Literature DB >> 34544264

Characterization of Symptoms after Radical Prostatectomy and Their Relation to Postoperative Complications.

Matthew B Clements1, Amy L Tin2, Connie L Estes1, Ghalib Jibara1, Priyanka K Desai3, Behfar Ehdaie1, Karim A Touijer1, Peter T Scardino1, James A Eastham1, Melissa J Assel2, Andrew J Vickers2, Brett A Simon3,4,5, Vincent P Laudone1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many patients will experience symptoms in the initial days after radical prostatectomy (RP), but early patient-reported symptoms have not been well characterized. Our objective was to illustrate the pattern of symptoms experienced after RP and the relation of severe symptoms to postoperative complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2016, electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring began at our institution's ambulatory surgery center. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with minimally invasive RP who were sent a daily questionnaire completed using a web interface until postoperative day 10. Severe symptoms automatically generate a "yellow alert," which messages the clinic, while very severe symptoms generate a "red alert," additionally prompting the patient to call. We summarized rates of moderate-to-very severe symptoms and fit local polynomial regressions. We compared rates of 30-day or 90-day complications (grade ≥2) based on the presence of alert symptoms.
RESULTS: Of 2,266 men undergoing RP, 1,942 (86%) completed surveys. Among moderate-to-very severe symptom levels, pain (72%) and dyspnea (11%) were most common. Pain, nausea and dyspnea consistently decreased over time; fever and vomiting had a flat pattern. In patients experiencing red-alert symptoms, we observed a higher risk of 30-day complications, but rates were low and differences between groups were nonsignificant (2.9% vs 1.9%; difference 1.1%; 95% CI -1.3-3.5; p=0.3). Results were similar examining 90-day complications.
CONCLUSIONS: While symptoms are common after RP, substantial improvements occur over the first 10 days. Severe or very severe symptoms conferred at most a small absolute increase in complication risk, which should be reassuring to patients and clinicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient reported outcome measures; postoperative complications; prostatectomy; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34544264      PMCID: PMC9172597          DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.600


  17 in total

1.  Development and assessment of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's Surgical Secondary Events grading system.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Luke V Selby; Mindy Sovel; Joseph J Disa; William Hoskins; Ronald Dematteo; Peter Scardino; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; S Duke Herrell; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Roxelyn G Baumgartner; Laura W Anderson; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; James A Eastham; Caroline Savage; A C Maschino; Vincent P Laudone; Christopher B Dechet; Robert A Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Short-, intermediate-, and long-term quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--does the learning curve of LRP have a negative impact on patients' quality of life?

Authors:  Stephen F Wyler; Robin Ruszat; Urs Straumann; Thomas H Forster; Maurizio Provenzano; Tullio Sulser; Thomas C Gasser; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A 5-Item Frailty Index for Predicting Morbidity and Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Mohammed Shahait; Muhieddine Labban; Ryan W Dobbs; Joseph G Cheaib; David I Lee; Hani Tamim; Albert El-Hajj
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Complex Cancer Surgery in the Outpatient Setting: The Josie Robertson Surgery Center.

Authors:  Hanae Tokita; Rebecca Twersky; Vincent Laudone; Marcia Levine; Daniel Stein; Peter Scardino; Brett A Simon
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Javier Miller; Angela Smith; Erik Kouba; Eric Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Validated Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Beyond Continence and Erections.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Fouad Aoun; Thierry Quackels; Grégoire Assenmacher; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun

10.  Association Between Electronic Patient Symptom Reporting With Alerts and Potentially Avoidable Urgent Care Visits After Ambulatory Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Brett A Simon; Melissa J Assel; Amy L Tin; Priyanka Desai; Cara Stabile; Roberta H Baron; Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Rebecca S Twersky; Andrew J Vickers; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 16.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.