| Literature DB >> 34540784 |
Aihong Liu1, Yuhua Kuang2, Ruiping Huang3, Qunying Ge4.
Abstract
Objective: This study is to assess the application value of information-based health education and continuity of care in patients with PU (peptic ulcer).Entities:
Keywords: SF-36; continuity of care; information-based health education; peptic ulcer; self-rating anxiety scale
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34540784 PMCID: PMC8440824 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.694128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups of patients [n (%)].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 15 (25.86) | 36 (62.07) | 7 (12.07) | 51 (87.93) |
| Observation group ( | 26 (44.83) | 31 (53.45) | 1 (1.72) | 57 (98.28) |
| χ2 | 4.833 | |||
|
| 0.028 |
Figure 1Comparison of health knowledge mastery between two groups of patients.
Comparison of Exercise of Self-Care Agency (ESCA) scores between the two groups of patients (x̄ ± s, points).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 19.37 ± 3.24 | 18.52 ± 3.08 | 23.78 ± 3.26 | 41.39 ± 4.52 | 103.28 ± 10.15 |
| Observation group ( | 23.54 ± 4.10 | 21.69 ± 4.13 | 27.31 ± 4.58 | 50.03 ± 4.37 | 126.54 ± 11.48 |
|
| 6.077 | 4.686 | 4.782 | 10.470 | 11.560 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of medication compliance between the two groups of patients [n (%)].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 25 (43.10) | 23 (39.66) | 10 (17.24) | 48 (82.76) |
| Observation group ( | 39 (67.24) | 17 (31.03) | 2 (3.45) | 56 (96.55) |
| χ2 | 5.949 | |||
|
| 0.015 |
Comparison of MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores in each dimension between the two groups of patients (x̄ ± s, points).
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| PF | 72.54 ± 10.12 | 71.75 ± 10.46 | 0.413 | 0.680 | 79.17 ± 10.62 | 85.64 ± 10.77 | 3.258 | 0.002 |
| RP | 64.18 ± 8.93 | 65.23 ± 9.04 | 0.629 | 0.530 | 69.36 ± 9.41 | 75.59 ± 10.58 | 3.351 | 0.001 |
| BP | 64.15 ± 10.01 | 64.05 ± 9.73 | 0.055 | 0.957 | 68.59 ± 10.27 | 76.35 ± 10.92 | 3.942 | <0.001 |
| GH | 51.69 ± 10.17 | 52.31 ± 9.45 | 0.340 | 0.734 | 58.25 ± 10.64 | 64.83 ± 11.16 | 3.250 | 0.002 |
| VT | 48.92 ± 7.35 | 47.63 ± 7.15 | 0.958 | 0.340 | 52.87 ± 8.05 | 61.27 ± 9.46 | 5.150 | <0.001 |
| SF | 49.12 ± 8.15 | 50.07 ± 8.34 | 0.620 | 0.536 | 57.36 ± 9.11 | 66.89 ± 9.83 | 5.415 | <0.001 |
| RE | 54.71 ± 9.04 | 53.91 ± 9.13 | 0.474 | 0.636 | 61.85 ± 9.65 | 72.54 ± 11.05 | 5.549 | <0.001 |
| MH | 43.19 ± 8.68 | 44.28 ± 8.57 | 0.681 | 0.498 | 53.43 ± 9.25 | 65.49 ± 10.97 | 6.401 | <0.001 |
Comparison of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores between the two groups of patients (x̄±s, points).
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control group ( | 53.24 ± 10.11 | 47.62 ± 9.94 | 3.019 | 0.003 | 55.38 ± 12.67 | 48.72 ± 12.09 | 2.896 | 0.005 |
| Observation group ( | 52.71 ± 9.83 | 40.16 ± 9.01 | 7.168 | <0.001 | 54.93 ± 12.36 | 43.05 ± 11.21 | 5.422 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.286 | 4.235 | 0.194 | 2.619 | ||||
|
| 0.775 | <0.001 | 0.847 | 0.010 |
Figure 2Comparison of nursing satisfaction between two groups of patients.