| Literature DB >> 34546969 |
Guan Yang1,2, Yuexiang Li3, Shijie Liu4, Chuannan Liu2, Chen Jia2, Songtao Wang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mobile phone addiction (MPA) has recently aroused much attention due to its high incidence and considerable health hazards. Although some existing studies have documented that physical activity is negatively associated with MPA, it is little known about the potential effects underlying this relation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between physical activity and MPA among undergraduates in China, and to further examine the moderating effect of exercise type in the relation between them.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese undergraduates; aerobic endurance exercise; exercise type; mobile phone addiction; moderating effect; physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34546969 PMCID: PMC8997213 DOI: 10.1556/2006.2021.00059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Behav Addict ISSN: 2062-5871 Impact factor: 6.756
Comparisons of socio-demographic variables, physical activity level, and exercise type between subjects among three groups of MPA (N = 608)
| Total ( | No MPA ( | Possible MPA ( | MPA ( | χ2 |
| |
|
| ||||||
| Male | 158 (26.0%) | 29 (18.4%) | 120 (75.9%) | 9 (5.7%) | 5.087* | 0.091 |
| Female | 450 (74.0%) | 54 (12.0%) | 356 (79.1%) | 40 (8.9%) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Liberal Arts | 317 (52.1%) | 35 (11.0%) | 250 (78.9%) | 32 (10.1%) | 6.739** | 0.105 |
| Science | 291 (47.9%) | 48 (16.5%) | 226 (77.7%) | 17 (5.8%) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Rural | 153 (25.2%) | 28 (18.3%) | 116 (75.8%) | 9 (5.9%) | 4.599 | 0.087 |
| Urban | 455 (74.8%) | 55 (12.1%) | 360 (79.1%) | 40 (8.8%) | ||
|
| ||||||
| None exercise | 169 (27.8%) | 21 (12.4%) | 131 (77.5%) | 17 (10.1%) | 19.471*** | 0.137 |
| Low exercise | 273 (44.9%) | 28 (10.3%) | 225 (82.4%) | 20 (7.3%) | ||
| Medium exercise | 91 (15.0%) | 24 (26.4%) | 58 (63.7%) | 9 (9.9%) | ||
| High exercise | 75 (12.3%) | 10 (13.3%) | 62 (82.7%) | 3 (4.0%) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Aerobic endurance | 364 (59.9%) | 57 (15.7%) | 281 (77.2%) | 26 (7.1%) | 6.805 | 0.075 |
| Confrontation | 70 (11.5%) | 6 (8.6%) | 56 (80.0%) | 8 (11.4%) | ||
| Separated net | 63 (10.4%) | 4 (6.3%) | 53 (84.1%) | 6 (9.5%) | ||
| Difficulty beauty | 111 (18.3%) | 16 (14.4%) | 86 (77.5%) | 9 (8.1%) | ||
Note: MPA, mobile phone addiction; * P < 0.10; ** P < 0.05; *** P < 0.01.
The score of MPA and its four dimensions at different physical activity level
| WS | SB | SC | MC | MPA | |
| Activity level | |||||
| None exercise ( | 18.10 ± 4.24 | 10.26 ± 3.03 | 8.40 ± 2.92 | 7.86 ± 2.41 | 44.62 ± 10.58 |
| Low exercise ( | 17.82 ± 4.28 | 9.74 ± 3.19 | 7.95 ± 2.62 | 7.62 ± 2.36 | 43.12 ± 10.32 |
| Medium exercise ( | 16.46 ± 5.11 | 9.31 ± 3.48 | 7.22 ± 2.63 | 6.77 ± 2.48 | 39.76 ± 11.88 |
| High exercise ( | 16.77 ± 4.06 | 9.93 ± 2.74 | 7.37 ± 2.39 | 7.24 ± 2.22 | 41.32 ± 10.63 |
| F(3,604) | 3.906** | 2.002 | 4.914** | 4.665** | 4.799** |
| Partial | 0.019 | 0.009 | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.023 |
| Multiple comparisons | None>Moderate** | None>Moderate* | None>Moderate** | None>Moderate*** | None>Moderate*** |
Note: MPA, mobile phone addiction; WS, withdrawal symptoms; SB, salience behavior; SC, social comfort; MC, mind changes; LSD, least significant difference. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Pearson's correlation between physical activity, MPA and its four dimensions (N = 608)
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 1. Physical activity | ―― | |||||
| 2.Withdrawal symptoms | −0.113** | ―― | ||||
| 3.Salience behavior | −0.035 | 0.711*** | ―― | |||
| 4.Social comfort | −0.125** | 0.562*** | 0.503*** | ―― | ||
| 5.Mood changes | −0.087* | 0.641*** | 0.635*** | 0.428*** | ―― | |
| 6.Mobile phone addiction | −0.109** | 0.914*** | 0.863*** | 0.734*** | 0.789*** | ―― |
Note: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
The moderating effect of exercise type between physical activity and MPA
| Outcome | Predictors |
|
| Lower CI | Upper CI |
| MPA | Gender | 0.271 | 2.41 | 0.050 | 0.491 |
| Major | −0.169 | −1.99 | −0.335 | −0.002 | |
| PA | −0.266 | −3.85*** | −0.401 | −0.130 | |
| W1 | 0.263 | 2.04 | 0.010 | 0.516 | |
| W2 | 0.445 | 2.44 | 0.087 | 0.802 | |
| W3 | 0.059 | 0.55 | −0.153 | 0.272 | |
| PA × W1 | 0.397 | 2.92 | 0.131 | 0.664 | |
| PA × W2 | 0.276 | 2.22 | 0.032 | 0.519 | |
| PA × W3 | 0.202 | 1.97 | −0.001 | 0.405 | |
| Model fit index |
| 0.064 | |||
|
| 4.577 | ||||
Note: MPA, mobile phone addiction; PA, physical activity; the reference group, aerobic endurance programs (n = 364); W1, separated net programs (n = 63); W2, confrontation programs (n = 70); W3, difficulty beauty programs (n = 111); Lower CI, lower-level confidence interval; Upper CI, upper-level confidence interval; β = standardized coefficient.* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Fig. 1.The plot of the relationship between PA and MPA at different kinds of exercise type