Literature DB >> 34546555

Reinforcement sensitivity and bulimia symptoms: the role of emotion regulation.

Lindsey Barrios1, Sydney N Stamatovich2, Raluca M Simons2, Jeffrey S Simons2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) provides a theoretical foundation associated with various approach and avoidance behaviors and individual personality differences. Sensitivity to reward and punishment, two neural systems within the RST have been significantly associated with bingeing and purging behaviors. However, inconsistent findings are observed and specific factors mediating these relationships are not well understood. Deficits in emotion regulation may account for these relationships, as both negative urgency and distress tolerance have been independently associated with bulimia behaviors. Thus, this is an area that requires further investigation.
METHOD: The current study utilized various self-report inventories, including the Eating Disorder Inventory-3rd Edition to measure bulimia symptoms, as well as measures of negative affect, sensitivity to reward and punishment, distress tolerance, and negative urgency. These measures were used to assess whether distress tolerance and negative urgency mediated associations between sensitivity to reward and punishment and bulimia symptoms in a community sample of 394 young adults ranging from the ages of 18 to 25.
RESULTS: As expected, sensitivity to reward and punishment were significantly associated with decreased distress tolerance. Distress tolerance was also directly associated with greater negative urgency, which was significantly associated with increased bulimia symptoms. Consistent with hypotheses, indirect associations between sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment to bulimia symptoms via distress tolerance and negative urgency were observed, controlling for gender and negative affect. DISCUSSION: Results contribute to understanding specific contributions of risk factors within the relationship of sensitivity to reward and punishment and bulimia symptoms, measured by the EDI-3. Novel to existing literature, results indicate that reinforcement sensitivity significantly contributes to emotion regulation deficits. Thus, these findings may have important implications for understanding the development and treatment of bulimia symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, based on descriptive, cross-sectional data.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulimia symptoms; Distress tolerance; Eating disorders; Emotion regulation; Negative affect; Negative urgency; Punishment; Reinforcement sensitivity theory; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34546555     DOI: 10.1007/s40519-021-01275-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Weight Disord        ISSN: 1124-4909            Impact factor:   4.652


  34 in total

1.  Eating disorder symptoms among college students: prevalence, persistence, correlates, and treatment-seeking.

Authors:  Daniel Eisenberg; Emily J Nicklett; Kathryn Roeder; Nina E Kirz
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model.

Authors:  Alexander L Chapman; Kim L Gratz; Milton Z Brown
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-03

Review 3.  Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations.

Authors:  Patricia Bijttebier; Ilse Beck; Laurence Claes; Walter Vandereycken
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04-07

4.  Testing for interactive and non-linear effects of risk factors for binge eating and purging eating disorders.

Authors:  Karina L Allen; Susan M Byrne; Ross D Crosby; Eric Stice
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-08-27

5.  Social reward and social punishment sensitivity in relation to dietary restraint and binge/purge symptoms.

Authors:  Lauren M Fussner; Aaron M Luebbe; April R Smith
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 6.  Research Review: What we have learned about the causes of eating disorders - a synthesis of sociocultural, psychological, and biological research.

Authors:  Kristen M Culbert; Sarah E Racine; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Low distress tolerance as an indirect risk factor for suicidal behavior: considering the explanatory role of non-suicidal self-injury.

Authors:  Michael D Anestis; Stephanie M Pennings; Jason M Lavender; Matthew T Tull; Kim L Gratz
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.735

8.  Examining the moderating role of social norms between body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in college students.

Authors:  K Jean Forney; Rose Marie Ward
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2012-11-22

9.  The multifaceted role of distress tolerance in dysregulated eating behaviors.

Authors:  Michael D Anestis; Edward A Selby; Erin L Fink; Thomas E Joiner
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.861

10.  Negative urgency and expectancies increase vulnerability to binge eating in bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Sarah Fischer; Joseph Wonderlich; Lauren Breithaupt; Catherine Byrne; Scott Engel
Journal:  Eat Disord       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.222

View more
  1 in total

1.  Eating and Control Styles Axis in Mentalisation-Based Psychotherapy in Eating Disorders: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Moria Golan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.435

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.