Literature DB >> 34545536

The role of self-evaluated pain sensitivity as a mediator of objectively measured pain tolerance in Native Americans: findings from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP).

Erin N Ross1, Tyler A Toledo1, Felicitas Huber1, Parker A Kell1, Natalie Hellman1, Joanna O Shadlow1, Jamie L Rhudy2.   

Abstract

Native Americans (NAs) are at increased risk for chronic pain. One mechanism contributing to this pain disparity could be personal pain beliefs, which may influence actual pain sensitivity. Thus, we examined whether self-evaluated pain sensitivity (SEPS) mediates the relationship between ethnicity [NAs vs. non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs)] and objectively-measured pain tolerance, and whether catastrophic thinking and pain-related anxiety influence these pain beliefs. 232 healthy, pain-free NAs and NHWs completed questionnaires measuring SEPS, catastrophizing, and anxiety. Objective pain tolerance was also assessed. Results suggested: (1) NAs reported higher levels of SEPS, catastrophizing, and anxiety, (2) catastrophizing may have enhanced anxiety and both catastrophizing and anxiety were associated with higher SEPS, and (3) anxiety and SEPS were associated with lower pain tolerance. A significant bootstrapped mediation analysis suggested NAs experienced higher pain-related anxiety, which may have promoted higher SEPS, that in turn reduced pain tolerance. Longitudinal research is needed to confirm this.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catastrophizing; Chronic pain; Native American; Pain-related anxiety; Self-evaluated pain sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34545536     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-021-00257-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  46 in total

1.  Ethnic differences in the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR).

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Christopher R France; Michael E Robinson; Henrietta L Logan; Gary R Geffken; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Sex differences in perceived pain are affected by an anxious brain.

Authors:  Philippe Goffaux; Karine Michaud; Janou Gaudreau; Philippe Chalaye; Pierre Rainville; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

Review 4.  Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  E J Bartley; R B Fillingim
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Ethnic differences in responses to multiple experimental pain stimuli.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Robert R Edwards; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Pain related recall predicts future pain report.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gedney; Henrietta Logan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.

Authors:  D J Buysse; C F Reynolds; T H Monk; S R Berman; D J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Predictors of short-term and long-term memory of sensory and affective dimensions of pain.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gedney; Henrietta Logan; Robert S Baron
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Memory for stress-associated acute pain.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gedney; Henrietta Logan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Outcome Measure of Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: Validation Study of the Iranian version of Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Shahzadi; Hossain Nayeb Aghaei; Hassan Reza Mohammadi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.