| Literature DB >> 34547568 |
Wojciech Mrozik1, Babak Minofar2, Thunchanok Thongsamer3, Nathacha Wiriyaphong3, Sasiwimol Khawkomol4, Jidapa Plaimart5, John Vakros6, Hrissi Karapanagioti6, Soydoa Vinitnantharat3, David Werner5.
Abstract
In this work, we evaluated the valorisation of agricultural waste materials by transforming coconut husks and shells, corncobs and rice straw into biochar for water treatment in aquaculture. We compared the biochars' suitability for removal of organic micropollutants (acetaminophen, oxytetracycline, tetracycline, enrofloxacin, atrazine, diuron and diclofenac) from surface water needed for aquaculture. The biochars were prepared by three methods ranging from inexpensive drum kilns (200 °C) to pyrolysis with biogasfication (350-750 °C). Overall, antibiotics tetracycline and enrofloxacin were the most strongly sorbed micropollutants, and coconut husk biochar prepared at 750 °C was the best sorbent material. Molecular Dynamics simulations indicated that the major sorption mechanism is via π-π stacking interactions and there is a possibility of multilayer sorption for some of the micropollutants. We observed, a strong impact of ionic strength (salinity), which is an important consideration in coastal aquaculture applications. High salinity decreased the sorption for antibiotics oxytetracycline, tetracycline and enrofloxacin but increased diclofenac, atrazine and diuron sorption. We considered coconut husk biochar produced in drum kilns the most practical option for biochar applications in small-scale coastal aquacultures in South Asia. Pilot trials of canal water filtration at an aquaculture farm revealed that micropollutant sorption by coconut husk biochar under real-world conditions might be 10-500 times less than observed in the laboratory studies. Even so, biochar amendment of sand enhanced the micropollutant retention, which may facilitate subsequent biodegradation and improve the quality of brackish surface water used for food production in coastal aquaculture.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural waste; Aquaculture; Biochar; Micropollutants; Molecular dynamics simulations; Sorption
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34547568 PMCID: PMC8542888 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Manage ISSN: 0301-4797 Impact factor: 6.789
Properties of the selected pollutants.
| Name | Structure | Molecular mass [g/mol] | pKa | logP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| acetaminophen | 151 | 9.5 | 0.51 | |
| atrazine | 215 | 1.68 | 2.61 | |
| diclofenac | 296 | 4.15 | 4.51 | |
| enrofloxacin | 359 | pKa1 : 5.88–6.06 | 4.7 | |
| diuron | 233 | n/a | 2.87 | |
| tetracycline | 444 | multiple | 0.09 | |
| oxytetracycline | 460 | multiple | - 0.9 |
DrugBank database (DrugBank.ca, 2020).
Fig. 1Sorption coefficients (Kbc) of micropollutants for selected biochars - initial biochar loading of 200 mg/L.
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering of sorption similarity according to biochar type.
Fig. 3Hierarchical clustering of sorption similarity according to micropollutant types.
Fig. 4Influence of ionic strength on sorption of micropollutants on selected biochars. CH - drum kiln method; CHP - pyrolysis method; CHE 550 - pyrolysis at a fixed temperature of 550 °C.
Fig. 5Shanshot from MD simulation showing the π-π stacking interactions of R18S biochar surface with a) hydrophobic surface of TC; b) TC where multilayer is formed c) ACM where not multilayer is formed.
Fig. 6Radial distribution function of organic micro pollutant molecules center of, mass around R18 biochar molecules.
Fig. 7Measured breakthrough curves for the field trails and simulations with the instaneous local sorption equilibrium model (solid line) and kinetic sorption model (broken line) for a) tetracycline, b) diuron, c) enrofloxacin, and, d) atrazine S = sand; CH = coconut husk biochar; CHCHI = coconut husk biochar impregnated with chitosan.
Linear sand-water partitioning coefficient Ks and apparent biochar-water partitioning coefficient Kbc fitted from field filtration experiment in comparison with values from the batch screening study.
| Fitted from filtration experiment | Batch study | |
|---|---|---|
| Tetracycline | ||
| Ks (L/kg) | 1.4 | n.a. |
| Kbc for CH (L/kg) | 12.2 | 1859 |
| Kbc for CH_CHI (L/kg) | 12.7 | 648 |
| Enrofloxacin | ||
| Ks (L/kg) | <0.1 | n.a. |
| Kbc for CH (L/kg) | 7.0 | 1315 |
| Kbc for CH_CHI (L/kg) | 8.4 | 1551 |
| Atrazine | ||
| Ks (L/kg) | 0.2 | n.a. |
| Kbc for CH (L/kg) | 24.6 | 292 |
| Kbc for CH_CHI (L/kg) | <0.1 | 279 |
| Diuron | ||
| Ks (L/kg) | 0.7 | n.a. |
| Kbc for CH (L/kg) | 19.2 | 2405 |
| Kbc for CH_CHI (L/kg) | 1.7 | 866 |