Literature DB >> 34544761

Unsupervised Methods for Detection of Neural States: Case Study of Hippocampal-Amygdala Interactions.

Francesco Cocina1, Andreas Vitalis2, Amedeo Caflisch2.   

Abstract

The hippocampus and amygdala are functionally coupled brain regions that play a crucial role in processes involving memory and learning. Because interareal communication has been reported both during specific sleep stages and in awake, behaving animals, these brain regions can serve as an archetype to establish that measuring functional interactions is important for comprehending neural systems. To this end, we analyze here a public dataset of local field potentials (LFPs) recorded in rats simultaneously from the hippocampus and amygdala during different behaviors. Employing a specific, time-lagged embedding technique, named topological causality (TC), we infer directed interactions between the LFP band powers of the two regions across six frequency bands in a time-resolved manner. The combined power and interaction signals are processed with our own unsupervised tools developed originally for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations to effectively visualize and identify putative, neural states that are visited by the animals repeatedly. Our proposed methodology minimizes impositions onto the data, such as isolating specific epochs, or averaging across externally annotated behavioral stages, and succeeds in separating internal states by external labels such as sleep or stimulus events. We show that this works better for two of the three rats we analyzed, and highlight the need to acknowledge individuality in analyses of this type. Importantly, we demonstrate that the quantification of functional interactions is a significant factor in discriminating these external labels, and we suggest our methodology as a general tool for large, multisite recordings.
Copyright © 2021 Cocina et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amygdala; hippocampus; interactions; local field potential; neural states; unsupervised methods

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34544761      PMCID: PMC8577062          DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0484-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  eNeuro        ISSN: 2373-2822


  78 in total

1.  Amygdalar and hippocampal theta rhythm synchronization during fear memory retrieval.

Authors:  Thomas Seidenbecher; T Rao Laxmi; Oliver Stork; Hans-Christian Pape
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Coherent amygdalocortical theta promotes fear memory consolidation during paradoxical sleep.

Authors:  Daniela Popa; Sevil Duvarci; Andrei T Popescu; Clément Léna; Denis Paré
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Gamma oscillations coordinate amygdalo-rhinal interactions during learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Bauer; Rony Paz; Denis Paré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A Gen Phys       Date:  1986-02

Review 5.  Hippocampal ripples and memory consolidation.

Authors:  Gabrielle Girardeau; Michaël Zugaro
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Unsupervised identification of states from voltage recordings of neural networks.

Authors:  Davide Garolini; Andreas Vitalis; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Fear and safety engage competing patterns of theta-gamma coupling in the basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Joseph M Stujenske; Ekaterina Likhtik; Mihir A Topiwala; Joshua A Gordon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Extracting neuronal functional network dynamics via adaptive Granger causality analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Sheikhattar; Sina Miran; Ji Liu; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma; Patrick O Kanold; Behtash Babadi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Rosalyn Moran; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.