| Literature DB >> 34549182 |
Hirokazu Takami1,2, Kaishi Satomi1,3, Kohei Fukuoka1,4, Shintaro Fukushima1,3, Yuko Matsushita1,5, Kai Yamasaki1,6, Taishi Nakamura1,7, Shota Tanaka2, Akitake Mukasa2,8, Nobuhito Saito2, Tomonari Suzuki9, Takaaki Yanagisawa9,10, Hideo Nakamura8,11, Kazuhiko Sugiyama12, Kaoru Tamura13, Taketoshi Maehara13, Mitsutoshi Nakada14, Masahiro Nonaka15, Akio Asai15, Kiyotaka Yokogami16, Hideo Takeshima16, Toshihiko Iuchi17, Yonehiro Kanemura18,19, Keiichi Kobayashi20, Motoo Nagane20, Kazuhiko Kurozumi21,22, Koji Yoshimoto23, Masahide Matsuda24, Akira Matsumura24, Yuichi Hirose25, Tsutomu Tokuyama22,26, Toshihiro Kumabe27, Yoshitaka Narita5, Soichiro Shibui5, Yoichi Nakazato28, Ryo Nishikawa9, Masao Matsutani9, Koichi Ichimura1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Germinoma preferentially occurs in pediatric and young adult age groups. Although they are responsive to treatment with chemotherapy and radiation, the treatment may cause long-term sequelae in their later lives. Here, we searched for clinical and histopathological features to predict the prognosis of germinoma and affect treatment response.Entities:
Keywords: germ cell tumor; germinoma; prognosis; tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
Year: 2021 PMID: 34549182 PMCID: PMC8446917 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurooncol Adv ISSN: 2632-2498
Figure 1.(A) Histogram showing the distribution of the tumor cell content. The tumor cell content varied widely among cases. The 3 H–E slides at the bottom show the representative cases of low tumor cell content (GCT56, <5%), median tumor cell content percentage (GCT78, 50%), and high tumor cell content percentage (GCT29, 90%). Inset: the arrows show tumor cells and the arrowhead shows a lymphocyte. (B) The comparison of tumor cell content between the histopathological assessment on H–E specimen and the 450K methylation analysis (R2 = 0.46).
Figure 2.Tumor cell content was correlated with clinical factors. (A) Female cases showed significantly higher tumor cell content than male cases (P = .002). (B) Tumor cell content was comparable among different age groups (P = .69). (C) Cases with lesions at atypical sites (basal ganglia, cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem) showed slightly higher tumor cell content than cases at typical sites, although not significant (P = .028). (D) Tumor cell content was comparable among cases that underwent biopsy, subtotal resection (STR), and gross total resection (GTR) (P = .37). *P < 0.05.
Figure 3.Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for progression-free survival (PFS) analyses. (A) Cases with high tumor cell content (≥50%, n = 48) showed shorter PFS than cases with low tumor cell content (<50%, n = 43) (P = .03). (B) Cases with lesions at atypical sites (n = 12) showed shorter PFS than cases with lesions at typical sites (n = 79) (P = .03). *P < 0.05.
Univariate Log-Rank/Cox-Regression Analysis on Progression-Free Survival With Clinical Factors and Tumor Cell Content
| Factor | n | P | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | .41 | ||
| Female | 15 | 1 | |
| Male | 76 | 0.58 (0.16–2.14) | |
| Age (y) | .68 | ||
| –10 | 7 | 5.03e−9 (0–) | |
| 11–20 | 51 | 1 | |
| 21–30 | 24 | 0.95 (0.25–3.67) | |
| 31– | 9 | 1.63 (0.34–7.86) | |
| Location | .03* | ||
| Atypical site | 12 | 3.65 (1.08–12.26) | |
| Typical sites | 79 | 1 | |
| Extent of resection | .61 | ||
| Biopsy | 56 | 1 | |
| STR | 28 | 0.70 (0.19–2.60) | |
| GTR | 4 | 6.54e−9 (0–) | |
| Tumor cell content | .03* | ||
| <50% | 43 | 1 | |
| ≥50% | 48 | 4.73 (1.04–21.58) | |
| MAPK mutation | .76 | ||
| Negative | 22 | 1 | |
| Positive | 35 | 1.31 (0.24–7.19) | |
| PI3K mutation | .25 | ||
| Negative | 47 | 1 | |
| Positive | 10 | 2.61 (0.48–14.28) | |
| Mutation | .38 | ||
| Both negative | 18 | 1 | |
| Either positive | 39 | 2.54 (0.29–21.84) |
AFP, alpha fetoprotein; CI, confidence interval; GTR, gross total resection; HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; NA, not applicable; STR, subtotal resection.
*P < 0.05.
Multivariate Cox Proportional Analysis on Progression-Free Survival With Tumor Location and Tumor Cell Content
| Factor | P | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Location | .10 | |
| Atypical | 2.99 (0.89–10.11) | |
| Typical | 1 | |
| Tumor cell content | .036* | |
| <50% | 1 | |
| ≥50% | 4.20 (0.91–19.37) |
CI, confidence interval.
*P < 0.05.
Prognosis After Chemotherapy and Local Radiation Therapy
| Case ID | Age | Sex | Tumor Location | Tumor Cell Content (%) | Total HCG | AFP | Surgery (GTR, STR, Biopsy) | Radiation Therapy | Chemotherapy | MAPK Pathway Mutation | PI3K/MTOR Pathway Mutation | PFS (m) | Recurrence (yes = 0, no = 1) | OS (m) | Outcome (Survived = 1, Died = 0) | Primary (P) or Recurrent (R) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (IU/L) | CSF (IU/L) | Serum (ng/mL) | CSF (ng/mL) | |||||||||||||||
| GCT84 | 12 | M | N | 80 | ND | ND | ND | ND | STR | Yes | Yes | Mut | Wt | 52.2 | 0 | 52.2 | 1 | P |
| GCT147 | 12 | M | N | 20 | ND | ND | 1 | ND | Biopsy | Yes | Yes | ND | ND | 44.7 | 1 | 44.7 | 1 | P |
| GCT161 | 8 | F | N | 10 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | STR | Yes | Yes | ND | ND | 158.0 | 1 | 158.0 | 1 | P |
| GCT202 | 20 | F | N, V | 40 | ND | ND | ND | ND | Biopsy | Yes | Yes | ND | ND | 245.2 | 1 | 245.2 | 1 | P |
| GCT231 | 15 | M | P | 20 | ND | ND | ND | ND | GTR | Yes | Yes | ND | ND | 228.5 | 1 | 228.5 | 1 | P |
| GCT232 | 16 | M | B | 50 | ND | ND | ND | ND | Biopsy | Yes | Yes | ND | ND | 25.1 | 0 | 25.1 | 1 | P |
| GCT236 | 32 | F | N | 60 | ND | ND | ND | ND | STR | Yes | Yes | ND | ND | 29.0 | 0 | 29.0 | 1 | P |
AFP, alpha fetoprotein; B, basal ganglia; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; F, female; GTR, gross total resection; HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; M, male; N, neurohypophysis; ND, no data; O, other locations; OS, overall survival; P, pineal gland; PFS, progression-free survival; SP, spinal cord; STR, subtotal resection; V, ventricle.