Literature DB >> 3455422

Is social class standardisation appropriate in occupational studies?

C Brisson1, D Loomis, N Pearce.   

Abstract

Social class standardisation has been proposed as a method for separating the effects of occupation and "social" or "lifestyle" factors in epidemiological studies, by comparing workers in a particular occupation with other workers in the same social class. The validity of this method rests upon two assumptions: (1) that social factors have the same effect in all occupational groups in the same social class, and (2) that other workers in the same social class as the workers being studied are free of occupational risk factors for the disease of interest. These assumptions will not always be satisfied. In particular, the effect of occupation will be underestimated when the comparison group also has job-related exposures which cause the disease under study. Thus, although adjustment for social class may minimise bias due to social factors, it may introduce bias due to unmeasured occupational factors. This difficulty may be magnified when occupational category is used as the measure of social class. Because of this potential bias, adjustment for social class should be done only after careful consideration of the exposures and disease involved and should be based on an appropriate definition of social class. Both crude and standardised results should be presented when such adjustments are made.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3455422      PMCID: PMC1052649          DOI: 10.1136/jech.41.4.290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  7 in total

1.  Improving occupational standardized proportionate mortality ratio analysis by social class stratification.

Authors:  S Milham
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Occupational mortality: work or way of life?

Authors:  A J Fox; A M Adelstein
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health (1978)       Date:  1978-06

3.  Indicators of social class. A comparative appraisal of measures for use in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  J H Abramson; R Gofin; J Habib; H Pridan; J Gofin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Social class, non-employment, and chronic illness: continuing the inequalities in health debate.

Authors:  S Arber
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-04-25

5.  Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men.

Authors:  R Karasek; D Baker; F Marxer; A Ahlbom; T Theorell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Occupation, social class and male cancer mortality in New Zealand, 1974-78.

Authors:  N E Pearce; J K Howard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Ischemic heart disease mortality in Iowa farmers. The influence of life-style.

Authors:  P R Pomrehn; R B Wallace; L F Burmeister
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Paternal occupational exposures and the risk of Down syndrome.

Authors:  A F Olshan; P A Baird; K Teschke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Longitudinal respiratory survey of shipyard workers: effects of trade and atopic status.

Authors:  D J Chinn; I C Stevenson; J E Cotes
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1990-02

3.  Physical diability after retirement and occupational risk factors during working life: a cross sectional epidemiological study in the Paris area.

Authors:  B Cassou; F Derriennic; Y Iwatsubo; M Amphoux
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  [The effect of education and professional position on changes in cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption: results of the MONIKA Augsberg cohort study].

Authors:  U Härtel; J Stieber; U Keil
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1993

5.  Occupational exposures estimated by means of job exposure matrices in relation to lung function in the PAARC survey.

Authors:  N Le Moual; E Orlowski; M B Schenker; M Avignon; P Brochard; F Kauffmann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Lung cancer risk among workers in the construction industry: results from two case-control studies in Montreal.

Authors:  Aude Lacourt; Javier Pintos; Jérôme Lavoué; Lesley Richardson; Jack Siemiatycki
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Occupational exposure to wood dust and risk of lung cancer in two population-based case-control studies in Montreal, Canada.

Authors:  Eric Vallières; Javier Pintos; Marie-Elise Parent; Jack Siemiatycki
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Lung cancer and occupation in a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Dario Consonni; Sara De Matteis; Jay H Lubin; Sholom Wacholder; Margaret Tucker; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Neil E Caporaso; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.