Literature DB >> 34536465

Eye-Preserving Therapies for Advanced Retinoblastoma: A Multicenter Cohort of 1678 Patients in China.

Chuandi Zhou1, Xuyang Wen2, Yi Ding2, Jingwen Ding3, Mei Jin4, Zhenyin Liu5, Sha Wang6, Minglei Han7, Hongfeng Yuan8, Yishuang Xiao9, Li Wu10, Jiancang Wang11, Yangjun Li12, Jiawei Yu13, Yuechun Wen14, Juan Ye15, Rong Liu16, Zhijun Chen17, Shangcai Xue18, Wei Lu19, Hongfei Liao20, Jizhe Cui21, Dan Zhu22, Fang Lu23, Song Tang24, Yu Wu25, Tseden Yangkyi26, Guanghong Zhang27, Miershalijiang Wubuli28, Huiyu Guo29, Xian Wang30, Yanjin He31, Xunlun Sheng32, Qing Wang33, Yingxiu Luo2, Jiayan Fan2, Jinlei Qi34, Zhangsheng Yu35, Jia Tan6, Jianhong Liang36, Xiantao Sun37, Liwen Jin38, Xinji Yang39, Jing Zhang40, Xunda Ji41, Junyang Zhao42, Renbing Jia43, Xianqun Fan44.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study attempted to estimate the impact of eye-preserving therapies for the long-term prognosis of patients with advanced retinoblastoma with regard to overall survival and ocular salvage.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study covering all 31 provinces (38 retinoblastoma treating centers) of mainland China. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand six hundred seventy-eight patients diagnosed with group D or E retinoblastoma from January 2006 through May 2016.
METHODS: Chart review was performed. The patients were divided into primary enucleation and eye-preserving groups, and they were followed up for survival status. The impact of initial treatment on survival was evaluated by Cox analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and final eye preservation.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 43.9 months, 196 patients (12%) died, and the 5-year overall survival was 86%. In total, the eyeball preservation rate was 48%. In this cohort, 1172 patients (70%) had unilateral retinoblastoma, whereas 506 patients (30%) had bilateral disease. For patients with unilateral disease, 570 eyes (49%) underwent primary enucleation, and 602 patients (51%) received eye-preserving therapies initially. During the follow-up (median, 45.6 months), 59 patients (10%) from the primary enucleation group and 56 patients (9.3%) from the eye-preserving group died. Multivariate Cox analyses indicated no significant difference in overall survival between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.84; P = 0.250). For patients with bilateral disease, 95 eyes (19%) underwent primary enucleation, and 411 patients (81%) received eye-preserving therapies initially. During the follow-up (median, 40.1 months), 12 patients (13%) from the primary enucleation group and 69 patients (17%) from the eye-preserving group died. For bilateral retinoblastoma with the worse eye classified as group E, patients undergoing primary enucleation exhibited better overall survival (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.10-5.01; P = 0.027); however, this survival advantage was not evident until passing 22.6 months after initial diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Eye-preserving therapies have been used widely for advanced retinoblastoma in China. Patients with bilateral disease whose worse eye was classified as group E and who initially underwent eye-preserving therapies exhibited a worse overall survival. The choice of primary treatment for advanced retinoblastoma should be weighed carefully.
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort study; Enucleation; Eye-preserving therapies; Retinoblastoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34536465     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  1 in total

1.  Cohort studies investigating the effects of exposures: key principles that impact the credibility of the results.

Authors:  Anna Miroshnychenko; Dena Zeraatkar; Mark R Phillips; Sophie J Bakri; Lehana Thabane; Mohit Bhandari; Varun Chaudhary
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.456

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.