Song Qu1, Patricia Fetsch2, Anish Thomas3, Yves Pommier3, David S Schrump4, Markku M Miettinen2, Haobin Chen5. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Thoracic Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Thoracic Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: haobin.chen@nih.gov.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A new molecular subtype classification was recently proposed for SCLC. It is necessary to validate it in primary SCLC tumors by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and define its clinical relevance. METHODS: We used IHC to assess four subtype markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1) in 194 cores from 146 primary SCLC tumors. The profiles of tumor-associated CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells, MYC paralogs, SLFN11, and SYP were compared among different subtypes. Validation was performed using publicly available RNA sequencing data of SCLC. RESULTS: ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 were the dominant molecular subtypes in 78.2%, 5.6%, 7%, and 2.8% of the tumors, respectively; 6.3% of the tumors were negative for all four subtype markers. Notably, three cases were uniquely positive for YAP1. Substantial intratumoral heterogeneity was observed, with 17.6% and 2.8% of the tumors being positive for two and three subtype markers, respectively. The non-ASCL1/NEUROD1 tumors had more CD8+ T-cells and manifested more frequently an "inflamed" immunophenotype. L-MYC and MYC were more often associated with ASCL1/NEUROD1 subtypes and non-ASCL1/NEUROD1 subtypes, respectively. SLFN11 expression was absent in 40% of the tumors, especially those negative for the four subtype markers. SYP was often expressed in the ASCL1 and NEUROD1 subtypes and was associated with less tumor-associated CD8+ T-cells and a "desert" immunophenotype. CONCLUSIONS: We validated the new molecular subtype classification in primary SCLC tumors by IHC and identified several intriguing associations between subtypes and therapeutic markers. The new subtype classification may potentially assist treatment decisions in SCLC. Published by Elsevier Inc.
INTRODUCTION: A new molecular subtype classification was recently proposed for SCLC. It is necessary to validate it in primary SCLC tumors by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and define its clinical relevance. METHODS: We used IHC to assess four subtype markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1) in 194 cores from 146 primary SCLC tumors. The profiles of tumor-associated CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells, MYC paralogs, SLFN11, and SYP were compared among different subtypes. Validation was performed using publicly available RNA sequencing data of SCLC. RESULTS: ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 were the dominant molecular subtypes in 78.2%, 5.6%, 7%, and 2.8% of the tumors, respectively; 6.3% of the tumors were negative for all four subtype markers. Notably, three cases were uniquely positive for YAP1. Substantial intratumoral heterogeneity was observed, with 17.6% and 2.8% of the tumors being positive for two and three subtype markers, respectively. The non-ASCL1/NEUROD1 tumors had more CD8+ T-cells and manifested more frequently an "inflamed" immunophenotype. L-MYC and MYC were more often associated with ASCL1/NEUROD1 subtypes and non-ASCL1/NEUROD1 subtypes, respectively. SLFN11 expression was absent in 40% of the tumors, especially those negative for the four subtype markers. SYP was often expressed in the ASCL1 and NEUROD1 subtypes and was associated with less tumor-associated CD8+ T-cells and a "desert" immunophenotype. CONCLUSIONS: We validated the new molecular subtype classification in primary SCLC tumors by IHC and identified several intriguing associations between subtypes and therapeutic markers. The new subtype classification may potentially assist treatment decisions in SCLC. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: D N Carney; A F Gazdar; G Bepler; J G Guccion; P J Marangos; T W Moody; M H Zweig; J D Minna Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1985-06 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Martin L Sos; Felix Dietlein; Martin Peifer; Jakob Schöttle; Hyatt Balke-Want; Christian Müller; Mirjam Koker; André Richters; Stefanie Heynck; Florian Malchers; Johannes M Heuckmann; Danila Seidel; Patrick A Eyers; Roland T Ullrich; Andrey P Antonchick; Viktor V Vintonyak; Peter M Schneider; Takashi Ninomiya; Herbert Waldmann; Reinhard Büttner; Daniel Rauh; Lukas C Heukamp; Roman K Thomas Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Michael V Di Maria; Robert Veve; Roy M Bremmes; Anna E Barón; Chan Zeng; Wilbur A Franklin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Allison Stewart; Carl M Gay; Yuanxin Xi; Santhosh Sivajothi; V Sivakamasundari; Junya Fujimoto; Mohan Bolisetty; Patrice M Hartsfield; Veerakumar Balasubramaniyan; Milind D Chalishazar; Cesar Moran; Neda Kalhor; John Stewart; Hai Tran; Stephen G Swisher; Jack A Roth; Jianjun Zhang; John de Groot; Bonnie Glisson; Trudy G Oliver; John V Heymach; Ignacio Wistuba; Paul Robson; Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers Journal: Nat Cancer Date: 2020-02-17
Authors: Nitin Roper; Moises J Velez; Alberto Chiappori; Yoo Sun Kim; Jun S Wei; Sivasish Sindiri; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Deborah Mulford; Suresh Kumar; Kris Ylaya; Christopher Trindade; Irena Manukyan; Anna-Leigh Brown; Jane B Trepel; Jung-Min Lee; Stephen Hewitt; Javed Khan; Anish Thomas Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Camille Tlemsani; Lorinc Pongor; Fathi Elloumi; Luc Girard; Kenneth E Huffman; Nitin Roper; Sudhir Varma; Augustin Luna; Vinodh N Rajapakse; Robin Sebastian; Kurt W Kohn; Julia Krushkal; Mirit I Aladjem; Beverly A Teicher; Paul S Meltzer; William C Reinhold; John D Minna; Anish Thomas; Yves Pommier Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Bingnan Zhang; C Allison Stewart; Qi Wang; Robert J Cardnell; Pedro Rocha; Junya Fujimoto; Luisa M Solis Soto; Runsheng Wang; Veronica Novegil; Peter Ansell; Lei He; Luisa Fernandez; Adam Jendrisak; Cole Gilbertson; Joseph D Schonhoft; Jiyun Byun; Joshua Jones; Amanda K L Anderson; Ana Aparicio; Hai Tran; Marcelo V Negrao; Jianjun Zhang; Wei-Lien Wang; Ignacio I Wistuba; Jing Wang; Rick Wenstrup; Lauren A Byers; Carl M Gay Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: David Fielding; Andrew J Dalley; Mahendra Singh; Lakshmy Nandakumar; Katia Nones; Vanessa Lakis; Haarika Chittoory; Kaltin Ferguson; Farzad Bashirzadeh; Michael Bint; Carl Pahoff; Jung Hwa Son; Alan Hodgson; Sowmya Sharma; David Godbolt; Kylie Coleman; Lenore Whitfield; Nicola Waddell; Sunil R Lakhani; Gunter Hartel; Peter T Simpson Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2022-08-30