Literature DB >> 34552005

International consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

James Simeon Bowness1,2, Amit Pawa3, Lloyd Turbitt4, Boyne Bellew5,6, Nigel Bedforth7, David Burckett-St Laurent8, Alain Delbos9, Nabil Elkassabany10, Jenny Ferry2, Ben Fox11, James L H French7, Calum Grant12, Ashwani Gupta13, William Harrop-Griffiths5, Nat Haslam14, Helen Higham15,16, Rosemary Hogg4, David F Johnston4, Rachel Joyce Kearns17,18, Sandra Kopp19, Clara Lobo20, Sonya McKinlay17,18, Stavros Memtsoudis21,22, Peter Merjavy23, Eleni Moka24, Madan Narayanan25, Samer Narouze26, J Alison Noble27, David Phillips2, Meg Rosenblatt28, Amy Sadler12, Maria Paz Sebastian29, Alasdair Taylor12, Athmaja Thottungal30, Luis Fernando Valdés-Vilches31, Thomas Volk32, Simeon West33, Morné Wolmarans34, Jonathan Womack35, Alan James Robert Macfarlane17,36.   

Abstract

There is no universally agreed set of anatomical structures that must be identified on ultrasound for the performance of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) techniques. This study aimed to produce standardized recommendations for core (minimum) structures to identify during seven basic blocks. An international consensus was sought through a modified Delphi process. A long-list of anatomical structures was refined through serial review by key opinion leaders in UGRA. All rounds were conducted remotely and anonymously to facilitate equal contribution of each participant. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for "orientation scanning" (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for the "block view" (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). Strong recommendations for inclusion were made if ≥75% of participants rated a structure as "definitely include" in any round. Weak recommendations were made if >50% of participants rated a structure as "definitely include" or "probably include" for all rounds (but the criterion for "strong recommendation" was never met). Thirty-six participants (94.7%) completed all rounds. 128 structures were reviewed; a "strong recommendation" is made for 35 structures on orientation scanning and 28 for the block view. A "weak recommendation" is made for 36 and 20 structures, respectively. This study provides recommendations on the core (minimum) set of anatomical structures to identify during ultrasound scanning for seven basic blocks in UGRA. They are intended to support consistent practice, empower non-experts using basic UGRA techniques, and standardize teaching and research. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lower extremity; pain management; regional anesthesia; ultrasonography; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34552005     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  1 in total

1.  Regional anaesthesia research - where to now?

Authors:  Rachel J Kearns; Jonathan Womack; Alan Jr Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2022-04-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.