| Literature DB >> 34540192 |
Min Wang1, Rong Rong2, Ke Jia3, Jing Li4, Zhuohui Zhou3, Wenxin Ge3, Qing Zhang1.
Abstract
The development of information technology and the advancement of the process of educational informatization have provided technical support for education and education reform. The virtual simulation teaching mode is no longer a new thing for people, and it is more and more accepted by people familiar with it. Induction and analysis of short message texts generated by students' online learning can fully understand students, make effective adjustments to the classroom, guide teachers' teaching practice, and optimize the classroom, thereby improving students' learning ability, practical ability, innovation ability, and collaboration. To study the effect of virtual simulation education on improving the skills of medical students, this paper is based on video training and education of virtual reality side-cut high-simulation simulator using case analysis and literature analysis methods. It collects data from databases and builds on online education. The model was developed, and a large number of relevant pieces of literature were read and analyzed through the literature survey method. The research results show that virtual simulation teaching can effectively improve students' technical thinking and ability. Students' technical thinking and ability are about 30% higher than traditional teaching methods, and the cooperation consciousness between students reaches 0.8 consciousness, which can solve the contradiction between popularization and improvement. And to solve the problems of polarization and transformation of underachievers, students' personalities can be fully displayed and developed, and education and teaching will be on the track of quality education. This shows that training videos based on virtual reality technology can play a very good role in improving students' technical mastery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34540192 PMCID: PMC8443375 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9985041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Vulnerability mining method.
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information processing | 1.94 | 2.38 | 2.13 | 2.21 | 2.29 | 2.34 | 1.97 | 2.06 | 2.2 |
| Personality development | 2.35 | 1.8 | 2.46 | 1.97 | 2.36 | 2.03 | 1.94 | 2.2 | 1.96 |
| Social interaction | 1.99 | 2.08 | 1.98 | 1.89 | 2.09 | 2.49 | 1.8 | 2.19 | 1.94 |
| Behavior modification | 2.15 | 2.45 | 2.25 | 2.1 | 2.24 | 2.2 | 2.15 | 2.46 | 1.81 |
| Online teaching | 1.93 | 2.35 | 1.97 | 2.45 | 2.28 | 2.37 | 2.17 | 2.08 | 1.92 |
| Traditional teaching | 2 | 2.26 | 2.33 | 2.3 | 1.86 | 2.35 | 1.95 | 2.08 | 2.12 |
| Virtual reality | 2.36 | 2.13 | 2.27 | 2.3 | 2.42 | 2.46 | 2.47 | 2.63 | 2.66 |
Figure 1Changes in teaching and training methods.
Changes in different methods.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information processing | 0.08 | 0.05 | −0.37 | 0.09 | 0.06 |
| Personality development | 0.39 | −0.33 | −0.09 | 0.18 | −0.26 |
| Social interaction | 0.2 | 0.4 | −0.69 | 0.39 | −0.25 |
| Behavior modification | 0.13 | −0.04 | −0.05 | 0.31 | −0.65 |
| Online teaching | −0.27 | 0.09 | −0.2 | −0.09 | −0.16 |
| Traditional teaching | −0.44 | 0.49 | −0.4 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
Figure 2Growth trend of mining methods.
Patient SPN classification.
| Low emulation | General simulation | High-simulation person | Entity data |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optic nerve | 73.88 ± 3.77 | 78.56 ± 8.23 | 88.35 ± 5.78 | 89.26 ± 2.38 | |
| Filter | 5.69 ± 4.32 | 8.79 ± 3.58 | 17.23 ± 4.85 | 15.32 ± 3.51 | |
| Daily life | 12.34 ± 5.81 | 7.56 ± 4.25 | 8.48 ± 3.45 | 5.23 ± 2.01 | |
| Motion capture | 9.24 ± 3.52 | 13.52 ± 4.72 | 27.89 ± 5.32 | 25.34 ± 3.17 | |
| Static capture | 4.25 ± 2.35 | 9.25 ± 3.14 | 12.47 ± 4.91 | 11.37 ± 4.17 |
Figure 3Artificial human incision (from Baidu: image.baidu.com).
Figure 4Discrete effect of artificial human incision. (a) Discrete postrendering effect. (b) Cut rendering effect 1. (c) Cut rendering effect 2 (from Baidu: image.baidu.com).
Figure 5Changes of male students after teaching.
Male students after teaching.
| Teaching methods | Class | Creative thinking | Learning attitude | Learning ability | Basic ability | Painting | Cultural lessons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offline teaching | Class 1 | 2.35 | 2.01 | 1.86 | 2.15 | 2.29 | 2.11 |
| Class 2 | 1.87 | 2 | 2.04 | 1.89 | 2.11 | 2.36 | |
|
| |||||||
| General online teaching | Class 3 | 3.6 | 3.82 | 3.43 | 3.32 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Class 4 | 3.81 | 4.07 | 4.01 | 4.01 | 4.16 | 3.78 | |
|
| |||||||
| Virtual simulation teaching | Class 5 | 4.84 | 5 | 4.77 | 4.88 | 4.87 | 5.35 |
| Class 6 | 5.6 | 5.63 | 5.84 | 5.37 | 5.13 | 5.26 | |
Changes of female students after teaching.
| Teaching methods | Class | Creative thinking | Learning attitude | Learning ability | Basic ability | Painting | Cultural lessons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offline teaching | Class 1 | 3.08 | 3.16 | 2.86 | 2.73 | 2.81 | 3.39 |
| Class 2 | 3.8 | 3.81 | 3.84 | 3.57 | 3.89 | 3.24 | |
|
| |||||||
| General online teaching | Class 3 | 4.82 | 4.42 | 4.41 | 4.94 | 4.91 | 4.24 |
| Class 4 | 4.89 | 5.17 | 4.7 | 4.91 | 4.78 | 4.98 | |
|
| |||||||
| Virtual simulation online teaching | Class 5 | 6.14 | 6.22 | 5.7 | 6.13 | 5.77 | 5.89 |
| Class 6 | 6.55 | 6.82 | 6.62 | 6.3 | 6.85 | 6.42 | |
Figure 6Female students after teaching.
Attitudes towards multimedia teaching.
| Very dissatisfied | Not satisfied | General | Okay | Satisfaction | Very satisfied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 19 |
| Class 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 21 | 20 |
| Class 3 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 12 | 20 | 24 |
| Class 4 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 19 | 20 |
| Class 5 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 21 |
| Class 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 17 | 19 |
Traditional teaching satisfaction.
| Very dissatisfied | Not satisfied | General | Okay | Satisfaction | Very satisfied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | 6 | 5 | 22 | 14 | 6 | 7 |
| Class 2 | 7 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 7 | 5 |
| Class 3 | 9 | 7 | 25 | 15 | 9 | 10 |
| Class 4 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 19 | 10 | 9 |
| Class 5 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 19 | 11 | 7 |
| Class 6 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 12 |
Figure 7Traditional teaching satisfaction survey.