Narges Dastmalchi1, Samaneh Tayefeh-Gholami1, Ali Rajabi1, Reza Safaralizadeh2. 1. Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. Safaralizadeh@tabrizu.ac.ir.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: lncRNAs are modulatory factors with critical function in the tumorigenesis pathways, introducing them as promising therapeutic and diagnostic biomarkers for different cancers. This study is thus aimed to evaluate the differences in PVT1 and ZFAS1 gene expression in tumorous tissues as compared with adjacent healthy non-tumorous biopsies of gastric cancer cases. METHODS: One hundred two pairs of tumorous and adjacent non-tumorous biopsies of GC cases were sampled. RNA isolation and cDNA production were carried out. The qRT-PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of PVT1 and ZFAS1 genes. Moreover, the associations between PVT1 or ZFAS1 and clinicopathological characteristics as well as the biomarker roles of the lncRNAs were assessed. RESULTS: The PVT1 and ZFAS1 expressions showed a significant increase and decrease in GC samples as compared with non-cancerous tissues, respectively. PVT1 expression was significantly associated with and lymph-node involvement (p = 0.0007). Moreover, ZFAS1 expression demonstrated a significant association with lymph-node involvement (p = 0.0005), and tumor size >5 cm (p = 0.003). The findings of the ROC curve revealed that PVT1 and ZFAS1 may act as a possible biomarker with AUC of 0.71 and 0.79, specificity of 78.43% and 79.41%, and sensitivity of 55.88% and 64.71%. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding upregulation of PVT1 and downregulation of ZFAS1 in human GC samples, these genes may respectively act as oncogenic and tumor-suppressive factors in GC cases. Furthermore, PVT1 and ZFAS1 can be considered as possible biomarkers for the detection and treatment of GC cases.
BACKGROUND: lncRNAs are modulatory factors with critical function in the tumorigenesis pathways, introducing them as promising therapeutic and diagnostic biomarkers for different cancers. This study is thus aimed to evaluate the differences in PVT1 and ZFAS1 gene expression in tumorous tissues as compared with adjacent healthy non-tumorous biopsies of gastric cancer cases. METHODS: One hundred two pairs of tumorous and adjacent non-tumorous biopsies of GC cases were sampled. RNA isolation and cDNA production were carried out. The qRT-PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of PVT1 and ZFAS1 genes. Moreover, the associations between PVT1 or ZFAS1 and clinicopathological characteristics as well as the biomarker roles of the lncRNAs were assessed. RESULTS: The PVT1 and ZFAS1 expressions showed a significant increase and decrease in GC samples as compared with non-cancerous tissues, respectively. PVT1 expression was significantly associated with and lymph-node involvement (p = 0.0007). Moreover, ZFAS1 expression demonstrated a significant association with lymph-node involvement (p = 0.0005), and tumor size >5 cm (p = 0.003). The findings of the ROC curve revealed that PVT1 and ZFAS1 may act as a possible biomarker with AUC of 0.71 and 0.79, specificity of 78.43% and 79.41%, and sensitivity of 55.88% and 64.71%. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding upregulation of PVT1 and downregulation of ZFAS1 in human GC samples, these genes may respectively act as oncogenic and tumor-suppressive factors in GC cases. Furthermore, PVT1 and ZFAS1 can be considered as possible biomarkers for the detection and treatment of GC cases.