Residual blood flow distal to an arterial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with favorable patient outcome. Both collateral flow and thrombus permeability may contribute to such residual flow. We propose a method for discriminating between these two mechanisms, based on determining the direction of flow in multiple branches distal to the occluding thrombus using dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography (dynamic CTA). We analyzed dynamic CTA data of 30 AIS patients and present patient-specific cases that identify typical blood flow patterns and velocities. We distinguished patterns with anterograde (N = 10), retrograde (N = 9), and both flow directions (N = 11), with a large variability in velocities for each flow pattern. The observed flow patterns reflect the interplay between permeability and collaterals. The presented method characterizes distal flow and provides a tool to study patient-specific distal tissue perfusion.
Residual blood flow distal to an arterial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with favorable patient outcome. Both collateral flow and thrombus permeability may contribute to such residual flow. We propose a method for discriminating between these two mechanisms, based on determining the direction of flow in multiple branches distal to the occluding thrombus using dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography (dynamic CTA). We analyzed dynamic CTA data of 30 AIS patients and present patient-specific cases that identify typical blood flow patterns and velocities. We distinguished patterns with anterograde (N = 10), retrograde (N = 9), and both flow directions (N = 11), with a large variability in velocities for each flow pattern. The observed flow patterns reflect the interplay between permeability and collaterals. The presented method characterizes distal flow and provides a tool to study patient-specific distal tissue perfusion.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) occurs when a thrombus occludes an intracranial
artery, severely restricting perfusion to brain tissue. The lack of blood
supply leads to a rapidly growing oxygen debt, which can lead to
irreversible neurological damage.Despite the occlusion, blood may still flow in the arteries downstream of the
thrombus. After stroke onset, the presence of distal flow depends on two
factors: the permeability of the thrombus and the capacity of the cerebral
collateral circulation. Evidence of thrombus permeability has been found in
preclinical studies[1-3] and clinical imaging studies.[4-6]
Thrombus permeability has been associated with favorable patient outcome and
higher intravenous thrombolysis treatment success.[4-6] The cerebral
collateral circulation is a subsidiary vascular network that allows some
remaining blood flow in case of an occlusion.[7-10] Previous
experimental research on rodents has presented the formation of collaterals
after stroke onset, which influenced lesion volume and survival.[11,12]
Increased collateral flow has been related to favorable patient
outcome.[13-16]The level of remaining tissue perfusion (either due to permeability or
collateral flow) is a major determinant of stroke outcome.[17,18]
The perfusion level discriminates between infarct, penumbra, and oligemic tissue.
More remaining perfusion can sustain tissue at risk for a longer
time, making intravenous or endovascular treatment a beneficial option for a
longer time window. Still, the combined role of permeability and collaterals
in distal perfusion is understudied.Flow direction can reveal the source of distal tissue perfusion. Anterograde
flow through the occlusion and downstream segments has been associated to
permeable thrombi, while retrograde flow distal to the thrombus has been
related to collateral flow coming from neighboring arterial
branches.[20,21] Flow direction
has previously been assessed on dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography
(dynamic CTA) data of AIS patients by manually placing markers on a single
arterial segment immediately distal to the occlusion.[21,22]
However, this method neglects flow patterns in other distal branches and
might therefore not completely characterize blood flow downstream of the
thrombus. Important information on the interplay of thrombus permeability
induced flow and collateral flow might be disregarded. Careful analysis of
flow source is needed to better understand perfusion after stroke onset.The aim of this study is to elucidate mechanisms of intracranial blood flow
distal to the thrombus in AIS patients. We present a semi-automated method
to characterize the direction and extent of blood flow in multiple branches
distal to the thrombus using dynamic CTA data of AIS patients. We study
patient-specific cases that portrayed typical flow patterns distal to the
occlusion.
Methods
Data sets
We analyzed good quality thin-slice dynamic CTA data of 30 AIS patients
who had a single occlusion in the middle cerebral artery (MCA). These
patients were presented in our hospital between November 2017 and
December 2018. The dynamic CTA data were acquired using a Siemens
Somatom Force scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Forcheim, Germany) with a
peak voltage of 70 kV and Hr36f convolutional kernel or a Siemens
Somatom Definition AS scanners with a peak voltage of 80 kV and H20f
convolutional kernel. The dynamic CTA scans were source images of CT
perfusion (CTP) data, acquired in a routine clinical setting. Typical
size of dynamic CTA images is
·
(sagittal, coronal, axial, respectively), which were
acquired at 30 different time points. Typical resolution of the data
is
.
Ethics
This study was conducted using observational data of patients from our
hospital included in a prospective national multicenter registry (MR
CLEAN Registry).
This registry was approved by the Erasmus University Medical
Center Central Ethics Committee, which served as the central review
board for all participating centers. The requirement for written
informed consent was waived, but all patients or legal representatives
were provided with information on the registry orally and in writing,
and had the opportunity to withdraw consent to use their data via an
opt-out form, conforming to the European Union General Data Protection
Regulation. The registry procedures followed were all in accordance
with the Declaration of Helsinki, as amended by the World Medical
Association General Assembly in October 2008.
Vessel segmentation
In order to quantify blood (contrast) flow direction distal to the
occluded MCA, we developed a pipeline to determine the vessel
centerlines. We pre-processed each image set by first stripping the
skull and registering every timeframe to the first timeframe using
Elastix’ rigid registration.
The data were filtered using a bilateral filter.
For each data set, we computed a temporal maximum intensity
projection (t-MIP) (Figure 1(a)). From this t-MIP, we segmented all vessels
of the anterior circulation using a U-NET model provided by Nico.lab,
similar to a previous study
(Figure
1(b)). We subsequently defined a region of interest (ROI)
that contained the downstream territory of the occluded MCA segment
using ITK-snap
(Figure
1(c)). We skeletonized the vessels of interest by
iterative morphological thinning of a binarized image, while ensuring
connectivity and geometry (Python’s skeleton library). The skeletons
of the vessels correspond to the vessel centerlines (Figure
1(d)).
Figure 1.
Illustration of the pre-processing steps: (a) creation of the
temporal maximum intensity projection, (b) segmentation of
the intracranial vessels, (c) definition of the region of
interest (ROI) that encapsulates the occlusion, and (d)
skeletonizing of the defined ROI.
Illustration of the pre-processing steps: (a) creation of the
temporal maximum intensity projection, (b) segmentation of
the intracranial vessels, (c) definition of the region of
interest (ROI) that encapsulates the occlusion, and (d)
skeletonizing of the defined ROI.
Vessel selection
We developed a graphical user interface (GUI) using JavaScript to assist
the computation of the flow direction in multiple branches distal to
the occlusion. This GUI allows the selection of the arterial branches
of interest and the placement of reference markers indicating the
proximal branch, thrombus branch, and distal branches. In case of a
bifurcating thrombus, the branch with a longer thrombus was selected.
The complete path along the artery centerline was subsequently
computed based on the placed reference markers. These paths were
determined using a path-finding algorithm that computes the
minimum-cost path based on the intensities in the t-MIP: high
intensities yield a low cost; low intensities yield a high cost. An
example of the extracted paths can be found in (Figure 2(a) and (b)).
Figure 2.
(a) Maximum intensity projection of a dynamic CTA scan with a
left middle cerebral artery occlusion. (b) Example of
vessel centerlines. The vascular paths proximal to the
thrombus, within the thrombus, and distal to the thrombus
are colored in red, green, and blue, respectively. (c)
Typical raw time attenuation curves (TAC) of contrast
intensity [HU]. Each TAC corresponds to the dynamic
attenuation within a single voxel. Colors as in (b), with
two distal paths.
(a) Maximum intensity projection of a dynamic CTA scan with a
left middle cerebral artery occlusion. (b) Example of
vessel centerlines. The vascular paths proximal to the
thrombus, within the thrombus, and distal to the thrombus
are colored in red, green, and blue, respectively. (c)
Typical raw time attenuation curves (TAC) of contrast
intensity [HU]. Each TAC corresponds to the dynamic
attenuation within a single voxel. Colors as in (b), with
two distal paths.The manual selection of the arterial branches was performed by multiple
trained observers, cognizant of the occlusion location reported by the
attending neuroradiologist. These selections were discussed a
posteriori and adjusted if necessary to capture the optimal
topology.
Blood flow direction
For each voxel along the centerline of the branches of interest, the
contrast intensity over time was determined and displayed as time
attenuation curves (TACs) (Figure 2(c)). These raw TACs
were interpolated and filtered using a Butterworth low-pass filter to
remove high-frequency noise in time.The arrival time of contrast differed per voxel. The difference in
arrival time between locations (time delay) was computed using a
cross-correlation between the TACs of each marker and the most
proximally located marker. We discarded TACs with a maximum intensity
less than 5% of the maximum intensity of the most proximal TAC.To determine the direction of the flow, the computed time delay was
analyzed as a function of the distance from the most proximal marker.
If the time delay increased with the distance along the vessel,
the contrast was assumed to be moving distal, reflecting anterograde
flow. Conversely, if the time delay decreased with the distance, the
contrast was considered to be moving towards the thrombus, reflecting
retrograde flow.
Blood velocity
The blood velocity along the distal branches was estimated by fitting a
linear regression along the time delay over distance. The inverse of
the slope corresponds with the average velocity. If the distal
branches had bifurcations, a linear regression was fitted to each
segment.
Results
Baseline characteristics of the 30 patients can be found in Supplementary
Material, Appendix A. We found a large variety of vessel topologies distal
to the occlusion, which included vessel bifurcations and trifurcations. To
facilitate the analysis of these distal branches, we distinguished between
mother and daughter segments (see Supplemental Material, Appendix B, Figure 1). Based on
the downstream flow directions of the daughter segments, we grouped the
patients (see Supplementary Material, Appendix B):Pattern I: anterograde distal flow (N = 10/30 patients).Pattern II: retrograde distal flow (N = 9/30 patients).Pattern III: both anterograde and retrograde distal flow
(N = 11/30 patients).A summary of the blood flow patterns for all 30 patients can be found in
Supplementary Material, Appendix B. Below we present four patient-specific
cases that illustrate these distal flow patterns.
Pattern I: Anterograde distal flow
Patient I-a and I-b showed anterograde flow proximal to, within and
distal to the occlusion. One distal branch was identified for patient
I-a, while two branches were identified for patient I-b. Patient I-a
presented larger time delays and larger spreading of the distal TACs
compared to patient I-b. The anterograde distal flow velocity of
patient I-a was much lower than that of patient I-b, with average
velocities of 5 mm/s vs. 100 mm/s and 33 mm/s, respectively (Figures 3 and
4).
Figure 3.
Patient I-a: slow anterograde flow. (a) Maximum intensity
projection of the dynamic CTA scan of patient I-a with a
right middle cerebral artery occlusion. Vessel segments
proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus, and distal
to the thrombus are colored in red, green, and blue,
respectively. (b) Time attenuation curves (TACs) along the
vessel segments, colored as in (a). The Y axis scale
denotes the position of the voxel from where the TACs were
extracted. (c) Time delay [s] as a function of the
distance [mm]. The results of the cross-correlation (dots)
are fitted with a linear regression for the distal branch
(blue line). The positive slope indicates anterograde flow
and its inverse corresponds to the average blood velocity:
5 mm/s.
Figure 4.
Patient I-b: fast anterograde flow. (a) Maximum intensity
projection of the dynamic CTA scan of patient I-b with a
left middle cerebral artery occlusion. Vessel segments
proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus, and distal
to the thrombus are colored in red, green, and (light and
dark) blue, respectively. (b) Time attenuation curves
(TACs) along the vessel segments, colored as in (a). The Y
axis scale denotes the position of the voxel from where
the TACs were extracted. (c) Time delay [s] as a function
of the distance [mm]. The results of the cross-correlation
(dots) are fitted with a linear regression for each distal
branch. The positive slope indicates anterograde flow and
its inverse gives an estimation of the average blood
velocity. Distal to the thrombus and up to the bifurcation
(vertical line), the time delay is zero (meaning that
contrast appearance could not be detected due to the
limited time resolution of the data). Further distally,
flow is anterograde and the velocities are 100 mm/s and
33 mm/s for distal1 and distal2 (dark and light blue
lines), respectively.
Patient I-a: slow anterograde flow. (a) Maximum intensity
projection of the dynamic CTA scan of patient I-a with a
right middle cerebral artery occlusion. Vessel segments
proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus, and distal
to the thrombus are colored in red, green, and blue,
respectively. (b) Time attenuation curves (TACs) along the
vessel segments, colored as in (a). The Y axis scale
denotes the position of the voxel from where the TACs were
extracted. (c) Time delay [s] as a function of the
distance [mm]. The results of the cross-correlation (dots)
are fitted with a linear regression for the distal branch
(blue line). The positive slope indicates anterograde flow
and its inverse corresponds to the average blood velocity:
5 mm/s.Patient I-b: fast anterograde flow. (a) Maximum intensity
projection of the dynamic CTA scan of patient I-b with a
left middle cerebral artery occlusion. Vessel segments
proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus, and distal
to the thrombus are colored in red, green, and (light and
dark) blue, respectively. (b) Time attenuation curves
(TACs) along the vessel segments, colored as in (a). The Y
axis scale denotes the position of the voxel from where
the TACs were extracted. (c) Time delay [s] as a function
of the distance [mm]. The results of the cross-correlation
(dots) are fitted with a linear regression for each distal
branch. The positive slope indicates anterograde flow and
its inverse gives an estimation of the average blood
velocity. Distal to the thrombus and up to the bifurcation
(vertical line), the time delay is zero (meaning that
contrast appearance could not be detected due to the
limited time resolution of the data). Further distally,
flow is anterograde and the velocities are 100 mm/s and
33 mm/s for distal1 and distal2 (dark and light blue
lines), respectively.
Pattern II: Retrograde distal flow
For patient II-a, flow direction proximal to, within and immediately
distal to the occlusion was anterograde. However, further distal,
after the vessel bifurcation, retrograde flow was observed. Retrograde
flow close to the cortical territory was fast, and it slowed down near
the vessel bifurcation. Anterograde flow and retrograde flow merged at
the vessel bifurcation. In-thrombus TACs were more dispersed and had
lower intensities than proximal TACs. Distal TACs showed a similar
behavior as thrombus TACs in the case of anterograde flow. Distal TACs
were less dispersed and had higher intensities than thrombus TACs when
retrograde flow was found. Distal to the bifurcation, the velocities
were −14 mm/s and −3 mm/s for the distal arteries (Figure
5).
Figure 5.
Patient II-a: retrograde flow. (a) Maximum intensity
projection of the dynamic CTA scan of patient II-a with a
left middle cerebral artery occlusion. Vessel segments
proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus and distal
to the thrombus in red, green, and (light and dark) blue,
respectively. (b) Time attenuation curves (TACs) along the
vessel segments, colored as in (a). The Y axis scale
denotes the position of the voxel from where the TACs were
extracted. (c) Time delay [s] as a function of the
distance [mm]. The positive and negative slopes indicate
anterograde and retrograde flow, respectively. Up to the
vessel bifurcation (vertical line), flow in anterograde.
Distal to the bifurcation, flow is retrograde and the
velocities are −14 mm/s and −3 mm/s for distal1 and
distal2 (dark and light blue lines), respectively.
Patient II-a: retrograde flow. (a) Maximum intensity
projection of the dynamic CTA scan of patient II-a with a
left middle cerebral artery occlusion. Vessel segments
proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus and distal
to the thrombus in red, green, and (light and dark) blue,
respectively. (b) Time attenuation curves (TACs) along the
vessel segments, colored as in (a). The Y axis scale
denotes the position of the voxel from where the TACs were
extracted. (c) Time delay [s] as a function of the
distance [mm]. The positive and negative slopes indicate
anterograde and retrograde flow, respectively. Up to the
vessel bifurcation (vertical line), flow in anterograde.
Distal to the bifurcation, flow is retrograde and the
velocities are −14 mm/s and −3 mm/s for distal1 and
distal2 (dark and light blue lines), respectively.
Pattern III: Both anterograde and retrograde distal flow
Patient III-a showed anterograde flow proximal to, within and immediately
distal to the occlusion. Further distal, after the vessel
trifurcation, flow was retrograde in two branches and anterograde in
one branch. TACs of the anterograde branch were more dispersed and had
lower intensities than TACs of the retrograde branch. Retrograde flow
was faster than anterograde flow. The average velocities were
−33 mm/s, −20 mm/s, and 9 mm/s (Figure 6).
Figure 6.
Patient III-a: both anterograde and retrograde flow. (a)
Maximum intensity projection of the dynamic CTA scan of
patient III-a with a left middle cerebral artery
occlusion. The vessel segment proximal to the thrombus is
colored in red, within the thrombus in green, and distal
to the thrombus in (light and dark) blue and magenta. (b)
Time attenuation curves (TACs) along the vessel segments,
colored as in (a). The Y axis scale denotes the position
of the voxel from where the TACs were extracted. (c) Time
delays [s] as a function of the distance [mm]. The
positive and negative slopes indicate anterograde and
retrograde flow, respectively. Distal to the thrombus and
up to the vessel trifurcation (vertical line), the time
delay is zero (meaning that contrast appearance could not
be detected due to the limited time resolution of the
data). Further distally, the average velocities are
−33 mm/s, −20 mm/s, and 9 mm/s for distal1, distal2, and
distal3 (dark blue, light blue, and magenta lines),
respectively.
Patient III-a: both anterograde and retrograde flow. (a)
Maximum intensity projection of the dynamic CTA scan of
patient III-a with a left middle cerebral artery
occlusion. The vessel segment proximal to the thrombus is
colored in red, within the thrombus in green, and distal
to the thrombus in (light and dark) blue and magenta. (b)
Time attenuation curves (TACs) along the vessel segments,
colored as in (a). The Y axis scale denotes the position
of the voxel from where the TACs were extracted. (c) Time
delays [s] as a function of the distance [mm]. The
positive and negative slopes indicate anterograde and
retrograde flow, respectively. Distal to the thrombus and
up to the vessel trifurcation (vertical line), the time
delay is zero (meaning that contrast appearance could not
be detected due to the limited time resolution of the
data). Further distally, the average velocities are
−33 mm/s, −20 mm/s, and 9 mm/s for distal1, distal2, and
distal3 (dark blue, light blue, and magenta lines),
respectively.
Discussion
In this study we presented a method to characterize blood flow in multiple
branches distal to a middle cerebral artery occlusion and we have
illustrated that these flow patterns vary greatly in patients with an AIS.
We have identified flow patterns with anterograde flow, retrograde flow, and
both flow directions.Recent studies on rodent stroke models have also reported findings of
retrograde flow coming from collaterals[11,12,29,30] and flow patterns
with both anterograde and retrograde flow distal to the occlusion.
Other studies have visually assessed blood flow direction on dynamic
CTA data of AIS patients.[20,32] Visual inspection
of flow is mostly limited to the distinction of patients with predominant
anterograde or retrograde flow and hinders the identification of more
complex blood flow patterns. Flow direction has previously been quantified
in a single arterial branch, where flow patterns were dichotomized into
anterograde and retrograde flow.
Measuring flow in a single arterial segment immediately distal to the
occlusion leads to an oversimplification of the flow patterns. As shown in
the cases of retrograde and both flow directions (pattern II and III), only
considering a short segment distal to the occlusion can neglect the
retrograde collateral flow, and therefore, assume that tissue further
distally from the occlusion is not perfused (fast enough). To better
understand and quantify tissue perfusion after stroke onset, flow patterns
in multiple branches up to the cortex should be studied and quantified.The presented variation in blood flow patterns manifests the different
interplays between the permeability of the thrombus and the performance of
collaterals. The flow provided by each of these mechanisms is delimited by
the mechanism itself: the physical properties of the thrombus define the
permeability, and the inherent collateral angioarchitecture of the patient
is a delimiting factor of the maximum collateral performance.[33,34]
At the same time, the flow resulting from these mechanisms depends on the
performance of the other: thrombus permeability affects the pressure distal
to the occlusion, which is driving the collateral flow, and vice versa. For
clarity, we present flow scenarios depending on the balance of collaterals
and permeability in Figure
7, and its relation to the found flow patterns:
Figure 7. (a) Schematic drawings of the internal carotid artery
(ICA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery
(MCA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA), anterior communicating
artery (Acom), posterior communicating artery (Pcom), collateral
circulation and penetrating arteries (penetrators). The
schematic drawing is an oversimplification of the real
anatomical structures. The MCA bifurcation does not merely
represent the M1-M2 bifurcation, but rather any vessel
bifurcation distal to the occlusion. The major leptomeningeal
collaterals are in reality end-to-end anastomoses. (b) Figure
legend. Flow direction is indicated by the direction of the
arrow. Flows proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus, and
distal to the thrombus are colored in red, green, and blue,
respectively. Blood flow through neighboring arteries (ICA, ACA,
PCA, Pcom, and Acom) is colored in orange. We distinguish
between (quasi-)normal, reduced, and limited blood flow, and
between (quasi-)normal, reduced, and limited tissue perfusion.
In both cases, normal > reduced > limited. Perfusion
coming from the MCA is denoted in blue. Perfusion coming from
the neighboring ACA and PCA is denoted in orange. Thrombi are
classified into permeable and non/less permeable thrombi. (c)
Non/less permeable thrombus with no collaterals. The absence of
collaterals is due to a poor collateral angioarchitecture or
poor collateral performance. The perfusion of the MCA territory
is only dependent on the limited residual anterograde flow
coming from the thrombus. (d) Permeable thrombus with no
collaterals. The absence of collaterals is due to a poor
collateral angioarchitecture or poor collateral performance.
Tissue perfusion of the MCA territory relies on the residual
anterograde flow coming from the thrombus. (e) Non/less
permeable thrombus with collaterals. Tissue perfusion of the MCA
territory is mainly dependent on the collateral flow coming from
the ACA and PCA. The limited flow coming from the thrombus may
also contribute to tissue perfusion. This situation allows flow
patterns with both anterograde and retrograde flow. (f)
Permeable thrombus with collaterals. The perfusion of the MCA
territory relies on both the residual anterograde flow coming
from the thrombus and the collateral flow coming from the ACA
and PCA.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic drawings of the internal carotid artery
(ICA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery
(MCA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA), anterior communicating
artery (Acom), posterior communicating artery (Pcom), collateral
circulation and penetrating arteries (penetrators). The
schematic drawing is an oversimplification of the real
anatomical structures. The MCA bifurcation does not merely
represent the M1-M2 bifurcation, but rather any vessel
bifurcation distal to the occlusion. The major leptomeningeal
collaterals are in reality end-to-end anastomoses. (b) Figure
legend. Flow direction is indicated by the direction of the
arrow. Flows proximal to the thrombus, within the thrombus, and
distal to the thrombus are colored in red, green, and blue,
respectively. Blood flow through neighboring arteries (ICA, ACA,
PCA, Pcom, and Acom) is colored in orange. We distinguish
between (quasi-)normal, reduced, and limited blood flow, and
between (quasi-)normal, reduced, and limited tissue perfusion.
In both cases, normal > reduced > limited. Perfusion
coming from the MCA is denoted in blue. Perfusion coming from
the neighboring ACA and PCA is denoted in orange. Thrombi are
classified into permeable and non/less permeable thrombi. (c)
Non/less permeable thrombus with no collaterals. The absence of
collaterals is due to a poor collateral angioarchitecture or
poor collateral performance. The perfusion of the MCA territory
is only dependent on the limited residual anterograde flow
coming from the thrombus. (d) Permeable thrombus with no
collaterals. The absence of collaterals is due to a poor
collateral angioarchitecture or poor collateral performance.
Tissue perfusion of the MCA territory relies on the residual
anterograde flow coming from the thrombus. (e) Non/less
permeable thrombus with collaterals. Tissue perfusion of the MCA
territory is mainly dependent on the collateral flow coming from
the ACA and PCA. The limited flow coming from the thrombus may
also contribute to tissue perfusion. This situation allows flow
patterns with both anterograde and retrograde flow. (f)
Permeable thrombus with collaterals. The perfusion of the MCA
territory relies on both the residual anterograde flow coming
from the thrombus and the collateral flow coming from the ACA
and PCA.Pattern I. Exclusive anterograde flow indicates cases where distal
perfusion primarily depends on the permeability of the thrombus.
Fast anterograde flow is related with a permeable thrombus (or
incomplete occlusion by the thrombus) that allows residual flow
(Figure
7(d) and (f)). Slow anterograde flow is due to a
less permeable thrombus (Figure 7(c)).
Collaterals can or cannot contribute to the distal anterograde
flow. The lack of collateral flow indicates that either due to
the (high) thrombus permeability the pressure drop is not large
enough to drive flow retrogradely towards the occlusion, or the
extent of the collateral circulation is not sufficient to
provide blood to the target downstream territory.Pattern II. The presence of retrograde flow downstream of the
occlusion is due to the performance of the collateral
circulation (Figure 7(e)). In this case, the thrombus may still
allow residual anterograde flow through the occlusion. The
created pressure gradient drives collateral flow retrogradely
towards the thrombus. This type of patient might be similar to a
patient with exclusive slow anterograde flow (Figure
7(c)) but a good collateral architecture (Figure
7(e)).Pattern III. The presence of both anterograde and retrograde flow
is due to the combined effect of permeability and collaterals,
or a consequence of collateral flow going retrogradely and then
anterogradely through a side branch (Figure 7(e)).We reported flow velocities in the range of 1–100 mm/s distal to the occlusion.
Flow velocity differences between branches may occur due to the flow
division at nodes as well as differences in vascular diameter (since flow
equals velocity times cross-sectional area). There is a paucity of data on
variations in flow velocity between branches under normal (or minimally
interrupted) conditions. Distal to an occlusion, the range of 1–100 mm/s
seems possible, given that under normal conditions, blood velocity in the
MCA has been reported to be 400–600 mm/s.In the context of personalized medicine, having access to a method to quantify
patient-specific blood flow characteristics opens the possibility to better
understand and determine distal tissue perfusion. It is expected that distal
perfusion moderates the pace of infarct progression.
For the same time point after stroke onset, a patient with a good
collateral system feeding the hypoxic brain territory might have a smaller
infarct core and larger penumbra than a patient with poor
collaterals.[14,16,18,19,37,38] A permeable
thrombus may allow residual anterograde flow downstream of the occlusion. A
patient with anterograde flow through the thrombus might benefit from
thrombolysis even after the recommended treatment window.Thrombus permeability is influenced by many parameters such as thrombus length,
void fraction and/or histology.[22,39-41] The permeability
of the thrombus affects the pressure drop over the occluded vessel, and this
pressure drop determines the direction of the flow distally. A highly
impermeable thrombus can cause a large pressure drop over the occlusion,
which can drive retrograde, collateral-related flow towards the thrombus.
This pressure drop is partly influenced by the mean arterial pressure of the
patient. Increased arterial pressure has also been related to increased
collateral flow.[42,43] For a given collateral network and thrombus
permeability, we could expect that both collateral flow and thrombus flow
increase to a similar extent at higher central blood pressures, without a
fundamental change in the flow patterns.Future research could focus on the association of dynamic CTA-based flow
measurements with CTP perfusion analyses. CTP provides information on
perfusion level of the affected brain hemisphere, but it does not provide
any information on the source of this perfusion. The combination of both
flow direction and perfusion measurements may contribute to the
understanding of perfusion mechanism after stroke onset.
Limitations
This study has some limitations. The temporal resolution of the dynamic CTA
scans was 2 s. This leads to around a 1 s error in the
cross-correlation-based time delay estimate. We could therefore not resolve
the time differences in vessel segments with fast flow. The computation of
the velocity was based on a linear fit of the data, which is an
oversimplification of the observed complex local velocities. However, it
does illustrate the observed variability (e.g. the velocity difference
observed in patient I-a vs. patient I-b). Contrast flow can be affected by
patient factors such as the anatomy of the Circle of Willis, the presence of
proximal stenosis in the carotids, or the cardiac output. In-thrombus TACs
were often disperse, which could affect the computed time delay.We analyzed flow velocity and direction in a few major branches distal to the
thrombus. As a general rule, the branches were followed up to the cortex,
but this was not always feasible. The observed flow patterns are far from
trivial. Clearly, there are many side branches and further bifurcations
distal to the identified “daughter segments” that affect the flow patterns.
An apparent violation of flow conservation in our analyzed branches,
therefore, can be caused by small side branches that were not included by
the observer or lost in the segmentation process.The validation of the method and measurements using, for example, other imaging
modalities is difficult. To some extent, flow direction can be judged in
digital subtraction angiography (DSA). However, a quantitative and
per-branch flow analysis on DSA seems not feasible, considering the 2 D
nature of such imaging. On the other hand, CTP data provides information on
the level but not on the source of tissue perfusion, and thereby is
difficult to link to the flow directions in the proximal segments. In
addition, the translation from perfusion to velocity requires assumptions on
among others perfusion territory and diameter of the analyzed segments.
Therefore, the presented method should be considered a proof of concept
showing the complexity and variability of flow patterns distal to the
thrombus rather than a validated flow assessment methodology.The anterograde in-thrombus flows found in this study represent the ability of
nanometer-sized contrast to pass through the thrombus, and not that of whole
blood, containing the micrometer-sized red blood cells (RBC) that provide
tissue oxygenation. We could not establish whether the permeable thrombi
allowed the RBC to pass. Nevertheless, the presence of anterograde
in-thrombus flow might still be beneficial for thrombolysis.The use of this method in large clinical trials requires automated thrombus
detection and branch selection in order to save analysis time and observer
dependency.Finally, the current study did not include enough patients to statistically
address (clinical) differences between the presented flow patterns, such as
differences in Alberta stroke programme early CT score (ASPECTS) or baseline
National Institute of Health Stroke scale (NIHSS), which may have some
influence of intracranial flow patterns.
Conclusion
We have shown that there is a large variety of flow patterns distal to the
occluding thrombus in patients with an acute ischemic stroke. We have
identified anterograde and retrograde flow patterns in multiple middle
cerebral artery branches distal to the occlusion. This characterization can
help understanding the different roles of thrombus permeability and
collateral circulation and opens the possibility to study patient-specific
distal tissue perfusion.
Authors: Kristen Devault; Pierre A Gremaud; Vera Novak; Mette S Olufsen; Guillaume Vernières; Peng Zhao Journal: Multiscale Model Simul Date: 2008-01-27 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Andreas M J Frölich; Marios N Psychogios; Ernst Klotz; Ramona Schramm; Michael Knauth; Peter Schramm Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Amrou Sarraj; Ameer E Hassan; James Grotta; Spiros Blackburn; Arthur Day; Michael Abraham; Clark Sitton; Mark Dannenbaum; Chunyan Cai; Deep Pujara; William Hicks; Nirav Vora; Ronald Budzik; Faris Shaker; Ashish Arora; Roy F Riascos; Haris Kamal; Sheryl Martin-Schild; Maarten Lansberg; Rishi Gupta; Gregory W Albers Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Emilie M M Santos; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Kilian M Treurniet; Alexander D Horsch; Yvo B Roos; L Jaap Kappelle; Wiro J Niessen; Charles B Majoie; Birgitta Velthuis; Henk A Marquering Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Søren Christensen; Michael Mlynash; Stephanie Kemp; Amarnath Yennu; Jeremy J Heit; Michael P Marks; Maarten G Lansberg; Gregory W Albers Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 10.170