Literature DB >> 34546549

Identifying potential inhibitors of biofilm-antagonistic proteins to promote biofilm formation: a virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations approach.

Mayur Mukhi1, A S Vishwanathan2.   

Abstract

Microbial biofilms play a critical role in environmental biotechnology and associated applications. Biofilm production can be enhanced by inhibiting the function of proteins that negatively regulate their formation. With this objective, an in silico approach was adopted to identify competitive inhibitors of eight biofilm-antagonistic proteins, namely AbrB and SinR (from Bacillus subtilis) and AmrZ, PDE (EAL), PslG, RetS, ShrA and TpbA (from Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Fifteen inhibitors that structurally resembled the natural ligand of each protein were shortlisted using ligand-based and structure-based virtual screening. The top four inhibitors obtained from molecular docking using Autodock Vina were further docked using SwissDock and DOCK 6.9 to obtain a consensus hit for each protein based on different scoring functions. Further analysis of the protein-ligand complexes revealed that these top inhibitors formed significant non-covalent interactions with their respective protein binding sites. The eight protein-ligand complexes were then subjected to molecular dynamics simulations for 30 ns using GROMACS. RMSD and radius of gyration values of 0.1-0.4 nm and 1.0-3.5 nm, respectively, along with hydrogen bond formation throughout the trajectory indicated that all the complexes remained stable, compact and intact during the simulation period. Binding energy values between -20 and -77 kJ/mol obtained from MM-PBSA calculations further confirmed the high affinities of the eight inhibitors for their respective receptors. The outcome of this study holds great promise to enhance biofilms that are central to biotechnological processes associated with microbial electrochemical technologies, wastewater treatment, bioremediation and the industrial production of value-added products.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm-antagonistic proteins; Biofilms; In silico; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34546549     DOI: 10.1007/s11030-021-10320-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Divers        ISSN: 1381-1991            Impact factor:   3.364


  34 in total

Review 1.  Bap: a family of surface proteins involved in biofilm formation.

Authors:  Iñigo Lasa; José R Penadés
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  Helix Cracking Regulates the Critical Interaction between RetS and GacS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jordan M Mancl; William K Ray; Rich F Helm; Florian D Schubot
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Glycoside Hydrolase PslG Reveals That Its Levels Are Critical for Psl Polysaccharide Biosynthesis and Biofilm Formation.

Authors:  Perrin Baker; Gregory B Whitfield; Preston J Hill; Dustin J Little; Matthew J Pestrak; Howard Robinson; Daniel J Wozniak; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Subminimal inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) of antibiotic induces electroactive biofilm formation in bioelectrochemical systems.

Authors:  Lean Zhou; Tian Li; Jingkun An; Chengmei Liao; Nan Li; Xin Wang
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Characterization of the Direct Interaction between Hybrid Sensor Kinases PA1611 and RetS That Controls Biofilm Formation and the Type III Secretion System in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Anjali Y Bhagirath; Sai P Pydi; Yanqi Li; Chen Lin; Weina Kong; Prashen Chelikani; Kangmin Duan
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.084

6.  Insights into the nature of DNA binding of AbrB-like transcription factors.

Authors:  Daniel M Sullivan; Benjamin G Bobay; Douglas J Kojetin; Richele J Thompson; Mark Rance; Mark A Strauch; John Cavanagh
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Structure and organisation of SinR, the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Vicki L Colledge; Mark J Fogg; Vladimir M Levdikov; Andrew Leech; Eleanor J Dodson; Anthony J Wilkinson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The transcription factor AmrZ utilizes multiple DNA binding modes to recognize activator and repressor sequences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes.

Authors:  Edward E Pryor; Elizabeth A Waligora; Binjie Xu; Sheri Dellos-Nolan; Daniel J Wozniak; Thomas Hollis
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates.

Authors:  Nasib Qureshi; Bassam A Annous; Thaddeus C Ezeji; Patrick Karcher; Ian S Maddox
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq reveal an AmrZ-mediated mechanism for cyclic di-GMP synthesis and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Christopher J Jones; David Newsom; Benjamin Kelly; Yasuhiko Irie; Laura K Jennings; Binjie Xu; Dominique H Limoli; Joe J Harrison; Matthew R Parsek; Peter White; Daniel J Wozniak
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  1 in total

1.  Beneficial Biofilms: a Minireview of Strategies To Enhance Biofilm Formation for Biotechnological Applications.

Authors:  Mayur Mukhi; A S Vishwanathan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.005

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.