| Literature DB >> 34540188 |
Zitan Zhang1, Wei Li2, Huiqun Jia1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine intervention on serum inflammatory factor concentration and postoperative cognitive malfunction in elderly patients with general anesthesia. Methodology. 174 patients with general anesthesia were selected, who were categorized into a control group (HC) and a dexmedetomidine group (HS) using the random number table method, with 87 patients in individual groups. The dexmedetomidine group was pumped intravenously with dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 1 μg/kg before induction of anesthesia for 15 min, followed by continuous intravenous pumping at a rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h, and the dosing was stopped at 30 min before concluding the surgery. The control group was administered the identical dose of saline in the same manner. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) levels and MMES scores were tested at 1 h before and 24 h after anesthesia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34540188 PMCID: PMC8443369 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7161901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Comparison of general data and intraoperative conditions of each indicator between two groups of patients (χ‾ ± s).
| Groups | No. of cases | Age | Gender (M/F) | Weight (kg) | ASA grade (cases, II/III) | Education (years) | Operative time (min) | Bleeding volume (ml) | Sufentanil dosage ( | Remifentanil dosage (mg) | Isoproterenol dosage (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 87 | 71.4 ± 4.9 | 56/31 | 67 ± 8 | 71/16 | 10 ± 4 | 168 ± 53 | 406 ± 142 | 30.3 ± 3.8 | 2.38 ± 0.61 | 1485 ± 238 |
| HS | 87 | 70.6 ± 4.2 | 58/29 | 69 ± 8 | 76/11 | 11 ± 4 | 170 ± 48 | 428 ± 166 | 31.6 ± 4.2 | 2.51 ± 0.65 | 1533 ± 264 |
TNF-α and IL-6 changes of serum concentrations of both groups (n = 30).
| Indicators | Groups | Preoperative (T0) | Postoperative (T1h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TNF- | HC | 46.20 ± 9.42 | 75.74 ± 10.39 |
| HS | 45.28 ± 8.99 | 64.82 ± 9.71 | |
| IL-6(ng/L) | HC | 51.02 ± 10.19 | 86.48 ± 13.51 |
| HS | 49.44 ± 9.25# | 69.04 ± 12.14 |
P < 0.05 indicates comparing postoperative with preoperative, P < 0.05 indicates comparing both experimental and control group, and# indicates P > 0.05 when comparing both experimental and control group.
Comparing Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and incidence of postoperative POCD between two groups of patients at different time points (scores, χ‾± s).
| Groups | No. of cases | MMSE score | Incidence of POCD (cases (%)) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative (T10) | Postoperative T1(1d) | |||
| HC | 87 | 25.8 ± 0.8 | 25.6 ± 1.1 | 8(9.2) |
| HS | 87 | 26.1 ± 0.7 | 22.2 ± 1.9 | 13 (21.3) |
| 0.86 | 0.04 | 0.038 | ||
P < 0.05 indicates comparing postoperative and preoperative and P < 0.05 indicates comparing both experimental and control group.
The cases of POCD in the data segment of the two proinflammatory factor quartiles.
| Grade | No. of cases | IL-6 (ng/ml) | Incidence of POCD (cases (%)) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 22 | 57.96 (±10.06) | 0 (0.00) |
| Q2 | 22 | 65.27 (±10.62) | 1 (4.55) |
| Q3 | 22 | 70.34 (±11.82) | 2 (9.09) |
| Q4 | 21 | 83.24 (±14.82) | 5 (22.73) |
With the increase in the level of IL-6 concentration, the number of POCD increases significantly (P < 0.05).
| Grade | No. of cases | TNF- | Incidence of POCD (cases (%)) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 22 | 55.28 (±11.27) | 0 (0.00) |
| Q2 | 22 | 61.94 (±10.72) | 1 (4.55) |
| Q3 | 22 | 66.18 (±11.71) | 2 (9.09) |
| Q4 | 21 | 76.41 (±14.20) | 5 (22.73) |