| Literature DB >> 34541279 |
Abstract
Over the past decade, nighttime lights have become a widely used proxy for measuring economic activity. This paper examines the potential for high frequency nighttime lights data to provide "near real-time" tracking of the economic impacts of the COVID-19 crisis in Morocco. At the national level, there exists a statistically significant correlation between quarterly movements in Morocco's overall nighttime light intensity and movements in its real GDP. This finding supports the cautious use of lights data to track the economic impacts of the COVID-19 crisis at higher temporal frequencies and at the subnational and city levels, for which GDP data are unavailable. Relative to its pre-COVID-19 trend growth path of lights, Morocco experienced a large drop in the overall intensity of its lights in March 2020 following the country's first COVID-19 case and the introduction of strict lockdown measures, from which it has subsequently struggled to recover. At the subnational and city levels, while all regions and cities examined shared in March's national decline in nighttime light intensity, some suffered much larger declines than others. Since then, the relative effects of the COVID-19 shock across regions and cities appear to have largely persisted. Notwithstanding these findings, however, further research is required to ascertain the exact causes of the observed changes in light intensity and to fully verify that the results are driven by anthropogenic causes.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Economic activity; Morocco; Near real-time monitoring; Nighttime lights
Year: 2021 PMID: 34541279 PMCID: PMC8440142 DOI: 10.1016/j.deveng.2021.100067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dev Eng ISSN: 2352-7285
Fig. 1Nighttime light intensity in March 2020 in the vicinity of Casablanca and surrounding secondary cities based on the four different masks: (a) cluster mask; (b) EOG mask; (c) population mask; and (d) built-up area mask.
Relationship between nighttime lights and GDP, quarterly data.
| Time trend | Time trend + quarter effects | Year effects | Year + quarter effects | De-trended (time trend) | De-trended (year effects) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1a] | [1b] | [2a] | [2b] | [3a] | [3b] | |
| ln(SOL) | 0.025 | 0.020 | 0.083 | 0.006 | 0.025 | 0.083 |
| R2 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| ln(SOL) | 0.129** | 0.088*** | 0.295*** | 0.051** | 0.129** | 0.295*** |
| R2 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.13 | 0.37 |
| ln (SOL) | 0.100** | 0.06*** | 0.262*** | 0.035 | 0.100** | 0.262*** |
| R2 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.11 | 0.35 |
| ln (SOL) | 0.109* | 0.089*** | 0.250*** | 0.051** | 0.109* | 0.250*** |
| R2 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.10 | 0.29 |
| ln (SOL) | 0.082 | 0.087*** | 0.197 | 0.052*** | 0.082 | 0.197* |
| R2 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
Notes: ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1, 5 and 10 percent levels respectively. t-values are reported in parentheses and are based on Newey-West standard errors, assuming a first-order serial correlation process. Estimated constant terms in the regressions not reported.
Fig. 2a. Relationship between nighttime lights and GDP, EOG mask. Fig. 2b. Relationship between nighttime lights and GDP, cluster mask.
Fig. 3Conceptual illustration of estimation of effects of COVID-19 on nighttime light intensity.
Nighttime lights statistics.
| Difference from trend (%) | ||||||
| 3.00 | −7.88** | −10.92*** | −4.58** | −11.55*** | −7.03** | −7.34*** |
| −10.88 | −3.03 | 6.34 | −6.97 | 4.52 | −0.32 | |
| Y | ||||||
| 1.47 | −13.44 | −12.00 | −7.05 | −6.49 | 2.94 | −6.25 |
Notes: ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1, 5 and 10 percent levels respectively. Results based on EOG mask, which omits areas excluded in 2015 and 2016 annual composites. Trend refers to the pre-COVID-19 trend of seasonally adjusted SOL, as estimated using monthly data for Apr. 2012–Feb. 2020. No results reported for June 2020 due to stray-light contamination of lights data.
Fig. 4Changes in seasonally adjusted NTL intensity.
Fig. 5Confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths.
Fig. 6NPI stringency index.
Changes in light intensity relative to pre-COVID-19 trend (percentage points), Admin-1 regions.
| Admin-1 unit | Change from previous month, percentage points ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March | April | May | July | August | Sept. | |
| Rabat – Salé – Kénitra | −11.95 | −3.11 | 3.58 | −15.60 | 11.23 | −10.14 |
| Tanger – Tetouan - Al Hoceima | −15.33 | −3.76 | 7.13 | −6.98 | 3.40 | −6.52 |
| Fès – Meknès | −16.49 | −11.79 | 13.47 | −4.47 | 1.36 | −1.27 |
| Béni Mellal – Khénifra | −7.42 | −9.97 | 8.37 | −2.28 | 0.90 | −1.57 |
| Oriental – RIF | −15.28 | −2.65 | 12.41 | −7.82 | 3.78 | 3.18 |
| Marrakech – Safi | −11.62 | −6.92 | 11.76 | −4.08 | 3.16 | 1.69 |
| Drâa – Tafilalet | −11.65 | 7.26 | 1.20 | −6.10 | −0.87 | 5.21 |
| Casablanca – Settat | −6.49 | 4.90 | −3.72 | −4.78 | 8.59 | 2.67 |
| Souss – Massa | −0.53 | −7.88 | 13.66 | −8.18 | −4.23 | 12.75 |
Notes: Admin-1 area boundaries conform to current regional boundaries based on the shapefile downloaded from: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=21bcbcaa915c433ba7c7850bafeede7b. No results reported for June 2020 due to stray-light contamination of the lights data.
Fig. 7Changes in light intensity relative to pre-COVID-19 trend (percentage points), Admin-1 areas.
Changes in light intensity relative to pre-COVID-19 trend (percentage points), cities with 2015 population > 200,000.
| Change from previous month, percentage points ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | Admin-1 unit | March | April | May | July | August | Sept. |
| Tangier | Tanger – Tetouan - Al Hoceima | −23.76 | −6.53 | 10.33 | −2.86 | −3.32 | −11.18 |
| Rabat | Rabat – Salé – Kénitra | −12.27 | −2.93 | 2.04 | −21.30 | 16.88 | −14.07 |
| Fez | Fès – Meknès | −23.23 | −14.94 | 10.31 | −4.14 | 4.68 | −0.52 |
| Meknes | Fès – Meknès | −17.67 | −13.27 | 9.54 | 2.20 | −0.45 | −6.84 |
| Kénitra | Rabat – Salé – Kénitra | −17.64 | 1.87 | 4.82 | −15.27 | 16.27 | −11.70 |
| Khouribga | Béni Mellal – Khénifra | −14.87 | −4.21 | 7.92 | 2.61 | 3.01 | −11.03 |
| Marrakesh | Marrakech – Safi | −12.45 | −17.05 | 12.92 | −6.76 | 3.81 | 2.95 |
| Tetouan | Tanger – Tetouan - Al Hoceima | −12.03 | −5.91 | −2.33 | −10.36 | 28.39 | −11.46 |
| Oujda | Oriental – RIF | −15.82 | −22.43 | 31.14 | 1.85 | −7.12 | 6.72 |
| El Jadida | Casablanca – Settat | −13.51 | 3.15 | −4.31 | 3.36 | 3.59 | 7.14 |
| Nador | Oriental – RIF | −10.47 | −4.50 | 0.59 | 4.44 | 6.57 | 4.81 |
| Casablanca | Casablanca – Settat | −9.70 | 11.08 | −4.62 | −9.39 | 10.65 | 3.62 |
| Safi | Marrakech – Safi | −7.72 | −7.15 | 4.21 | 12.75 | 2.81 | −2.45 |
| Agadir | Souss – Massa | −1.27 | −3.59 | 10.21 | −8.50 | −5.02 | 17.31 |
Notes: Each city is defined as an “urban center” following the European Commission's degree of urbanization methodology (Dijkstra and Poelman, 2014; Dijkstra et al., 2021). Table is restricted to urban centers with a population of more than 200,000 in 2015.
Relationship between nighttime lights and GDP generated by different sectors, quarterly data (2012 Q3 – 2020 Q1).
| Time trend | Time trend + quarter effects | Year effects | Year + quarter effects | De-trended (time trend) | De-trended (year effects) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1a] | [1b] | [2a] | [2b] | [3a] | [3b] | |
| ln (SOL) | 0.143 | 0.051 | 0.453*** | 0.173** | 0.143 | 0.453*** |
| R2 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.07 | 0.49 |
| ln (SOL) | −0.057 | −0.078* | 0.141*** | −0.015 | −0.057 | 0.141*** |
| R2 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.05 | 0.23 |
| ln (SOL) | 0.460** | 0.533** | 0.026 | 0.159 | 0.460*** | 0.026 |
| R2 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.12 | 0.00 |
| ln (SOL) | 0.143* | 0.063 | 0.413*** | 0.149* | 0.143* | 0.413*** |
| R2 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.10 | 0.48 |
| ln (SOL) | −0.013 | −0.03 | 0.137*** | −0.002 | −0.013 | 0.137*** |
| R2 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.252 |
| ln (SOL) | 0.335* | 0.398** | −0.052 | 0.032 | 0.335* | −0.05 |
| R2 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
Notes: ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1, 5 and 10 percent levels respectively. t-values are reported in parentheses and are based on Newey-West standard errors, assuming a first-order serial correlation process. Estimated constant terms in the regressions not reported.
Full results from estimation of equation (4).
| Dependent variable: | |
|---|---|
| EOG mask | |
| Time trend | 0.005*** |
| March | −0.079** |
| April | −0.109*** |
| May | −0.046** |
| July | −0.115*** |
| August | −0.070** |
| Sept. | −0.073*** |
| Constant | 13.411*** |
| 0.868 | |
| 7.73*** | |
| 93 | |
Notes: ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1, 5 and 10 percent levels respectively. t-values are reported in parentheses and are based on Newey-West standard errors, assuming a first-order serial correlation process. F(12, 75) refers to an F-test of the joint significance of all explanatory variables with 12 and 75 degrees of freedom. Regressions also include month dummies (estimated co-efficients not reported) but exclude June data due to stray-light contamination of the data. EOG mask excludes areas excluded in 2015 and 2016 annual VIIRS composites.