| Literature DB >> 34550096 |
Junyu Zhao1,2, Qianping Zhang3, Yupeng Yang4, Jinming Yao1,2, Lin Liao1,2, Jianjun Dong5.
Abstract
The association between insulin resistance and thyroid carcinoma is controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis of association between insulin resistance and thyroid carcinoma. There were 14 studies included in this meta-analysis. Random-effect model was used to merge the weighted mean difference value of fasting serum insulin level and the pooled effect shows that the level of fasting serum insulin is higher in patients with thyroid carcinoma than those of controls (1.88, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.90, P=0.0003). Random-effect model was used to estimate the pooled weighted mean difference and it shows that thyroid carcinoma patients have a higher level of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) than patients without thyroid carcinoma (0.54, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.78, P<0.0001). Fixed-effect model with the odds ratio of insulin resistance shows that insulin resistance could increase the risk of thyroid carcinoma 216% compared with participants without insulin resistance (3.16, 95% CI 2.09 to 4.77, P<0.0001). In conclusion, insulin resistance might be a risk factor for thyroid carcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: HOMA-IR; case-control study; insulin resistance; meta-analysis; thyroid carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34550096 PMCID: PMC8507263 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Flow chart of the systematic search process.
Characteristic of 14 included studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Massimo Giusti, 2008 | Italy | DTC | Outpatients who had undergone thyroid surgery for benign thyroid diseases. | 96 | 87 | 57.0±13.7 | 56.5±15.9 | 80 | 90 |
| Jorge N. Rezzonico, 2009 | Argentina | DTC | Normal thyroid function, normal thyroid gland palpation, negative titers of antithyroid antibodies and normal thyroid ultrasonography. | 20 | 20 | 46.1±13.6 | 46.7±13.3 | 100 | 100 |
| Ankush Mittal, 2012 | Nepal | DTC | Normal healthy controls. | 50 | 50 | 58.9±11.0 | 57.6±10.0 | 76 | 76 |
| Mustafa Sahin, 2013 | Turkey | DTC | Not mentioned. | 344 | 116 | 45.5±11 | 44.9±8 | 84 | 85 |
| Fevzi Balkan, 2014 | Turkey | DTC | Euthyroid patients with nodular goiter who underwent surgery. | 41 | 41 | 43.7±10.4 | 47.3±10.9 | 90 | 90 |
| Musrafa Akker, 2014 | Turkey | DTC | Subjects without a history of cancer, determined by thyroid ultrasonography not to have a thyroid nodule, or found to be cancer free following thyroid surgery. | 93 | 111 | 50.2±12.2 | 36.9±9.8 | 85 | 57 |
| Wang Dan, 2014 | China | PTC | Benign thyroid nodule. | 50 | 49 | 46.68±12.72 | 49.40±11.10 | 68 | 80 |
| Min Jung Bae, 2016 | Korea | PTC | No definite nodules or showed a typical nodule that was benign-looking in nature, and benign results after fine-needle aspiration cytology. | 735 | 537 | 50.2±11.1 | 48.7±9.8 | Not mentioned. | |
| Jiang Yanyan, 2016 | China | PTC | Normal healthy controls. | 358 | 290 | 44.0±11.8 | 43.9±14.0 | 78 | 66 |
| Wo Xiaoyan, 2017 | China | PTC | Benign thyroid nodule. | 153 | 105 | 45.67±11.61 | 48.42±11.85 | 76 | 76 |
| Bekir Ucan, 2017 | Turkey | PTC | Age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched controls. | 54 | 24 | 42.4±10 | 42.5±9 | 87 | 75 |
| Zahra Heidari, 2017 | Iran | DTC | Healthy euthyroid control participants were chosen with normal thyroid sonography. | 30 | 30 | 34.4±12.7 | 34.1±12.8 | 80 | 80 |
| Guo XY, 2019 | China | PTC | Benign thyroid nodule. | 153 | 105 | 45.7±11.6 | 48.4±11.9 | 76 | 76 |
| Mele Chiara, 2019* | Italy | DTC | Benign thyroid nodule and healthy control. | 30 | 27; 20 | 50.0 (41.0-58.8) | 56.0 (53.5-65.0); 47.0 (37.0-62.5) | 70 | 85; 75 |
DTC, Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; PTC, Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma; *Data are expressed as the median (interquartile range); The rest data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Quality assessment according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Massimo Giusti, 2008 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Jorge N. Rezzonico, 2009 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Ankush Mittal, 2012 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mustafa Sahin, 2013 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Fevzi Balkan, 2014 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Musrafa Akker, 2014 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Wang Dan, 2014 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Min Jung Bae, 2016 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Jiang Yanyan, 2016 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Wo Xiaoyan, 2017 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Bekir Ucan, 2017 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Zahra Heidari, 2017 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Guo XY, 2019 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Mele Chiara, 2019 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Figure 2Forest plot of the fasting serum insulin level in patients with thyroid carcinoma.
Figure 3Forest plot of HOMA-IR in patients with thyroid carcinoma.
Figure 4Forest plot of insulin resistance and risk of thyroid carcinoma.
Figure 5Funnel plot of publication bias. (A) Funnel plot, qualitative evaluation of publication bias, performed by Review Manager 5.3. (B) Egger`s test, quantitatively measurement of publication bias, performed by Stata16.0.