Literature DB >> 34534592

Help when you need it: Perspectives of adults with T1D on the support and training they would have wanted when starting CGM.

Molly L Tanenbaum1, Laurel H Messer2, Christine A Wu3, Marina Basina4, Bruce A Buckingham5, Danielle Hessler6, Shelagh A Mulvaney7, David M Maahs8, Korey K Hood9.   

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to explore preferences that adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have for training and support to initiate and sustain optimal use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology.
METHODS: Twenty-two adults with T1D (M age 30.95 ± 8.32; 59.1% female; 90.9% Non-Hispanic; 86.4% White; diabetes duration 13.5 ± 8.42 years; 72.7% insulin pump users) who had initiated CGM use in the past year participated in focus groups exploring two overarching questions: (1) What helped you learn to use your CGM? and (2) What additional support would you have wanted? Focus groups used a semi-structured interview guide and were recorded, transcribed and analyzed.
RESULTS: Overarching themes identified were: (1) "I got it going by myself": CGM training left to the individual; (2) Internet as diabetes educator, troubleshooter, and peer support system; and (3) domains of support they wanted, including content and format of this support.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies current gaps in training and potential avenues for enhancing device education and CGM onboarding support for adults with T1D. Providing CGM users with relevant, timely resources and attending to the emotional side of using CGM could alleviate the burden of starting a new device and promote sustained device use.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Continuous glucose monitoring; Health care delivery; Psychosocial aspects; Telehealth; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34534592      PMCID: PMC8578423          DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   8.180


  51 in total

1.  Expectations and Attitudes of Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes After Using a Hybrid Closed Loop System.

Authors:  Esti Iturralde; Molly L Tanenbaum; Sarah J Hanes; Sakinah C Suttiratana; Jodie M Ambrosino; Trang T Ly; David M Maahs; Diana Naranjo; Natalie Walders-Abramson; Stuart A Weinzimer; Bruce A Buckingham; Korey K Hood
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  SPECTRUM.

Authors:  Bernhard Gehr; Martin Holder; Bernhard Kulzer; Karin Lange; Andreas Liebl; Claudia Sahm; Simone von Sengbusch; Sandra Schlüter; Thorsten Siegmund; Ulrike Thurm; Ralph Ziegler; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-20

3.  Orthosomnia: Are Some Patients Taking the Quantified Self Too Far?

Authors:  Kelly Glazer Baron; Sabra Abbott; Nancy Jao; Natalie Manalo; Rebecca Mullen
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Acceptability of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Elderly Diabetes Patients Using Multiple Daily Insulin Injections.

Authors:  Špela Volčanšek; Mojca Lunder; Andrej Janež
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  What are the quality of life-related benefits and losses associated with real-time continuous glucose monitoring? A survey of current users.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Danielle Hessler
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  'I was ready for it at the beginning': Parent experiences with early introduction of continuous glucose monitoring following their child's Type 1 diabetes diagnosis.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Dessi P Zaharieva; Ananta Addala; Jessica Ngo; Priya Prahalad; Brianna Leverenz; Christin New; David M Maahs; Korey K Hood
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Safety of outpatient closed-loop control: first randomized crossover trials of a wearable artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Eric Renard; Claudio Cobelli; Howard C Zisser; Patrick Keith-Hynes; Stacey M Anderson; Sue A Brown; Daniel R Chernavvsky; Marc D Breton; Lloyd B Mize; Anne Farret; Jérôme Place; Daniela Bruttomesso; Simone Del Favero; Federico Boscari; Silvia Galasso; Angelo Avogaro; Lalo Magni; Federico Di Palma; Chiara Toffanin; Mirko Messori; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Improving Clinical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control-The 4T Study.

Authors:  Priya Prahalad; Dessi P Zaharieva; Ananta Addala; Christin New; David Scheinker; Manisha Desai; Korey K Hood; David M Maahs
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.555

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Barriers and Facilitators to Diabetes Device Adoption for People with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Persis V Commissariat
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.