| Literature DB >> 34535083 |
Lawrence Lubyayi1,2, Patrice A Mawa3,4,5, Stephen Cose3,6, Alison M Elliott3,6, Jonathan Levin7, Emily L Webb8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immuno-epidemiologists are often faced with multivariate outcomes, measured repeatedly over time. Such data are characterised by complex inter- and intra-outcome relationships which must be accounted for during analysis. Scientific questions of interest might include determining the effect of a treatment on the evolution of all outcomes together, or grouping outcomes that change in the same way. Modelling the different outcomes separately may not be appropriate because it ignores the underlying relationships between outcomes. In such situations, a joint modelling strategy is necessary. This paper describes a pairwise joint modelling approach and discusses its benefits over more simple statistical analysis approaches, with application to data from a study of the response to BCG vaccination in the first year of life, conducted in Entebbe, Uganda.Entities:
Keywords: BCG vaccine; Cytokine responses; Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection; Linear mixed model; Pairwise joint modelling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34535083 PMCID: PMC8449434 DOI: 10.1186/s12865-021-00453-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Immunol ISSN: 1471-2172 Impact factor: 3.615
Fig. 1Conceptual framework
Baseline characteristics of study participants
| LTBI negative (n = 150) | LTBI positive (n = 132) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean mother's age (SD) (mv 0, 3)a | 23.65 | (3.67) | 25.53 | (4.99) |
| Median number of pregnancies (IQR) (mv 1, 1) | 2 | (1–3) | 2 | (2–4) |
| Positive malaria test during pregnancy (mv 1, 1) | 38 | 25.5% | 29 | 22.1% |
| Ever lived with someone with TB (mv 2, 1) | 3 | 2.0% | 19 | 14.5% |
| BCG scarring (mv 1, 2) | 106 | 71.1% | 95 | 73.1% |
| Current marital status (mv 2, 4) | ||||
| Single | 28 | 18.9% | 20 | 15.6% |
| Married/living as married | 120 | 81.1% | 108 | 84.4% |
| Drink alcohol (mv 3, 4) | 18 | 12.2% | 28 | 21.9% |
| Mother's tribe grouping (mv 5, 3) | ||||
| Central | 56 | 38.6% | 72 | 55.8% |
| Other | 89 | 61.4% | 57 | 44.2% |
| Father's tribe grouping (mv 3, 2) | ||||
| Central | 58 | 39.5% | 75 | 57.7% |
| Other | 89 | 60.5% | 55 | 42.3% |
| Sex of the baby, male | 77 | 51.3% | 77 | 58.3% |
| Mean birth weight in kg (SD) | 3.24 | (0.43) | 3.21 | (0.40) |
Data are mean (SD), median (IQR), or n (%)
SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, mv missing values
aFigures in parentheses indicate missing values in the LTBI-Negative and LTBI-Positive groups, respectively
P-values from Mann–Whitney tests for the comparison of cytokine responses to PPD between the two infant groups
| Outcome | Cord blood | Week1 | Week4 | Week6 | Week10 | Week14 | Week24 | Week52 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNF | 0.060 | 0.697 | 0.137 | 0.096 | 0.589 | 0.253 | 0.377 | |
| IFN-γ | 0.891 | 0.691 | 0.203 | 0.703 | 0.299 | 0.055 | 0.121 | |
| IL-2 | 0.982 | 0.643 | 0.400 | 0.948 | 0.629 | 0.601 | 0.743 | 0.071 |
| IL-5 | 0.729 | 0.430 | 0.864 | 0.750 | 0.147 | 0.472 | 0.156 | 0.688 |
| IL-13 | 0.888 | 0.915 | 0.351 | 0.715 | 0.178 | 0.620 | 0.496 | 0.375 |
| IL-17A | 0.353 | 0.852 | 0.408 | 0.144 | 0.418 | 0.841 | ||
| IL-10 | 0.056 | 0.959 | 0.187 | 0.171 | 0.293 | 0.765 | 0.538 |
Unadjusted p-values for the comparisons of responses between infants born of LTBI positive or negative mothers at each time point. Values in bold are significant at the 5% level (without considering the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing)
Fig. 2Individual profiles for a sample of 30 infants. PPD-specific cytokine responses (on the log scale) for a consecutive sample of 30 infants, for each of the 7 cytokines considered. Each infant is represented by a single line
Fig. 3Average evolutions of cytokine responses to PPD in infants of mothers with or without LTBI. Average PPD-specific cytokine concentrations corrected for background (on the log scale). Points represent mean values and the bars represent 95% confidence intervals for the mean. The solid and dashed lines represent concentrations from children born of LTBI-positive and LTBI-negative mothers respectively
Fig. 4Estimates for interaction effects of time and LTBI status from univariate and pairwise models. Estimates and 95% confidence intervals for the interaction effects of time and mother’s LTBI status from univariate linear mixed models (solid circles and associated dashed whiskers) and from the pairwise joint modelling approach (solid squares and whiskers)
Estimates and standard errors from pairwise model
| Outcome | Estimate | Std.Error |
|---|---|---|
| IFN-γ | − 0.00227 | 0.0025 |
| TNF | − 0.00116 | 0.0016 |
| IL-13 | − 0.00002 | 0.0022 |
| IL-17A | − 0.00265 | 0.0015 |
| IL-2 | 0.00231 | 0.0019 |
| IL-5 | 0.00102 | 0.0021 |
| IL-10 | − 0.00264 | 0.0017 |
Parameter estimates and standard errors for the interaction effects of time and mother’s LTBI status obtained from the pairwise joint modelling approach
Fig. 5Principal components analysis of the correlation matrix of random intercepts and of cord blood outcomes. a Component loadings for the seven outcomes based on the 7 × 7 correlation matrix of random intercepts from the pairwise approach. b Component loadings for the seven outcomes based on cord blood responses to PPD