Literature DB >> 34549948

Synthesis and Evaluation of Ubiquitin-Dioxetane Conjugate as a Chemiluminescent Probe for Monitoring Deubiquitinase Activity.

Sara Gutkin1, Satish Gandhesiri2, Ashraf Brik2, Doron Shabat1.   

Abstract

The removal of ubiquitin (Ub) from a modified protein or Ub chain is a process that occurs regularly by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This process is known to be mediated by various deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) in order to control the protein's half-life and its expression levels among many other signaling processes. Since the function of DUBs is also involved in numerous human diseases, such as cancer, there is an obvious need for an effective diagnostic probe that can monitor the activity of these enzymes. We have developed the first chemiluminescence probe for detection of DUBs activity. The probe was prepared by conjugation of the chemically synthesized C-terminally activated Ub(1-75) with a Gly-enolether precursor. Subsequent oxidation, under aqueous conditions, of the enolether conjuagate with singlet-oxygen furnished the dioxetane probe Ub-CL. This synthesis provides the first example of a dioxetane-luminophore protein conjugate. The probe's ability to detect deubiquitinating activity was successfully validated with three different DUBs. In order to demonstrate the advantage of our new probe, comparison measurements for detection of DUB UCH-L3 activity were performed between the chemiluminescent probe Ub-CL and the well-known Ub-AMC probe. The obtained data showed significantly higher S/N, for probe Ub-CL (>93-fold) in comparison to that observed for Ub-AMC (1.5-fold). We anticipate that the successful design and synthesis of the turn-ON protein-dioxetane conjugate probe, demonstrated in this work, will provide the insight and motivation for preparation of other relevant protein-dioxetane conjugates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34549948      PMCID: PMC8589252          DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioconjug Chem        ISSN: 1043-1802            Impact factor:   4.774


Ubiquitination is a reversible post-translational modification that involves the covalent attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) monomer or Ub chains to a target protein.[1] This process regulates the degradation of cellular proteins by the Ub-proteasome system (UPS) and controls a protein’s half-life, therefore affecting numerous signaling pathways.[2,3] While the conjugation of Ub to a target protein is performed by the ubiquitination enzymes (E1, E2, and E3), the removal of Ub from a ubiquitinated protein is mediated by a family of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs).[4−6] Since the function of DUBs is also involved in many human diseases, there is an obvious need for an effective diagnostic probe that can monitor the activity of these enzymes.[7,8] Such a probe is ordinarily used to screen small molecule inhibitors against DUBs for studying DUB activities and drug development.[9] Indeed, optical molecular probes for detection of DUB activity were developed years ago.[10−13] The detection mode of these probes is usually based on fluorescence, where 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) is used as a fluorescent dye.[14−16] Such a ubiquitin–AMC conjugate exhibits a typical turn-ON fluorescence response, following the DUB-mediated hydrolysis. Chemiluminescence modality has an inherent advantage over fluorescence, since irradiation by an external light source is not required.[17,18] As a result, there is no interference by autofluorescence, and the obtained background signal is extremely low.[19] Among the known chemiluminescent luminophores, the triggerable phenoxy-dioxetanes, discovered by Paul Schaap in 1987, are commonly used for chemiluminescent probe design.[20,21] Four years ago, a major breakthrough was achieved by our group, with the development of new-generation phenoxy-dioxetane luminophores.[22,23] These new dioxetane chemiluminescent luminophores exhibit up to 3000-fold enhancement in light-emission quantum yield (ΦCL) under physiological conditions.[24,25] Our group and others have utilized these dioxetane luminophores to prepare chemiluminescent probes for the detection and imaging of various enzymes and chemical analytes.[26−28] The most effective chemiluminescent probes, in terms of sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio, were obtained by masking the phenolic group of the luminophore with peptide substrates through a 4-aminobenzyl alcohol self-immolative linker.[29,30] Such probes produce extremely low background signal, due to their high stability toward spontaneous hydrolysis.[31] The enzymatic responsive group used to mask the phenoxy-dioxetane luminophores were all composed of small molecules or short peptides.[32−34] A responsive group based on a full protein substrate, attached to the dioxetane luminophore, has never been demonstrated. Here, we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a new chemiluminescent probe, based on a ubiquitin–dioxetane conjugate, for efficient detection of DUB activity. The general molecular structure and chemiexcitation disassembly pathway of the DUB chemiluminescent probe Ub-CL is presented in Figure . Probe Ub-CL is composed of the protein sequence Ub(1-76)-X, where X is the NH2 group of the self-immolative linker, p-amino-benzyl-alcohol (PABA). Proteolytic cleavage of the specific peptide bond between Gly76 and the PABA linker, followed by 1,6-elimination, releases the phenoxy-dioxetane luminophore I. This phenoxy-dioxetane then undergoes rapid chemiexcitation disassembly to produce benzoate II and a green photon.
Figure 1

Molecular structure and chemiexcitation disassembly pathway of DUB chemiluminescent probe Ub-CL.

Molecular structure and chemiexcitation disassembly pathway of DUB chemiluminescent probe Ub-CL. Phenoxy-dioxetane probes are regularly synthesized through oxidation of the corresponded enolether precursor by singlet oxygen. Therefore, we initially synthesized an enolether derivative, conjugated with the ubiquitin segment Ub(1-75). The chemical synthesis of conjugate Ub-Enolether 3 is presented in Figure . Fmoc-Gly was coupled with 4-aminobenzyl-alcohol to generate amide 1a. Iodination of the benzylic position of 1a with sodium iodide and trimethylsilyl chloride yielded benzyl-iodide 1b. The latter was reacted with previously synthesized phenol 1c under mild basic conditions to afford ether 1d. The allyl and Fmoc protecting groups in compound 1d were removed by Pd(PPh3)4. Subsequent addition of piperidine resulted with removal of the Fmoc protecting group to generate Enolether 2. Next, the amine functional group of Enolether 2 was coupled with the chemically synthesized Ub(1-75)-MeNbz[35] (compound 1, see Supporting Information for synthesis) to yield the desired ubiquitin–enolether conjugate Ub-Enolether 3.
Figure 2

Synthetic route for the preparation of conjugate Ub-Enolether 3.

Synthetic route for the preparation of conjugate Ub-Enolether 3. With Ub-Enolether 3 in hand, we sought oxidation conditions, appropriate for enolether–protein conjugates, which can be performed by singlet oxygen.[36,37] Since singlet oxygen is a highly reactive reagent, that undergoes quenching to some extent, by polar solvents like water,[38] the oxidation procedure of the enolether precursor is usually performed in a nonpolar organic solvent like methylene chloride. The enolether precursor of probe Ub-CL is composed of the Ub protein, conjugated with the enolether small molecule. Such a protein conjugate can be mainly solubilized in aqueous solvents. Therefore, we initially sought to develop a procedure aimed to establish oxidation conditions for general enolethers, by singlet oxygen, in aqueous solvent, which can also be applied to other similar systems. Enolether 2 was selected as a model compound for developing oxidation conditions in the aqueous solvent, PBS 7.4. Thus, the oxidation of Enolether 2 was evaluated in PBS 7.4, using polystyrene-bound Rose Bengal as a photosensitizer, and irradiation with white light, while oxygen is bubbled through the reaction solvent. The reaction progress was monitored by RP-HPLC (Figure A). Within 45 min under such conditions, more than 50% of Enolether 2 was oxidized to form the desired Dioxetane 2a. In addition, gradual decomposition of the dioxetane to its corresponded Benzoate 2b is also observed. After keeping the reaction time of 60 min, Dioxetane 2a appeared as the major product of the reaction. Further extending the reaction time resulted in substantial formation of Benzoate 2b. Therefore, oxidation under these conditions for 60 min yielded the optimal results in our hands.
Figure 3

(A) RP-HPLC chromatograms showing the reaction progress, over 60 min, for oxidation of Enolether 2 to Dioxetane 2a in PBS 7.4 as a solvent, polystyrene-bound Rose Bengal as a photosynthesizer, oxygen bubbling and irradiation with white light. The reaction progress was monitored at wavelength of 285 nm. (B) Oxidation of Ub-Enolether 3 by singlet oxygen to its corresponded dioxetane, probe Ub-CL in TRIS buffer, pH 7.5. The Mass obtained for dioxetane probe Ub-CL (9071) is suitable to oxidation of the S methionine group to SO2.

(A) RP-HPLC chromatograms showing the reaction progress, over 60 min, for oxidation of Enolether 2 to Dioxetane 2a in PBS 7.4 as a solvent, polystyrene-bound Rose Bengal as a photosynthesizer, oxygen bubbling and irradiation with white light. The reaction progress was monitored at wavelength of 285 nm. (B) Oxidation of Ub-Enolether 3 by singlet oxygen to its corresponded dioxetane, probe Ub-CL in TRIS buffer, pH 7.5. The Mass obtained for dioxetane probe Ub-CL (9071) is suitable to oxidation of the S methionine group to SO2. The establishment of conditions for the oxidation of enolethers to dioxetanes with singlet oxygen, under aqueous conditions, is of high importance, since protein–enolether conjugates are likely to be not soluble/compatible in/with organic solvents. Applying the established oxidation conditions on Ub-Enolether 3, and subsequent filtration of the polystyrene-bound Rose Bengal photosensitizer, afforded the desired probe Ub-CL (Figure B). The obtained probe was used for measurements, in its current status, with no further purification steps. With probe Ub-CL in hand, we sought to evaluate its ability to detect the catalytic activity of various DUBs. The probe was incubated in a suitable buffer and its chemiluminescence light emission profile was measured with three different DUBs: UCH-L3, UCH-L1, and USP-2 (Figure ). Probe Ub-CL in the presence of USP-2 showed only slight light emission enhancement (2.5-fold), but still significantly higher than the background signal (Figure C). Remarkably, the total light emission signal produced by Ub-CL upon incubation with UCH-L1 (Figure B) and UCH-L3 (Figure A) was significantly higher than the background signal (in the absence of the DUB), with S/N values of 45 and 300, respectively. The substantially higher catalytic activity observed for UCH-L3 DUB, toward activation of probe Ub-CL, was observed before with other assays.[10,39,40] Nevertheless, probe Ub-CL was able to clearly detect the activity of all three DUBs evaluated in this assay. It appears that probe Ub-CL is poorly turned over by USP-2; thus, this probe may be best suited for the UCH family DUBs.
Figure 4

Chemiluminescence kinetic profile (left) and total light emission (right) of probe Ub-CL [10 μM] in TRIS PH 7.5, DTT [0.2 mM] with and without (A) UCH-L3 [0.8 nM], (B) UCH-L1 [50 nM], and (C) USP-2 [12 nM]. The total light emission was measured over 15 min at 37 °C. Error bars represent the mean of three different replicate measurements.

Chemiluminescence kinetic profile (left) and total light emission (right) of probe Ub-CL [10 μM] in TRIS PH 7.5, DTT [0.2 mM] with and without (A) UCH-L3 [0.8 nM], (B) UCH-L1 [50 nM], and (C) USP-2 [12 nM]. The total light emission was measured over 15 min at 37 °C. Error bars represent the mean of three different replicate measurements. As mentioned above, turn-ON chemiluminescent probes have an inherent advantage over fluorescent probes. The request for an external light excitation source in fluorescence generates a substantial noise signal. In chemiluminescence, the excited state of the emitter is formed through breakage of energetic chemical bonds. When the molecule has high chemical stability, this mode of excitation practically produced zero noise signal. In order to demonstrate the advantage of our DUB chemiluminescent probe, we performed comparison measurements of the S/N ratio produced by probe Ub-CL, and the commercially available fluorescent probe Ub-AMC. The probes were incubated with and without DUB UCH-L3 in TRIS pH 7.5, under similar conditions, and the produced optical signal was measured over 25 min (Figure ). Expectedly, both probes produced a typical turn-ON response, upon reaction with UCH-L3, for either the chemiluminescence or the fluorescence mode of action. However, the background signal produced by fluorescent probe Ub-AMC is considerably higher than the background signal observed for our chemiluminescent probe Ub-CL. In addition, probe Ub-CL exhibited a faster response to UCH-L3, with a signal intensity of up to 93-fold higher than the signal intensity without the DUB. In contrast, probe Ub-AMC produced only a 1.5-fold increase over the background signal without the DUB at a similar time slot. The significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio, obtained for probe Ub-CL, clearly demonstrates the superior detection capability of the chemiluminescence modality over a fluorescent one.
Figure 5

(A) Chemiluminescence (left) and fluorescence (right) kinetic profiles of Ub-CL [50 nM] and Ub-AMC [1 μM] in TRIS pH 7.5, DTT [0.2 mM] at 37 °C with and without UCH-L3 [0.8 nM]. (B) Signal to noise ratios obtained for probes Ub-CL (left) and Ub-AMC (right) with and without UCH-L3. The values were calculated at peak-max for chemiluminescence, after 3 min, since the starting measurement. Error bars represent the mean of three different replicate measurements.

(A) Chemiluminescence (left) and fluorescence (right) kinetic profiles of Ub-CL [50 nM] and Ub-AMC [1 μM] in TRIS pH 7.5, DTT [0.2 mM] at 37 °C with and without UCH-L3 [0.8 nM]. (B) Signal to noise ratios obtained for probes Ub-CL (left) and Ub-AMC (right) with and without UCH-L3. The values were calculated at peak-max for chemiluminescence, after 3 min, since the starting measurement. Error bars represent the mean of three different replicate measurements. The dioxetane–Ub conjugate, described herein, acts as a turn-ON chemiluminescent probe for detection of DUBs activity. The activation mechanism is based on the catalytic cleavage of Ub at a specific site, and results in the release of a phenoxy-dioxetane luminophore that undergoes rapid chemiexcitation to emit light. As shown in Figure , the oxidation of the Ub-enolether precursor with singlet oxygen, under aqueous conditions, was incomplete and also generates some benzoate decomposition product. However, unlike the fluorescence assay, in the chemiluminescence modality, such side products do not produce any noise signal. Thus, the obtained dioxetane–Ub conjugate can directly be used, without further purification, after removal of the polymer-immobilized photosensitizer by filtration. The exact concertation of the active dioxetane species of the Ub-Cl probe can be extrapolated by a light-emission calibration curve, obtained for an analogous known chemiluminescent probe. Importantly, the dioxetane functional group of the Ub conjugate was found to be highly stable over several days of storage (see Figure S7 in the Supporting Information), and the light-emission signal, produced by the dioxetane–ubiquitin probe, has remained quantitively similar over the evaluated time period. In summary, we have developed the first chemiluminescence probe for detection of DUBs activity. The probe was prepared by conjugation of the chemically synthesized C-terminal of Ub1–75 protein with the NH2-Gly-enolether precursor. Subsequent oxidation, under aqueous conditions, of the enolether precursor with singlet oxygen furnished the synthesis dioxetane probe Ub-CL. This synthesis provides the first example of a dioxetane–luminophore conjugate with a protein. The probe ability to detect DUB’s activity was successfully validated with three different DUBs. In order to demonstrate the advantage of our new probe, comparison measurements for detection DUB UCH-L3 activity were performed between the chemiluminescent probe Ub-CL and a commercially available fluorescent probe Ub-AMC. The obtained data showed significantly higher S/N, observed for probe Ub-CL (93-fold) in comparison to that observed for probe Ub-AMC (1.5-fold). The successful synthesis and demonstration of this protein–dioxetane conjugate example, as a turn-ON probe, open a door for preparation of other relevant protein–dioxetane conjugates, such as those for Ub-like modifiers and for other biomacromolecules, e.g., nucleic acids.
  36 in total

1.  Targeting deubiquitinases enabled by chemical synthesis of proteins.

Authors:  Shimrit Ohayon; Liat Spasser; Amir Aharoni; Ashraf Brik
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Synthesis and characterization of fluorescent ubiquitin derivatives as highly sensitive substrates for the deubiquitinating enzymes UCH-L3 and USP-2.

Authors:  Aline Tirat; Alain Schilb; Virginie Riou; Lukas Leder; Bernd Gerhartz; Johann Zimmermann; Susanne Worpenberg; Ulf Eidhoff; Felix Freuler; Thomas Stettler; Lorenz Mayr; Johannes Ottl; Beate Leuenberger; Ireos Filipuzzi
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Chemiluminescent probe for the in vitro detection of protease activity.

Authors:  Jean-Alexandre Richard; Ludovic Jean; Anthony Romieu; Marc Massonneau; Pauline Noack-Fraissignes; Pierre-Yves Renard
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 6.005

Review 4.  Recent applications of chemiluminescence assays in clinical immunology.

Authors:  A R Rodríguez-Orozco; H Ruiz-Reyes; N Medina-Serriteño
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.862

5.  De novo macrocyclic peptides that specifically modulate Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains.

Authors:  Mickal Nawatha; Joseph M Rogers; Steven M Bonn; Ido Livneh; Betsegaw Lemma; Sachitanand M Mali; Ganga B Vamisetti; Hao Sun; Beatrice Bercovich; Yichao Huang; Aaron Ciechanover; David Fushman; Hiroaki Suga; Ashraf Brik
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 24.427

6.  Nonenzymatic polyubiquitination of expressed proteins.

Authors:  Hosahalli P Hemantha; Sudhir N Bavikar; Yifat Herman-Bachinsky; Najat Haj-Yahya; Somasekhar Bondalapati; Aaron Ciechanover; Ashraf Brik
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Self-cleavable chemiluminescent probes suitable for protease sensing.

Authors:  Jean-Alexandre Richard; Ludovic Jean; Caroline Schenkels; Marc Massonneau; Anthony Romieu; Pierre-Yves Renard
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Opening a Gateway for Chemiluminescence Cell Imaging: Distinctive Methodology for Design of Bright Chemiluminescent Dioxetane Probes.

Authors:  Ori Green; Tal Eilon; Nir Hananya; Sara Gutkin; Christoph R Bauer; Doron Shabat
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 14.553

9.  A chemiluminescent probe for cellular peroxynitrite using a self-immolative oxidative decarbonylation reaction.

Authors:  Jian Cao; Weiwei An; Audrey G Reeves; Alexander R Lippert
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Engineered unnatural ubiquitin for optimal detection of deubiquitinating enzymes.

Authors:  Wioletta Rut; Mikolaj Zmudzinski; Scott J Snipas; Miklos Bekes; Tony T Huang; Marcin Drag
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 9.825

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Chemiluminescent spiroadamantane-1,2-dioxetanes: Recent advances in molecular imaging and biomarker detection.

Authors:  Husain N Kagalwala; R Tate Reeves; Alexander R Lippert
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 8.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.