Literature DB >> 3455426

Contribution of specialists to antenatal care in France: impact on level of care during pregnancy and delivery.

B Hubert1, B Blondel, M Kaminski.   

Abstract

This study was based on a survey of a national sample of births in France in 1981 which included 5508 women. Four pathways of antenatal care were defined according to the stage of pregnancy at first intervention of a specialist, as opposed to a general practitioner, in the care of the pregnancy. Taking into account the sociodemographic and medical characteristics of the women in a logistic regression, a large number of antenatal visits, an ultrasound examination, and hospitalisation during pregnancy were more frequent when the degree of specialisation of the pathway increased. But the influence of pathways was less significant for deliveries. Caesarean section rates, for example, did not vary according to pathway. However, induction of labour and intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring were less frequent among women cared for solely by a general practitioner than among those who had consulted a specialist at least once during pregnancy. The increase in medical care and the role of the specialist in antenatal care are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3455426      PMCID: PMC1052654          DOI: 10.1136/jech.41.4.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  12 in total

1.  What determines the start of prenatal care? Prenatal care, insurance, and education.

Authors:  J P Cooney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Adverse outcome of pregnancy and the quality of obstetric care.

Authors:  K Niswander; G Henson; D Elbourne; I Chalmers; C Redman; A Macfarlane; P Tizard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Is routine antenatal care worth while?

Authors:  M H Hall; P K Chng; I MacGillivray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-07-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Distribution of ultrasound examination during pregnancy in France between 1976 and 1981.

Authors:  A S Poisson-Salomon; G Breart; F Maillard; C Rumeau-Rouquette
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Some characteristics of antenatal care in 13 European countries.

Authors:  B Blondel; D Pusch; E Schmidt
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-06

6.  Cesarean section delivery rates: United States, 1981.

Authors:  P J Placek; S Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  [Antenatal care and source of care during pregnancy (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Blondel; M Kaminski; C Du Mazaubrun; C Rumeau-Rouquette
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.019

8.  [Factors determining health practices: prenatal care in rural and urban environment].

Authors:  J M Robine; P Maguin; V Nicaud; F Hatton
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.019

9.  Antenatal care and maternal demographic and social characteristics. Evolution in France between 1972 and 1976.

Authors:  B Blondel; M Kaminski; G Breart
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies.

Authors:  K J Leveno; F G Cunningham; S Nelson; M Roark; M L Williams; D Guzick; S Dowling; C R Rosenfeld; A Buckley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increased obstetric activity: a new meaning to "induced labour"?

Authors:  S Vallgårda
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.710

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.