Benjamin A Babst1,2, Abhijit Karve3,4, Anthony Sementilli3,5,6, Ismail Dweikat7, David M Braun8. 1. Biological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973-5000, USA. babst@uamont.edu. 2. Arkansas Forest Resources Center, and College of Forestry, Ag. and Natural Resources, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR, 71656, USA. babst@uamont.edu. 3. Biological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973-5000, USA. 4. Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA. 5. Department of Physical Sciences, St Joseph's College, Patchogue, NY, 11772, USA. 6. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. 7. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0915, USA. 8. Divisions of Plant and Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: A greater rate of phloem unloading and storage in the stem, not a higher rate of sugar production by photosynthesis or sugar export from leaves, is the main factor that results in sugar accumulation in sweet dwarf sorghum compared to grain sorghum. At maturity, the stem internodes of sweet sorghum varieties accumulate high concentrations of fermentable sugars and represent an efficient feedstock for bioethanol production. Although stem sugar accumulation is a heritable trait, additional factors that drive sugar accumulation in sorghum have not been identified. To identify the constraints on stem sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum, we used a combination of carbon-11 (11C) radiotracer, physiological and biochemical approaches, and compared a grain sorghum and sweet dwarf sorghum line that have similar growth characteristics including height. Photosynthesis did not increase during development or differ between the sorghum lines. During the developmental transition to the reproductive stage, export of 11C from leaves approximately doubled in both sorghum lines, but 11C export in the sweet dwarf line did not exceed that of the grain sorghum. Defoliation to manipulate relative sink demand did not result in increased photosynthetic rates, indicating that the combined accumulation of C by all sink tissues was limited by the maximum photosynthetic capacity of source leaves. Nearly 3/4 of the 11C exported from leaves was transported to the lower stem in sweet sorghum within 2 h, whereas in grain sorghum nearly 3/4 of the 11C was in the panicle. Accordingly, the transcripts of several sucrose transporter (SUT) genes were more abundant in the stem internodes of the sweet dwarf line compared to the grain sorghum. Overall, these results indicate that sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum stems is influenced by the interplay of different sink tissues for the same sugars, but is likely driven by elevated sugar phloem unloading and uptake capacity in mature stem internodes.
MAIN CONCLUSION: A greater rate of phloem unloading and storage in the stem, not a higher rate of sugar production by photosynthesis or sugar export from leaves, is the main factor that results in sugar accumulation in sweet dwarf sorghum compared to grain sorghum. At maturity, the stem internodes of sweet sorghum varieties accumulate high concentrations of fermentable sugars and represent an efficient feedstock for bioethanol production. Although stem sugar accumulation is a heritable trait, additional factors that drive sugar accumulation in sorghum have not been identified. To identify the constraints on stem sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum, we used a combination of carbon-11 (11C) radiotracer, physiological and biochemical approaches, and compared a grain sorghum and sweet dwarf sorghum line that have similar growth characteristics including height. Photosynthesis did not increase during development or differ between the sorghum lines. During the developmental transition to the reproductive stage, export of 11C from leaves approximately doubled in both sorghum lines, but 11C export in the sweet dwarf line did not exceed that of the grain sorghum. Defoliation to manipulate relative sink demand did not result in increased photosynthetic rates, indicating that the combined accumulation of C by all sink tissues was limited by the maximum photosynthetic capacity of source leaves. Nearly 3/4 of the 11C exported from leaves was transported to the lower stem in sweet sorghum within 2 h, whereas in grain sorghum nearly 3/4 of the 11C was in the panicle. Accordingly, the transcripts of several sucrose transporter (SUT) genes were more abundant in the stem internodes of the sweet dwarf line compared to the grain sorghum. Overall, these results indicate that sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum stems is influenced by the interplay of different sink tissues for the same sugars, but is likely driven by elevated sugar phloem unloading and uptake capacity in mature stem internodes.
Authors: R Frank Baker; Kristen A Leach; Nathanial R Boyer; Michael J Swyers; Yoselin Benitez-Alfonso; Tara Skopelitis; Anding Luo; Anne Sylvester; David Jackson; David M Braun Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Margaret Bezrutczyk; Thomas Hartwig; Marc Horschman; Si Nian Char; Jinliang Yang; Bing Yang; Wolf B Frommer; Davide Sosso Journal: New Phytol Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Dohyun Kim; David L Alexoff; Mike Schueller; Ben Babst; Richard Ferrieri; Joanna S Fowler; David J Schlyer Journal: Appl Radiat Isot Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Malleswari Gelli; Sharon E Mitchell; Kan Liu; Thomas E Clemente; Donald P Weeks; Chi Zhang; David R Holding; Ismail M Dweikat Journal: BMC Plant Biol Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.215
Authors: Saadia Bihmidine; Charles T Hunter; Christine E Johns; Karen E Koch; David M Braun Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Abhijit A Karve; David Alexoff; Dohyun Kim; Michael J Schueller; Richard A Ferrieri; Benjamin A Babst Journal: BMC Plant Biol Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 4.215