Literature DB >> 34550584

Assessing Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-analysis.

Dean Langan1.   

Abstract

The random-effects model allows for the possibility that studies in a meta-analysis have heterogeneous effects. That is, observed study estimates vary not only due to random sampling error but also due to inherent differences in the way studies have been designed and conducted. In this chapter, we consider methods to estimate the heterogeneity variance parameter in a random-effects model, consider in more detail what this parameter represents and how the possible explanations for heterogeneity can be explored through statistical methods. Toward the end of this chapter, publication bias is discussed as an alternative explanation for why observed effect estimates might form some distribution other than what we might come to expect.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DerSimonian-Laird; Funnel plot asymmetry; Heterogeneity; Paule-Mandel; Publication bias; REML; Random-effects

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34550584     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  2 in total

1.  A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.

Authors:  Dean Langan; Julian P T Higgins; Dan Jackson; Jack Bowden; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Mark Simmonds
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.273

2.  Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.

Authors:  Dean Langan; Julian P T Higgins; Mark Simmonds
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.273

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Addition of Capecitabine to Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be the Most Effective Strategy for Patients With Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of 9 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Zhiyang Li; Jiehua Zheng; Zeqi Ji; Lingzhi Chen; Jinyao Wu; Juan Zou; Yiyuan Liu; Weixun Lin; Jiehui Cai; Yaokun Chen; Yexi Chen; Hai Lu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 2.  Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Mengyang Shi; Zhongli Liao; Weiqing Chen; Yongzhong Wu; Xu Tian
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.337

3.  Compound Taxus chinensis Capsule Combined with Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Keshuai Li; Haibo Cheng; Weixing Shen; Elaine Lai-Han Leung; Shao Le; Lili Yu; Han Xie; Xinbing Sui; Xiaoming Zhu; Qibiao Wu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.629

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.