| Literature DB >> 34539653 |
Christopher G Mueller1, Christian Gaiddon2, Aïna Venkatasamy2,3.
Abstract
In the light of the success and the expected growth of its arsenal, immuno-therapy may become the standard neoadjuvant procedure for many cancers in the near future. However, aspects such as the identity, organization and the activation status of the peri- and intra-tumoral immune cells would represent important elements to weigh in the decision for the appropriate treatment. While important progress in non-invasive imaging of immune cells has been made over the last decades, it falls yet short of entering the clinics, let alone becoming a standard procedure. Here, we provide an overview of the different intra-vital imaging approaches in the clinics and in pre-clinical settings and discuss their benefits and drawbacks for assessing the activity of the immune system, globally and on a cellular level. Stimulated by further research, the future is likely to see many technological advances both on signal detection and emission as well as image specificity and resolution to tackle current hurdles. We anticipate that the ability to precisely determine an immune stage of cancer will capture the attention of the oncologist and will create a change in paradigm for cancer therapy.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; imaging; immune cells; lymph node; tertiary lymphoid structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34539653 PMCID: PMC8446654 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.716860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Critical assessment of the imaging modalities for intravital immune assessment.
| Modalities (References) | Clinical uses | Lymphatic tissue | Single cells | Limitations | Advantages | Spatial resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphography ( | + | + | – | Resolution, contrast agents | LN architecture, lower cost | 10-20 mm |
| Ultrasound ( | + | + (superficial) | + (contrast agents) | Depth, contrast agents | Lower cost | 0.2-2 mm |
| CT ( | + | + | + (contrast agents) | Radiation | Depth | ~ 1 mm (clinical) |
| Lower (preclinical) | ||||||
| PET/SPECT ( | + | + | + (radioisotopes contrast agents) | Radiation, higher costs | Depth, activity quantification | ~ 4-5 mm (clinical) |
| MRI ( | + | + | + (contrast agents) | Higher costs | DepthRadiation-free | ~ 1-2 mm (clinical) |
| Lower (preclinical) | ||||||
| PA ( | + | + | + (contrast/fluorescent agents) | Clinical applications | Depth, combination with NIR/ultrasound imaging | < 5 µm |
| OCT ( | + | -/+ | – | Depth | Needle OCT | < 2 mm, depth |
| Fluorescence ( | – | -/+ | + (fluorescent probes) | Depth, clinical use | NIR, multimodalities, theranostics | NA |
NA, Not available.