| Literature DB >> 34551714 |
Harikrishnan A S Nair1,2,3, Sujatha Subramoni1, Wee Han Poh1, Nabilah Taqiah Binte Hasnuddin1, Martin Tay1,4, Michael Givskov1,5, Tim Tolker-Nielsen5, Staffan Kjelleberg1,6, Diane McDougald7,8, Scott A Rice9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biofilms disperse in response to specific environmental cues, such as reduced oxygen concentration, changes in nutrient concentration and exposure to nitric oxide. Interestingly, biofilms do not completely disperse under these conditions, which is generally attributed to physiological heterogeneity of the biofilm. However, our results suggest that genetic heterogeneity also plays an important role in the non-dispersing population of P. aeruginosa in biofilms after nutrient starvation.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilm development; Bioreporter; C-di-GMP; Dispersal; Image-based quantification; Morphotypic variants; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Starvation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34551714 PMCID: PMC8459498 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02318-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Characterisation of P. aeruginosa biofilms during starvation. The biofilm was stained for viability with the BacLight™ Live-Dead® reagents, and the biovolume was calculated as average of 3 independent experiments from CLSM images using the Imaris software package. For each experiment 15 CLSM images were taken. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). Asterisks indicate values were significantly different between samples (Two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post-test; **** < P 0.0001)
Fig. 2Orthogonal view of P. aeruginosa microcolonies before and after starvation. A) biofilm before starvation B) colonies after 72 h of starvation. P. aeruginosa contained the c-di-GMP responsive reporter construct as described [39]. Orthogonal view showing top panel x-z plane, right y-z and middle corresponding x-y plane. Magnification 20x. Scalebar: 50 μm (A) or 20 μm (B)
Fig. 3Colony variants of P. aeruginosa during biofilm starvation. Effluent from biofilms pre- and post- starvation was serially diluted and plated onto LB agar for enumeration. For each time point, the biomass was also harvested from the flow cells, serially diluted and plated onto LB agar to ennumerate morphotypic variants. Independent flow-cells were run for each time point for control (A) and starved (B) conditions
Identification of genetic differences between the P. aeruginosa wild type and non-dispersing isolates
Fig. 4C-di-GMP levels of colonies that fail to disperse upon starvation measured using the cdrA::gfp reporter. Individual isolates were grown in M9 glucose medium overnight and 2 ml of culture was transferred to a 24 well plate in triplicate. GFP fluorescence and OD were measured using a Tecan plate reader. RFUs were calculated as GFP/OD600. Each data point is the average of three technical replicates
Fig. 5Starvation of variants. Biofilm starvation dispersal response of isolates collected after 4 d of biofilm starvation. Representative morphotypic isolates were grown in flow cells and starvation was induced at day 4. Biomass biovolumes were calculated as average of 3 independent experiments by CLSM images using IMARIS software. For each experiment 5 CLSM images were taken. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). Asterisks indicate that the values are significantly different (Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test; *** < P 0.001, ** < P 0.01, * < P 0.05)
Fig. 6Complementation of non-dispersal phenotype of RSCV1 mutant under starvation conditions. Batch biofilms of WT, RSCV1, RSCV1/pBBR and RSCV1/pBBRwspF were cultivated for 6 h and starved. Biofilm biomass was quantified by crystal violet staining at different time points. Percentage biofilm changes were plotted against time and the rate of change of biofilm reduction was obtained through linear regression. Data shown are average values ± SD from 3 independent experiments. M9G-M9 medium containing glucose; M9S-M9 salts without carbon source. Asterisks indicate that the values are significantly different between strains (One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test; * < P 0.05)