| Literature DB >> 34553263 |
M Geethu1, H Raghu Chandrashekar2, M S Divyashree3.
Abstract
Microorganisms have been contemplated as a promising source for the inexhaustible synthesis of many novel materials utilizing renewable sources. Among many of such products, polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) remains as an essential biodegradable polymer with functions similar to conventional plastics. Bacillus endophyticus is capable of accumulating biopolymer PHA in nutrient limiting conditions with excess of carbon source. Screening and optimizing the parameters for increased PHA production was done statistically. The optimized medium gave a maximum yield of 46.57% which was in well agreement with the given predicted value provided by response surface methodology model yield of 47.02%. Optimal media conditions when extrapolated in bioreactor gave an even higher production percentage of 49.9. This is the first report highlighting 49% of polyhydroxybutyrate statistically using sucrose as a source. The main highlight of the study was the use of wild type strain for producing high quality PHA using simple carbon source which can be a starting platform for using this strain for large scale PHA production industrially. FTIR and 1HNMR analysis confirmed the polymer produced.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus endophyticus; Biopolymer; Bioreactor; Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA); Shake flask cultivation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34553263 PMCID: PMC8590663 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02554-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Microbiol ISSN: 0302-8933 Impact factor: 2.552
Different levels of experimental factors selected for PHA production by Bacillus endophyticus using Plackett–Burman design
| No | Components (factors) | Low level (− 1) g/L | High level (+ 1) g/L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Na2HPO4 | 0.5 | 5 |
| 2 | KH2PO4 | 1.5 | 15 |
| 3 | (NH4)2SO4 | 1.5 | 15 |
| 4 | MgSO4·7H2O | 0.2 | 2 |
| 5 | Sucrose | 20 | 40 |
Low and high levels for 3 factors screened for PHA yield by B. endophyticus
| No | Components (factors) | Units | Low level (− 1) | High level (+ 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Na2HPO4 (g/L) | g/L | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | KH2PO4 (g/L) | g/L | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | Sucrose (g/L) | g/L | 20 | 60 |
Experimental model of Plackett–Burman design on biomass and PHA yield by B. endophyticus using sucrose as carbon source
| Run | Na2HPO4 (g/L) | KH2PO4 (g/L) | (NH4)SO4 | MgSO4·7H2O | Sucrose g/L | Biomass (g/L) | PHA (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | Experimental | Predicted | ||||||
| 1 | 5.00 | 1.50 | 15.00 | 0.2 | 20 | 2.130 | 2.21033 | 0.220 | 0.21533 |
| 2 | 5.00 | 15.00 | 1.50 | 2.0 | 20 | 3.028 | 2.98367 | 0.662 | 0.84133 |
| 3 | 0.50 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 0.2 | 40 | 2.558 | 2.31233 | 0.962 | 0.90200 |
| 4 | 5.00 | 1.50 | 15.00 | 2.0 | 20 | 2.206 | 2.06100 | 0.266 | 0.22400 |
| 5 | 5.00 | 15.00 | 1.50 | 2.0 | 40 | 3.894 | 3.83100 | 1.766 | 1.42000 |
| 6 | 5.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 0.2 | 40 | 3.900 | 4.01500 | 1.186 | 1.23800 |
| 7 | 0.50 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 2.0 | 20 | 1.200 | 1.31567 | 0.316 | 0.33200 |
| 8 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 15.00 | 2.0 | 40 | 1.126 | 1.20567 | 0.428 | 0.46667 |
| 9 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 2.0 | 40 | 1.114 | 1.17100 | 0.486 | 0.64000 |
| 10 | 5.00 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.2 | 40 | 2.966 | 3.02300 | 0.806 | 0.96733 |
| 11 | 0.50 | 15.00 | 1.50 | 0.2 | 20 | 1.308 | 1.43033 | 0.338 | 0.49667 |
| 12 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.2 | 20 | 0.602 | 0.47300 | 0.360 | 0.05267 |
| 13 | 2.75 | 8.25 | 8.25 | 1.1 | 30 | 2.858 | 2.90933 | 1.694 | 1.68267 |
| 14 | 2.75 | 8.25 | 8.25 | 1.1 | 30 | 2.940 | 2.90933 | 1.698 | 1.68267 |
| 15 | 2.75 | 8.25 | 8.25 | 1.1 | 30 | 2.930 | 2.90933 | 1.656 | 1.68267 |
Statistical analysis of Plackett–Burman design on biomass yield with five fermentative parameters
| Source | Adj SS | Adj MS | Main effect | Std. error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 6 | 14.9854 | 2.49756 | 118.35 | 0 | ||
| Linear | 5 | 13.6711 | 2.73422 | 129.57 | 0 | ||
| Na2HPO4 | 1 | 8.6972 | 8.69722 | 412.14 | 0 | 1.7027 | 0.0419 |
| KH2PO4 | 1 | 2.7495 | 2.74946 | 130.29 | 0 | 0.9573 | 0.0419 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 1 | 0.0036 | 0.00361 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 0.0347 | 0.0419 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 1 | 0.0669 | 0.0669 | 3.17 | 0.113 | − 0.1493 | 0.0419 |
| Sucrose | 1 | 2.1539 | 2.15392 | 102.07 | 0 | 0.8473 | 0.0419 |
| Curvature | 1 | 1.3142 | 1.31424 | 62.28 | 0 | ||
| Error | 8 | 0.1688 | 0.0211 | ||||
| Lack-of-fit | 6 | 0.1648 | 0.02747 | 13.73 | 0.069 | ||
| Pure error | 2 | 0.004 | 0.002 | ||||
| Total | 14 | 15.1542 |
df degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares
S = 0.14526; R = 98.89%; R(adj.) = 98.05%; F = MS(Factor) /MS(Error)
Statistical analysis of Plackett–Burman design on PHA yield with five fermentative parameters
| Source | Adj SS | Adj MS | Main effect | Std. error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 6 | 4.58603 | 0.76434 | 18.41 | 0 | ||
| Linear | 5 | 2.02502 | 0.405 | 9.75 | 0.003 | ||
| Na2HPO4 | 1 | 0.33869 | 0.33869 | 8.16 | 0.021 | 0.3360 | 0.0588 |
| KH2PO4 | 1 | 0.59141 | 0.59141 | 14.24 | 0.005 | 0.4440 | 0.0588 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 1 | 0.09013 | 0.09013 | 2.17 | 0.179 | − 0.1733 | 0.0588 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 1 | 0.00023 | 0.00023 | 0.01 | 0.943 | 0.0087 | 0.0588 |
| Sucrose | 1 | 1.00457 | 1.00457 | 24.19 | 0.001 | 0.5787 | 0.0588 |
| Curvature | 1 | 2.56101 | 2.56101 | 61.68 | 0 | ||
| Error | 8 | 0.33217 | 0.04152 | ||||
| Lack-of-fit | 6 | 0.33109 | 0.05518 | 102.7 | 0.01 | ||
| Pure error | 2 | 0.00107 | 0.00054 | ||||
| Total | 14 | 4.9182 |
Fig. 1Standardized effects on the fermentative parameters shown in Pareto chart for a biomass (g/L) and b PHA (g/L) production by B. endophyticus
Fig. 22D contour plot showing the interactive effects of three variables showing the interaction effect of Biomass g/L of B.endophyticus using sucrose as carbon source
Central composite experimental design for optimising three parameters
| Run | Na2HPO4 (g/L) | KH2PO4 (g/L) | Sucrose | Biomass (g/L) | PHA (g/L) | PHA (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coded value | Real value | Coded value | Real value | Coded value | Real value | Experimental | Predicted | Experimental | Predicted | ||
| 1 | − 1 | 1.0 | − 1 | 1.0 | − 1 | 20 | 1.73 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 31.21 |
| 2 | 1 | 2.0 | 1 | 2.0 | − 1 | 20 | 1.89 | 1.81 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 32.27 |
| 3 | 1 | 2.0 | − 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 60 | 2.59 | 2.54 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 28.57 |
| 4 | − 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 2.0 | 1 | 60 | 1.58 | 1.66 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 25.94 |
| 5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.54 | 1.64 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 35.71 |
| 6 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 34.34 |
| 7 | 1 | 2.0 | − 1 | 1.0 | − 1 | 20 | 1.91 | 1.84 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 29.30 |
| 8 | − 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 2.0 | − 1 | 20 | 1.56 | 1.61 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 19.87 |
| 9 | − 1 | 1.0 | − 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 60 | 1.95 | 2.03 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 28.71 |
| 10 | 1 | 2.0 | 1 | 2.0 | 1 | 60 | 2.36 | 2.40 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 37.28 |
| 11 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.72 | 1.68 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 46.51 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.74 | 1.68 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 31.6 |
| 13 | − 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.96 | 1.87 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 30.61 |
| 14 | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 2.58 | 2.67 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 31.39 |
| 15 | 0 | 1.5 | − 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.82 | 1.86 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 43.4 |
| 16 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.58 | 1.54 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 37.97 |
| 17 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | − 2 | 0 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.00 | − 0.02 | Nil |
| 18 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 | 80 | 1.20 | 1.12 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 22.5 |
| 19 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 39.31 |
| 20 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 40 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 39.31 |
Analysis of variance for biomass (g/L) with three factors
| Source | Adj SS | Adj MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 11 | 5.23547 | 0.47595 | 51.75 | 0 |
| Blocks | 2 | 1.02819 | 0.5141 | 55.9 | 0 |
| Linear | 3 | 1.42927 | 0.47642 | 51.8 | 0 |
| Z1 | 1 | 0.62885 | 0.62885 | 68.37 | 0 |
| Z2 | 1 | 0.09986 | 0.09986 | 10.86 | 0.011 |
| Z3 | 1 | 0.70057 | 0.70057 | 76.17 | 0 |
| Square | 3 | 2.93903 | 0.97968 | 106.52 | 0 |
| Z12 | 1 | 1.78433 | 1.78433 | 194.01 | 0 |
| Z22 | 1 | 0.4082 | 0.4082 | 44.38 | 0 |
| Z32 | 1 | 0.33607 | 0.33607 | 36.54 | 0 |
| 2-Way interaction | 3 | 0.13458 | 0.04486 | 4.88 | 0.033 |
| Z1 Z2 | 1 | 0.0098 | 0.0098 | 1.07 | 0.332 |
| Z1 Z3 | 1 | 0.10397 | 0.10397 | 11.3 | 0.01 |
| Z2 Z3 | 1 | 0.02081 | 0.02081 | 2.26 | 0.171 |
| Error | 8 | 0.07358 | 0.0092 | ||
| Lack-of-fit | 5 | 0.06691 | 0.01338 | 6.02 | 0.085 |
| Pure error | 3 | 0.00667 | 0.00222 | ||
| Total | 19 | 5.30905 |
df degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares, MS mean square
S = 0.0959016; R2 = 98.61%; R2 = 96.71%; F = MS(Factor) /MS(Error)
Analysis of variance for PHA (g/L) with three factors
| Source | Adj SS | Adj MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 11 | 0.750316 | 0.068211 | 7.95 | 0.003 |
| Blocks | 2 | 0.041597 | 0.020799 | 2.42 | 0.15 |
| Linear | 3 | 0.216226 | 0.072075 | 8.4 | 0.007 |
| Z1 | 1 | 0.119025 | 0.119025 | 13.87 | 0.006 |
| Z2 | 1 | 0.021025 | 0.021025 | 2.45 | 0.156 |
| Z3 | 1 | 0.076176 | 0.076176 | 8.88 | 0.018 |
| Square | 3 | 0.431045 | 0.143682 | 16.74 | 0.001 |
| Z12 | 1 | 0.056745 | 0.056745 | 6.61 | 0.033 |
| Z22 | 1 | 0.050508 | 0.050508 | 5.89 | 0.041 |
| Z32 | 1 | 0.21603 | 0.21603 | 25.17 | 0.001 |
| 2-Way interaction | 3 | 0.057634 | 0.019211 | 2.24 | 0.161 |
| Z1 Z2 | 1 | 0.041472 | 0.041472 | 4.83 | 0.059 |
| Z1 Z3 | 1 | 0.0128 | 0.0128 | 1.49 | 0.257 |
| Z2 Z3 | 1 | 0.003362 | 0.003362 | 0.39 | 0.549 |
| Error | 8 | 0.068657 | 0.008582 | ||
| Lack-of-fit | 5 | 0.039085 | 0.007817 | 0.79 | 0.618 |
| Pure error | 3 | 0.029572 | 0.009857 | ||
| Total | 19 | 0.818973 |
df degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares, MS mean square
S = 0.0926396; R2 = 91.62%; R(adj) = 80.09%; F = MS(Factor) /MS(Error)
Fig. 32D contour plot showing the interactive effects of three variables and on PHA production by B.endophyticus using sucrose as carbon source
Fig. 4Growth of B. endophyticus with 1 L optimal production media in a 3 L bioreactor PHA
Fig. 5FTIR spectra of a standard PHB and b PHA extracted from B. endophyticus using 4
Fig. 61H NMR spectra of PHA extracted from B. endophyticus using 4% sucrose as carbon source