| Literature DB >> 34540657 |
Kai Gan1, Yue Gao2, Kuangzheng Liu2, Bin Xu2, Weijun Qin1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) is highly expressed in multiple malignancies and associated with patients' prognosis, but its role in bladder cancer (BCa) remains elusive. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the clinical significance and prognostic value of HER2 in BCa.Entities:
Keywords: HER2; bladder cancer; clinical significance; meta-analysis; prognostic value
Year: 2021 PMID: 34540657 PMCID: PMC8440975 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.653491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Extracted data of included studies.
| Reference | Method | Number | Age | Male% | Follow-up (months) | Tumor type | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ding et al. ( | IHC>10% | 238 | 68 (Median) | 81.9 | 47 (median) | non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) | Tumor size; recurrence; progression; grade |
| Kolla et al. ( | IHC>10% | 90 | 58 (mean) | 95.6 | 46 (median) | muscle invasive urinary bladder cancer | grade; lymph node metastasis |
| Krüger et al. ( | IHC>10% | 138 | 64 (Median) | 80.4 | 53 (mean) | muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma | grade; lymph node metastasis |
| Lim et al. ( | IHC≥50% | 141 | 68.9 (mean) | 86.5 | 73.3 (mean) | non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer | progression; recurrence; tumor size; grade |
| Hegazy et al. ( | IHC>20% | 88 | not specific | not specific | 36 (median) | non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancer | tumor recurrence and progression; grade |
| Paul et al. ( | IHC>30% | 178 | 71 (mean) | not specific | 82 (mean) | non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer | Recurrence; progression |
| El et al. ( | IHC>30% | 103 | 63 (Median) | 93.2 | not specific | non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer | Tumor size; Tumor grade |
| Inoue et al. ( | IHC>10% | 95 | not specific | 72.6 | 36 (median) | muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma | recurrence condition |
| Behnsawy et al. ( | IHC>10% | 161 | not specific | 85.1 | not specific | non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer | recurrence condition |
| Olsson et al. ( | IHC>30% | 201 | 73 (Median) | 83 | 58 (median) | non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer | tumor size, multiplicity, possible presence of histologically proven recurrence and progression; grade |
| Moustakas et al. ( | IHC>10% | 48 | 68 (mean) | 97.3 | not specific | non-muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder | Grade at diagnosis; recurrence-free survival (RFS) |
| Soria et al. ( | IHC>30% | 354 | 66.3 (Median) | 81 | 123 (mean) | muscle invasive and very high-risk non–muscle invasive bladder cancer | oncological outcomes; grade |
| Bolenz et al. ( | IHC>10% | 198 | 66.7 (Median) | 78.8 | 48.7 (mean) | non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer | recurrence; lymph node metastasis; grade |
| Abdelrahman et al. ( | IHC>30% | 60 | 52 (Median) | 71.70 | 44(mean) | Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) | tumor recurrence, progression, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS); grade |
IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale of the included literature.
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis (study adjusts for age*, sex*) | Assessment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdelrahman et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | — | 8 |
| Bolenz et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | — | 8 |
| Soria et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Moustakas et al. ( | — | * | * | * | ** | * | — | * | 7 |
| Olsson et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | — | 8 |
| Behnsawy et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | — | * | 8 |
| Inoue et al. ( | — | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| El et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Paul et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Hegazy et al. ( | — | * | * | * | ** | * | * | — | 7 |
| Lim et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Krüger et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | — | 8 |
| Kolla et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Ding et al. ( | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
*The result of this item is positive. **There are two positive results. —The result of this item is negative.
Figure 1Study selection flowchart.
Figure 2Forest plots describing the correction of HER2 protein expression with gender (A), carcinoma in situ (B), multifocal tumors (C) and large tumor size (D). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Forest plots describing the correction of HER2 protein expression with stage (A), grade (B), lymph node metastases (C) and lymph vascular invasion (D). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4Forest plots describing the correction of HER2 protein expression with recurrence (A), progression (B), 2-year RFS (C), recurrence in NMIBC (D), 2-year RFS in NMIBC (E). RFS, recurrence-free survival; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5TCGA analysis of differences about HER2 gene expression between cancer and normal tissues (A), stage III and IV (B), male and female (C), N0 and N1&2 tumor (D), LVI and no-LVI (E) and subtypes (F). Survival conditions were also compared: overall survival (G), disease specific survival (H) and progress free interval (I). ERBB2: HER2, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2; LVI, lymph vascular invasion; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 6Funnel plots of meta analysis.