Conelius Ngwa1, Shaohua Qi1, Abdullah Al Mamun1, Yan Xu1, Romana Sharmeen1, Fudong Liu2. 1. Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: Fudong.Liu@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microglia play a central role in neuroinflammation in various CNS diseases.Neonatal microglial culture has been extensively used to in vitro study microglial activation; however, as many neuroinflammatory diseases occur in the elderly, the neonatal microglial culture may not fully replicate the aged microglial activity seen in these diseases. NEW METHOD: Primary microglia from both 18-24-month-old and P0-P4 C57BL/6 mice were cultured simultaneously. Morphology and activation profiles of the two age groups of microglia were examined following ischemic stimulation, by ELISA, RT-PCR, live microscopy, immunocytochemistry, and Western blotting. RESULTS: We showed that aged microglia had larger cell bodies, more cytoplasmic inclusions, and enhanced phagocytosis than neonatal microglia. Cytokine production in these cells exhibited heterogeneity either after or before ischemic stimulation. The baseline expression of microglial marker CD11b was significantly higher in aged vs. neonatal cells; ischemic stimulation increased the expression in neonatal vs. aged microglia only in males but not in females. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Previous primary microglia cultures have been limited to using neonatal/adult cells. This method is complementary to exiting methods and works for aged microglia, and does not suffer from potential limitations due to filtering artifacts. The protocol renders microglial culture no need for meningeal/hippocampal removal prior to brain tissue dissociation, and compares microglia between males vs. females, and between the aged vs. neonates. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that neonatal microglial culture is not appropriate for those in vitro studies that mimic the neuroinflammatory central nervous system disorders occurring in the elderly, in which case the aged microglial culture should be applied, and sex differences should be considered.
BACKGROUND: Microglia play a central role in neuroinflammation in various CNS diseases.Neonatal microglial culture has been extensively used to in vitro study microglial activation; however, as many neuroinflammatory diseases occur in the elderly, the neonatal microglial culture may not fully replicate the aged microglial activity seen in these diseases. NEW METHOD: Primary microglia from both 18-24-month-old and P0-P4 C57BL/6 mice were cultured simultaneously. Morphology and activation profiles of the two age groups of microglia were examined following ischemic stimulation, by ELISA, RT-PCR, live microscopy, immunocytochemistry, and Western blotting. RESULTS: We showed that aged microglia had larger cell bodies, more cytoplasmic inclusions, and enhanced phagocytosis than neonatal microglia. Cytokine production in these cells exhibited heterogeneity either after or before ischemic stimulation. The baseline expression of microglial marker CD11b was significantly higher in aged vs. neonatal cells; ischemic stimulation increased the expression in neonatal vs. aged microglia only in males but not in females. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Previous primary microglia cultures have been limited to using neonatal/adult cells. This method is complementary to exiting methods and works for aged microglia, and does not suffer from potential limitations due to filtering artifacts. The protocol renders microglial culture no need for meningeal/hippocampal removal prior to brain tissue dissociation, and compares microglia between males vs. females, and between the aged vs. neonates. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that neonatal microglial culture is not appropriate for those in vitro studies that mimic the neuroinflammatory central nervous system disorders occurring in the elderly, in which case the aged microglial culture should be applied, and sex differences should be considered.
Authors: Jana Vukovic; Michael J Colditz; Daniel G Blackmore; Marc J Ruitenberg; Perry F Bartlett Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Christopher J Bohlen; F Chris Bennett; Andrew F Tucker; Hannah Y Collins; Sara B Mulinyawe; Ben A Barres Journal: Neuron Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Burak Ozaydin; Ela Bicki; Onur E Taparli; Temour Z Sheikh; Danielle K Schmidt; Sefer Yapici; Margarett B Hackett; Nida Karahan-Keles; Jens C Eickhoff; Karson Corcoran; Claudia Lagoa-Miguel; Jose Guerrero Gonzalez; Douglas C Dean Iii; Andre M M Sousa; Peter A Ferrazzano; Jon E Levine; Pelin Cengiz Journal: Dev Neurosci Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Conelius Ngwa; Abdullah Al Mamun; Shaohua Qi; Romana Sharmeen; Yan Xu; Fudong Liu Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 5.955
Authors: Isabelle Coales; Stergios Tsartsalis; David Owen; Paul M Matthews; Nurun Fancy; Maria Weinert; Daniel Clode Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 9.587