature DB >> 34555007 |
Kathleen Dooling, Julia W Gargano, Danielle Moulia, Megan Wallace, Hannah G Rosenblum, Amy E Blain, Stephen C Hadler, Ian D Plumb, Heidi Moline, Jack Gerstein, Jennifer P Collins, Monica Godfrey, Doug Campos-Outcalt, Rebecca L Morgan, Oliver Brooks, H Keipp Talbot, Grace M Lee, Matthew F Daley, Sara E Oliver.
Abstract
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside mRNA vaccine encoding the prefusion spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine consists of 2 intramuscular doses (30 μg, 0.3 mL each) administered 3 weeks apart. In December 2020, the vaccine was granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well as an interim recommendation for use among persons aged ≥16 years by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) (1). In May 2021, the EUA and interim ACIP recommendations for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were extended to adolescents aged 12-15 years (2). During December 14, 2020-September 1, 2021, approximately 211 million doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were administered in the United States.* On August 23, 2021, FDA approved a Biologics License Application for use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty (Pfizer, Inc.), in persons aged ≥16 years (3). The ACIP COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group's conclusions regarding the evidence for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were presented to ACIP at a public meeting on August 30, 2021. To guide its deliberations regarding the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, ACIP used the Evidence to Recommendation (EtR) Framework,† and incorporated a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.§ In addition to initial clinical trial data, ACIP considered new information gathered in the 8 months since issuance of the interim recommendation for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, including additional follow-up time in the clinical trial, real-world vaccine effectiveness studies, and postauthorization vaccine safety monitoring. The additional information increased certainty that benefits from prevention of asymptomatic infection, COVID-19, and associated hospitalization and death outweighs vaccine-associated risks. On August 30, 2021, ACIP issued a recommendation¶ for use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years for the prevention of COVID-19.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34555007 PMCID: PMC8459897 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ISSN: 0149-2195 Impact factor: 17.586
Potential benefits of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation — United States, September 2021
| Potential benefit | Clinical trial evidence | Observational evidence | GRADE evidence type† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of studies | Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) | No. of studies | Pooled vaccine effectiveness* (95% CI) | ||
| Prevention of symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19§ | 1 | 91.1 (88.8 to 93.1) | 8 | 92.4 (87.5 to 95.3) | 1 |
| Prevention of COVID-19–associated hospitalization§ | 1 | 100 (87.6 to 100) | 8 | 94.3 (87.9 to 97.3) | 2 |
| Prevention of COVID-19–associated death | 1 | 83.3 (−38.6 to 98.0) | 4 | 96.1 (91.5 to 98.2) | 2 |
| Prevention of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection | 0 | No data | 2 | 89.3 (88.4 to 90.1) | 4 |
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
* Vaccine effectiveness estimates were pooled for the purposes of GRADE review. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/covid-19-pfizer-biontech-vaccine.html
† GRADE evidence types: 1 = high certainty, 2 = moderate certainty, 3 = low certainty, 4 = very low certainty.
§ Considered a critical outcome in GRADE. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/about-grade.html
Potential harms of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation — United States, September 2021
| Potential harms | Clinical trial evidence | Observational evidence | GRADE evidence type* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of studies | RR (95% CI) | No. of studies | Cases per million doses; RR (95% CI); observed versus expected cases | ||
|
| 2 | 4.7 (3.8–5.7) | 0 | No data | 1 |
|
| 2 | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 0 | No data§ | 2 |
|
| |||||
| Persons aged ≥16 yrs, VAERS | NA | NA | 1 | 4.7 cases per million doses¶ | 3 |
| Persons aged ≥12 yrs, VSD | NA | NA | 1 | 5.0 cases per million doses** | |
|
| |||||
| Males and females aged 18–39 yrs, VSD | NA | NA | 1 | RR = 9.1 (95% CI = 2.1–48.6)†† | 3 |
| Males aged 16–17 yrs, VAERS | NA | NA | 1 | 120 cases observed versus 0–3 expected§§ | |
| Females aged 16–17 yrs, VAERS | NA | NA | 1 | 15 cases observed versus 2 expected§§ | |
| Males aged 30–39 yrs, VAERS | NA | NA | 1 | 40 cases observed versus 1–11 expected¶¶ | |
| Females aged 30–39 yrs, VAERS | NA | NA | 1 | 7 cases observed versus 1–13 expected¶¶ | |
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation; NA = not applicable; RR = relative risk; VAERS = Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; VSD = Vaccine Safety Datalink.
* GRADE evidence types: 1 = high certainty, 2 = moderate certainty, 3 = low certainty, 4 = very low certainty.
† Considered a critical outcome in GRADE. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/about-grade.html
§ Observational evidence did not include an aggregate measure of serious adverse events. Data on specific serious adverse events identified through post-authorization safety surveillance were reviewed. Increased risk for myocarditis and anaphylaxis were observed in VAERS and VSD.
¶ Based on VAERS passively reported cases, in persons aged ≥16 years, occurring in a 0–1-day risk interval after vaccination.
** Based on VSD chart reviewed cases of anaphylaxis, in persons aged ≥12 years, occurring in a 0–1-day risk interval after vaccination (RR = 5.0; 95% CI = 3.5–6.9).
†† Based on VSD chart-reviewed cases of myocarditis occurring among persons aged 18–39 years after dose 2, occurring in a 7-day risk interval after vaccination (368 per million person-years) versus a 22–42 day comparison interval in vaccinated persons (48 per million person-years). Adjusted for VSD site, 5-year age group, sex, race/ethnicity, and calendar date.
§§ Based on VAERS chart-reviewed cases of myocarditis among males and females aged 16–17 years compared with baseline expected cases in the absence of vaccination.
¶¶ Based on VAERS preliminary reports of myocarditis among males and females aged 30–39 years compared with baseline expected cases in the absence of vaccination.