Literature DB >> 34538707

RIC3 variants are not associated with Parkinson's disease in large European, Latin American, or East Asian cohorts.

Kajsa Brolin1, Sara Bandres-Ciga2, Hampton Leonard3, Mary B Makarious4, Cornelis Blauwendraat2, Ignacio F Mata5, Jia Nee Foo6, Lasse Pihlstrøm7, Maria Swanberg8, Ziv Gan-Or9, Manuela Mx Tan7.   

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder in which both rare and common genetic variants contribute to disease risk. Multiple genes have been reported to be linked to monogenic PD but these only explain a fraction of the observed familial aggregation. Rare variants in RIC3 have been suggested to be associated with PD in the Indian population. However, replication studies yielded inconsistent results. We further investigate the role of RIC3 variants in PD in European cohorts using individual-level genotyping data from 14,671 PD patients and 17,667 controls, as well as whole-genome sequencing data from 1,615 patients and 961 controls. We also investigated RIC3 using summary statistics from a Latin American cohort of 1,481 individuals, and from a cohort of 31,575 individuals of East Asian ancestry. We did not identify any association between RIC3 and PD in any of the cohorts. However, more studies of rare variants in non-European ancestry populations, in particular South Asian populations, are necessary to further evaluate the world-wide role of RIC3 in PD etiology.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics; Parkinson's disease; RIC3

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34538707      PMCID: PMC9011339          DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Aging        ISSN: 0197-4580            Impact factor:   4.673


Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, for which rhe genetic causes are largely still unknown. Variants in resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 3 (RIC3) were first identified in Indian PD patients (Sudhaman et al., 2016). A rare missense variant, p.P57T, was identified in a large Indian PD family with an autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance, where it was present in all 9 affected individuals and absent in 5 unaffected family members (Sudhaman et al., 2016). Another rare heterozygous missense RIC3 variant, p.V168L, was found in the same study through targeted screening of an independent cohort of 220 Indian PD patients and 186 controls (Sudhaman et al. 2016). However, no association was found between RIC3 variants and PD risk in later studies of French-Canadian and French cohorts (Ross et al., 2017) and a Chinese cohort (He et al., 2017). The RIC3 gene encodes for a member of the resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 3-like family. It functions as a chaperone for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, specifically the alpha-7 subunit of homomeric nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (CHRNA7). These receptors are important for promoting the release of dopamine in the nigrostriatal pathway (Gotti and Clementi, 2004; Quik and Kulak, 2002) where the degeneration and loss of dopaminergic neurons occurs in PD (Breckenridge et al., 2016; Li et al., 2015). The original study showed that both variants in RIC3 reduced the level of these receptors in mutant cell lines (Sudhaman et al., 2016). The authors suggest this is potentially through a dominant-negative effect of the mutations, as the level of CHRNA7 in the mutant cell lines was lower than in untransfected cells (Sudhaman et al., 2016). A further elaboration on the study and on RIC3 can be found in the Supplementary material. Here, we assessed the role of RIC3 variants in PD risk in several cohorts of different ethnicities: large European cohorts from the International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC) (Nalls et al., 2019) and the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease (AMP-PD) (https://amp-pd.org/). We further examined variants in RIC3 in summary statistics from 1,481 individuals from the Latin American Research consortium on the Genetics of PD (LARGE-PD) (Loesch et al., 2021), as well as from 31,575 individuals of East Asian ancestry (Foo et al., 2020).

Methods

Summary information of all cohorts can be found in Supplementary Table 1. We analyzed individual-level data from 2 large European datasets of PD patients and controls: IPDGC genome-wide genotyping data (14,671 PD patients and 17,667 controls), and AMP-PD whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data (1615 PD patients and 961 controls after quality control and removal of individuals of non-European ancestry [Supplementary methods]). Analysis and quality control of the AMP-PD dataset (release 1) were performed on the cloud-native platform Terra (https://app.terra.bio/). In each dataset, Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) analysis was performed using logistic regression in PLINK v1.9 (Chang et al., 2015). We adjusted for age at study entry, sex, and the first 10 genetic principal components (PCs). Further details can be found in the Supplementary material. In both datasets, we also assessed the burden of rare variants in RIC3, using the tests sequence Kernel association test (SKAT), optimized SKAT (SKAT-O), CMC, Zeggini, Madson-Browning, and Fp in RVTESTS version 2.1.0 (Zhan et al., 2016) under default settings (Supplementary methods). Variants were annotated using the latest available version (October 24, 2019) of ANNOVAR (Wang et al., 2010). Only variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) equal to or less than 3% were defined as rare and included for burden analysis. All code for these analyses is available at: https://github.com/ipdgc/IPDGC-Trainees/blob/master/RIC3.ipynb. Subsequently, associations between variants in RIC3 and PD were investigated in GWAS summary statistics from 2 large additional cohorts, LARGE-PD with 1481 individuals (798 cases and 683 controls) (Loesch et al., 2021), and an Asian PD case-control cohort (Foo et al., 2020). The Asian PD GWAS included 31,575 individuals (6724 PD patients and 24,851 controls) from East Asia, including Singapore/Malaysia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, mainland China, and South Korea (Foo et al., 2020). LocusZoom plots were generated using the LocalZoom tool available at https://my.locuszoom.org.

Results

Using IPDGC genotyping data, we identified 143 variants within the RIC3 gene (base pair coordinates 11:8,127,603-8,190,602 in genome build hg19/GRCh37; 11:8,106,056-8,169,055 in build GRCh38). The majority of the variants were non-coding, but 4 common exon variants were identified, including 3 missense variants (Supplementary Table 2). There were no missense variants in the genotyping data with MAF ≤ 3%. Neither of the 2 variants from the original study, p.P57T and p.V168L, were observed in this dataset. None of the RIC3 variants were associated with PD risk after Bonferroni correction (p-value threshold 3.5 × 10−4, Fig. 1A). We performed gene-based burden analysis of RIC3 to assess the cumulative effect of rare variants (MAF ≤ 3%). There was no significant association between RIC3 and PD risk in burden analysis (N variants = 6, CMC p-value = 0.67, Fp p-value = 0.78, Madson-Browning p-value = 0.79, SKAT-O p-value = 0.79, Zeggini p-value = 0.76) (Supplementary Table 3).
Fig. 1.

LocusZoom plots of the RIC3 region, showing the p-values and recombination rate of the SNPs analyzed in the (A) IPDGC genotyping data (hg19/GRCh37), (B) AMP-PD WGS data (GRCh38), (C) LARGE-PD GWAS summary statistic data (GRCh38), and (D) East Asian GWAS summary statistic data (hg19/GRCh37). The variant with the lowest p-value from the logistic regression analyses is annotated with a purple diamond in each plot. For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article. Abbreviations: AMP-PD, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease; Genome-Wide Association Study, GWAS; IPDGC, International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium; LARGE-PD, Latin American Research consortium on the Genetics of PD; RIC3, resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 3; whole genome sequencing, WGS.

In the AMP-PD WGS data, we identified 773 variants in RIC3, including 14 missense variants and 5 synonymous variants (Supplementary Table 4). The 2 variants from the original study were not present in this dataset. No variants were associated with PD risk after Bonferroni correction (p-value threshold 5.1 × 10−5, Fig. 1B). There was no significant burden of rare variants in RIC3 in association with PD risk using AMP-PD data (N variants = 571, all p-values > 0.05) (Supplementary Table 3). There was also no significant association between RIC3 with PD risk when assessing rare coding variants only (N variants = 15, all p-values > 0.05). In the LARGE-PD data, 293 variants with a MAF > 1% were identified in RIC3. Also, in LARGE-PD, there were 67 variants with a MAF ≤ 3%. In the Asian dataset, 126 variants were identified with a MAF > 1%. None of the variants in RIC3 in either of the datasets were associated with PD risk (Fig. 1C and D).

Discussion

We did not find any association between either single variants or the burden of rare variants in RIC3 and PD risk in the European datasets. These are the largest publicly available European PD case-control cohorts that have been screened for RIC3. We also did not observe any associations between variants in RIC3 and PD in GWAS summary statistics in cohorts from Latin America and East Asia. Overall, we did not find evidence to support the hypothesis that RIC3 is associated with PD risk in individuals of European, Latin American, or East Asian ancestry. This is in line with previous studies, including large PD GWAS meta-analyses (Foo et al., 2020; Loesch et al., 2021; Nalls et al. 2019) and targeted analyses of RIC3 (He et al., 2017; Ross et al., 2017), which also have not found evidence supporting the pathogenicity of RIC3. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that rare RIC3 variants may be associated with PD in specific families or populations. There was one variant, rs145965152, which had an odds ratio (OR) above 2 and higher frequency in affected verus unaffected individuals in the AMP-PD cohort (Supplementary Table 4). However, this variant was not identified in the other cohorts analyzed, and had a non-significant p-value (p = 0.47) in AMP-PD. We did not identify the 2 originally reported variants p.P57T and p.V168L in WGS data, while the other datasets only included common variants. In addition, it is possible that only a few select rare variants in RIC3 are pathogenic for PD, and this may not be detected by rare variant burden tests if the majority of other rare variants across the gene are not associated with PD. It is also important to recognize that RIC3 variants were identified in the Indian population as described in the original report, whereas our analysis of rare variants has been conducted in European populations. Only variants with a MAF > 1% were available in the GWAS summary statistics for the datasets of Latin American and Asian ancestry. it is possible that rare variants in this gene have a population-specific effect on PD risk. A GWAS of PD in East Asian populations have identified novel variants for PD risk not found in European GWASs (Foo et al., 2020). in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) (Karczewski et al., 2020), both of the variants reported in the original study have higher allele frequencies in the South Asian population. For the p.P57T mutation (rs778138358), a total of 14 alleles were identified in 30,596 total alleles (MAF 0.05%). For the p.V168L mutation (rs777471396), 25 alleles were identified in the South Asian population out of a total of 30,614 alleles (MAF 0.08%). One allele carrier for each variant was also identified in the category group ‘Other’ (population not assigned). In contrast, the variants were absent in all other populations on gnomAD, including European, Latino, and East Asian. This suggests that the reported variants in RIC3 are specific to South Asian populations, but does not answer the question of whether they are associated with PD risk, as individuals in gnomAD may not have been systematically screened for PD (Karczewski et al., 2020). Further studies or rare variants in South Asian populations are needed to clarify the role of RIC3 variants in PD etiology. In summary, we did not find evidence that RIC3 variants are associated with PD risk in European cohorts. We also did not find evidence of more common variants (MAF > 1%) being associated with PD in cohorts from Latin America and East Asia. Based on the varying frequency of RIC3 rare variants across geographic populations, further studies are encouraged of rare variants in RIC3 in non-European populations, in particular South Asian papulations, in order to fully evaluate the suggested role for RIC3 in PD etiology.
  14 in total

1.  RIC3 variants are not associated with Parkinson's disease in French-Canadians and French.

Authors:  Jay P Ross; Nicolas Dupré; Yves Dauvilliers; Stephanie Strong; Alexandre Dionne-Laporte; Patrick A Dion; Guy A Rouleau; Ziv Gan-Or
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 2.  Nicotine and nicotinic receptors; relevance to Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Maryka Quik; Jennifer M Kulak
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 3.  Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from structure to pathology.

Authors:  C Gotti; F Clementi
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Mike A Nalls; Cornelis Blauwendraat; Costanza L Vallerga; Karl Heilbron; Sara Bandres-Ciga; Diana Chang; Manuela Tan; Demis A Kia; Alastair J Noyce; Angli Xue; Jose Bras; Emily Young; Rainer von Coelln; Javier Simón-Sánchez; Claudia Schulte; Manu Sharma; Lynne Krohn; Lasse Pihlstrøm; Ari Siitonen; Hirotaka Iwaki; Hampton Leonard; Faraz Faghri; J Raphael Gibbs; Dena G Hernandez; Sonja W Scholz; Juan A Botia; Maria Martinez; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Suzanne Lesage; Joseph Jankovic; Lisa M Shulman; Margaret Sutherland; Pentti Tienari; Kari Majamaa; Mathias Toft; Ole A Andreassen; Tushar Bangale; Alexis Brice; Jian Yang; Ziv Gan-Or; Thomas Gasser; Peter Heutink; Joshua M Shulman; Nicholas W Wood; David A Hinds; John A Hardy; Huw R Morris; Jacob Gratten; Peter M Visscher; Robert R Graham; Andrew B Singleton
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  Identification of Risk Loci for Parkinson Disease in Asians and Comparison of Risk Between Asians and Europeans: A Genome-Wide Association Study.

Authors:  Jia Nee Foo; Elaine Guo Yan Chew; Sun Ju Chung; Rong Peng; Cornelis Blauwendraat; Mike A Nalls; Kin Y Mok; Wataru Satake; Tatsushi Toda; Yinxia Chao; Louis C S Tan; Moses Tandiono; Michelle M Lian; Ebonne Y Ng; Kumar-M Prakash; Wing-Lok Au; Wee-Yang Meah; Shi Qi Mok; Azlina Ahmad Annuar; Anne Y Y Chan; Ling Chen; Yongping Chen; Beom S Jeon; Lulu Jiang; Jia Lun Lim; Juei-Jueng Lin; Chunfeng Liu; Chengjie Mao; Vincent Mok; Zhong Pei; Hui-Fang Shang; Chang-He Shi; Kyuyoung Song; Ai Huey Tan; Yih-Ru Wu; Yu-Ming Xu; Renshi Xu; Yaping Yan; Jing Yang; BaoRong Zhang; Woon-Puay Koh; Shen-Yang Lim; Chiea Chuen Khor; Jianjun Liu; Eng-King Tan
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.

Authors:  Christopher C Chang; Carson C Chow; Laurent Cam Tellier; Shashaank Vattikuti; Shaun M Purcell; James J Lee
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  RVTESTS: an efficient and comprehensive tool for rare variant association analysis using sequence data.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhan; Youna Hu; Bingshan Li; Goncalo R Abecasis; Dajiang J Liu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Characterizing the Genetic Architecture of Parkinson's Disease in Latinos.

Authors:  Douglas P Loesch; Andrea R V R Horimoto; Karl Heilbron; Elif I Sarihan; Miguel Inca-Martinez; Emily Mason; Mario Cornejo-Olivas; Luis Torres; Pilar Mazzetti; Carlos Cosentino; Elison Sarapura-Castro; Andrea Rivera-Valdivia; Angel C Medina; Elena Dieguez; Victor Raggio; Andres Lescano; Vitor Tumas; Vanderci Borges; Henrique B Ferraz; Carlos R Rieder; Artur Schumacher-Schuh; Bruno L Santos-Lobato; Carlos Velez-Pardo; Marlene Jimenez-Del-Rio; Francisco Lopera; Sonia Moreno; Pedro Chana-Cuevas; William Fernandez; Gonzalo Arboleda; Humberto Arboleda; Carlos E Arboleda-Bustos; Dora Yearout; Cyrus P Zabetian; Paul Cannon; Timothy A Thornton; Timothy D O'Connor; Ignacio F Mata
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 11.274

10.  The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans.

Authors:  Konrad J Karczewski; Laurent C Francioli; Grace Tiao; Beryl B Cummings; Jessica Alföldi; Qingbo Wang; Ryan L Collins; Kristen M Laricchia; Andrea Ganna; Daniel P Birnbaum; Laura D Gauthier; Harrison Brand; Matthew Solomonson; Nicholas A Watts; Daniel Rhodes; Moriel Singer-Berk; Eleina M England; Eleanor G Seaby; Jack A Kosmicki; Raymond K Walters; Katherine Tashman; Yossi Farjoun; Eric Banks; Timothy Poterba; Arcturus Wang; Cotton Seed; Nicola Whiffin; Jessica X Chong; Kaitlin E Samocha; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Zachary Zappala; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; Eric Vallabh Minikel; Ben Weisburd; Monkol Lek; James S Ware; Christopher Vittal; Irina M Armean; Louis Bergelson; Kristian Cibulskis; Kristen M Connolly; Miguel Covarrubias; Stacey Donnelly; Steven Ferriera; Stacey Gabriel; Jeff Gentry; Namrata Gupta; Thibault Jeandet; Diane Kaplan; Christopher Llanwarne; Ruchi Munshi; Sam Novod; Nikelle Petrillo; David Roazen; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Andrea Saltzman; Molly Schleicher; Jose Soto; Kathleen Tibbetts; Charlotte Tolonen; Gordon Wade; Michael E Talkowski; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 69.504

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.